Literature DB >> 26604687

In silico approach for the discovery of new PPARγ modulators among plant-derived polyphenols.

José Antonio Encinar1, Gregorio Fernández-Ballester1, Vicente Galiano-Ibarra2, Vicente Micol3.   

Abstract

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is a well-characterized member of the PPAR family that is predominantly expressed in adipose tissue and plays a significant role in lipid metabolism, adipogenesis, glucose homeostasis, and insulin sensitization. Full agonists of synthetic thiazolidinediones (TZDs) have been therapeutically used in clinical practice to treat type 2 diabetes for many years. Although it can effectively lower blood glucose levels and improve insulin sensitivity, the administration of TZDs has been associated with severe side effects. Based on recent evidence obtained with plant-derived polyphenols, the present in silico study aimed at finding new selective human PPARγ (hPPARγ) modulators that are able to improve glucose homeostasis with reduced side effects compared with TZDs. Docking experiments have been used to select compounds with strong binding affinity (ΔG values ranging from -10.0±0.9 to -11.4±0.9 kcal/mol) by docking against the binding site of several X-ray structures of hPPARγ. These putative modulators present several molecular interactions with the binding site of the protein. Additionally, most of the selected compounds have favorable druggability and good ADMET properties. These results aim to pave the way for further bench-scale analysis for the discovery of new modulators of hPPARγ that do not induce any side effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADMET; AutoDock/Vina; TZDs; high-throughput computing; human PPARγ; molecular docking; phenolic compounds; virtual screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26604687      PMCID: PMC4639521          DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S93449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther        ISSN: 1177-8881            Impact factor:   4.162


Introduction

Human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (hPPARs) are nuclear soluble proteins that function as ligand-dependent transcription factors belonging to the thyroid/retinoid nuclear receptor family.1 After binding to different types of ligands, PPARs form heterodimers with the retinoic X receptor (RXR), and the resulting PPAR/RXR heterodimer recruits different transcriptional cofactors that bind to the promoter region of the respective target gene and initiate transcription.2 To date, three PPAR proteins have been identified:3,4 PPARα (UniProt: Q07869-PPARA_HUMAN), PPARδ/β (Uni-Prot: Q03181-PPARD_HUMAN), and PPARγ (UniProt: P37231-PPARG_HUMAN). All three of these proteins coordinate pathways involved in lipid and glucose metabolism. Despite the similarities in their primary and secondary structures, PPAR isoforms present marked differences in their tissue distribution, ligands, and physiological role.5 PPARα regulates the expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism and has a higher presence in the heart, liver, and brown adipose tissue.6 The PPARδ/β isoform is expressed ubiquitously in all tissues, particularly in tissues involved in lipid metabolism, such as adipose, liver, kidney, and muscle tissues. Based on the information currently available, it appears that PPARδ/β plays a role mainly in three areas: 1) regulation of energy metabolism, 2) cell proliferation and differentiation, and 3) protection under stress conditions, such as oxidative stress and inflammation.7 PPARγ is the best-characterized member of the PPAR family; it is predominantly expressed in adipose tissue and plays a significant role in lipid metabolism, adipogenesis, glucose homeostasis, and insulin sensitization.8,9 PPARγ presents two isoforms, PPARγ1 and PPARγ2, as a result of differential promoter usage and alternative splicing which results in PPARγ1 having 28 additional amino acids at the N-terminus. PPARγ1 is abundantly expressed in adipose tissue, the large intestine, and hematopoietic cells and to a lower degree in the kidneys, liver, muscles, pancreas, and small intestine. PPARγ2 is restricted to white and brown adipose tissue under physiological conditions.10,11 Various molecules have been suggested as biological ligands of PPARγ: polyunsaturated fatty acids, prostanoids, eicosanoids, components of oxidized low-density lipoproteins, and oxidized alkyl phospholipids.12 These molecules can activate PPARγ and lead to increased expression of PPARγ-target genes. However, the in vivo concentration of many of these molecules is not sufficient to activate PPARγ. Therefore, further studies are needed to determine specific endogenous ligands of PPARγ. As synthetic ligands, thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are full agonists that have been used in clinical practice to treat type 2 diabetes for many years and they effectively lower blood glucose levels and improve insulin sensitivity.13 However, the administration of TZDs has been associated with severe side effects such as fluid retention, weight gain, cardiac hypertrophy, bone fractures, and hepatotoxicity.14 Troglitazone was withdrawn from the market due to liver toxicity; farglitazar failed to pass Phase III clinical trials due to the emergence of peripheral edema; rosiglitazone was removed from the European market due to its association with excessive cardiovascular risk. Pioglitazone is currently in clinical practice even though it has also been linked to controversial side effects, including an increased risk of cardiovascular-related death.15 Considering these facts, it appears evident that the search for safer new agonists is an important goal in the fight against obesity-related pathologies. The use of natural products has re-emerged in the field of drug discovery.16 Plant-derived molecules possess a high chemical scaffold diversity, which leads to molecular promiscuity,17 and are evolutionarily optimized to serve different biological functions, conferring them a high drug-likeness and making them an excellent source for the identification of new drug leads.18 Several PPARγ ligands were identified in plants that are common food sources, including the tea plant, soybeans, palm oil, ginger, grapes, and wine, and a number of culinary herbs and spices1 (eg, Origanum vulgare, Rosmarinus officinalis, Salvia officinalis, and Thymus vulgaris). The use of these compounds, which are often weak PPARγ agonists, may become an alternative for the prevention of obesity through dietary intervention. Among the natural products that have been well characterized to serve as PPARγ ligands, various phenolic compounds have been identified.1 We recently reported19 that the capacities of lemon verbena polyphenolic extract and its major compound verbascoside to ameliorate high glucose-induced metabolic disturbances are mediated by the PPARγ-dependent transcriptional upregulation of adiponectin. Therefore, the role of polyphenols as partial PPARγ agonists based on selective receptor–cofactor interactions and target gene regulation may deserve intensive research.20 The diet of Western populations is rich in phenolic compounds, which are primarily found in fruits, vegetables, and beverages, such as tea, coffee, wine, and fruit juices. However, precise knowledge of the effects of each phenolic compound on health and disease, as well as the most accurate possible assessment of polyphenol intake, still requires extensive scientific research. In this context, we performed an in silico study to find potential efficient hPPARγ agonists from the phenolic compounds recorded in the Phenol Explorer database21 (~924 compounds) together with other chemical libraries with molecules presenting 70% structural similarity to scutellarin (~10,437 compounds), a flavone that has been shown to bind PPAR in computational studies and has been validated in cellular assays.22 The best scoring compounds were compared with several phytochemicals found in the literature as well-characterized PPARγ ligands. These compounds were also evaluated for their pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. Our in silico approach aims to establish a basis for the further evaluation of potential hPPARγ modulators.

Materials and methods

Protein structures for hPPARγ and chemical libraries

To date, 130 crystal structures of the hPPARγ protein have been solved and deposited into the Protein Data Bank, many of them with their potential inhibitors, including phenolic compounds. Only the X-ray-derived PPARγ structures in complex with modulators were taken from the Brookhaven Protein Data Bank, and these have the following codes: 4PRG, 4JL4, 4JAZ, 4HEE, 4FGY, 4F9M, 4EMA, 4EM9, 4E4Q, 4E4K, 4A4W, 4A4V, 3VSP, 3VSO, 3VSP, 3VN2, 3VJI, 3V9V, and 3V9T. Altogether, these structures represent a wide variety of sample configurations of the receptor.23 The residues forming the binding site for the ligand were investigated.24,25 The two-dimensional (2D) structures of a total of 924 compounds belonging to different classes of phenolic compounds were downloaded in spatial data file (SDF) format from the Phenol Explorer 3.6 database. Additionally, the 2D structure of 10,457 scutellarin-related compounds were download in SDF format from PubChem.26 To handle the large number of ligand structures, we developed a Python (http://www.python.org) script to convert 2D SDFs into individual three-dimensional structures in mol2 format using Marvin Suite 6.0 from ChemAxon (http://www.chemaxon.com).

Docking procedure

Prior to initiating the docking procedure, the protein (receptor) and ligand structures should be prepared. Each PDB file receptor (PPARγ) was edited using PyMOL27 to select a single polypeptide chain and remove all water molecules and cocrystallized ligands from the binding site. All of the selected protein structures were then subjected to geometry optimization using the repair function of the FoldX algorithm.28,29 To perform docking with AutoDock/Vina, the receptor and ligand structures were transformed to the pdbqt file format, which includes atomic charges, atom-type definitions and, for ligands, topological information (rotatable bonds).30 These file preparations were performed using the AutoDock/Vina plugin with scripts from the AutoDock Tools package.31 The ligands used for subsequent docking runs can be prepared either individually through PyMOL selections or by specifying a directory containing a library of ligands to be docked.31 A grid with dimensions of 22×22×22 points was centered to ensure coverage of the binding site of the structure. The files generated for each ligand (“ligand.pdbqt” and “ligand.vina_config.txt”) contain the path for “receptor. pdbqt” and “ligand.pdbqt”, the coordinates of the grid center, the size of the grid in points, the path and name for one output file with all of the best calculated poses, and the path and name for another output file with the ΔG (kcal/mol) for each pose. AutoDock/Vina was set up on a Linux cluster under the ROCKS 6.1 distribution (http://www.rocksclusters.org/) with Condor Roll (http://www.rocksclusters.org/roll-documentation/condor/) to distribute all AutoDock/Vina jobs to the nodes of the cluster. AutoDock/Vina can run on a Windows OS, but should be run on a Linux OS to achieve high performance. Once the calculation is completed, two files are generated per ligand, “ligand.docked.pdbqt” and “ligand.vina.log”, which contain the coordinates of the atoms for each pose (maximum of 20 poses) of a given ligand and the ΔG (kcal/mol) for each pose, respectively. When analyzing a large number of files we used a Python script to automate the reading and extraction of data from ligand.vina.log files. Compounds with minor calculated free energy variations (ie, the best theoretical binding energy) were selected as putative modulators.

In silico analysis of drug likeness and ADMET properties

The drug likeness of the screened compounds was calculated using Marvin Suite 6.0 from ChemAxon (http://www.chemaxon.com). Again, the analysis of large amounts of data was automated with a Python script to obtain up to 80 physicochemical properties of each compound. The in silico absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) properties of the selected compounds were calculated as an alternative approach to the expensive experimental evaluation of ADMET profiles.32 For ADMET assessment, we used admetSAR32 and OSIRIS Property Explorer (http://www.organic-chemistry.org/prog/peo/).

Results and discussion

Cavity binding site analysis

hPPARs, particularly the hPPARγ protein, have been widely studied by crystallographers, as evidenced by the 130 X-ray structures that have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank and recorded in the UniProt database (http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/P37231). The structural alignment of different PPARγ entries (backbone atoms of amino acids 223–505) showed root-mean-square deviation values below 0.5 Å (0.488±0.109 Å), indicating small conformational variability. All of the structures cocrystallized with a ligand present at the binding site cavity located in the area surrounding α-helix 304–330 (Figure 1A). Measurements of the volume and area of this internal cavity show a direct linear relationship with the size of the ligand, particularly the nonpolar area of the ligand (Figure 1B and Supplementary material 1). The analysis of the cavity binding site indicates that the size of the cavity is apparently adapted to the cocrystallized ligand. Because several amino acids were found to be involved in the interactions with hPPARγ ligands (modulators), the set of interacting residues should be ligand-dependent. As an example, in 3V9V.pdb, a derivative of cercosporamide,33 which acts as a partial agonist, was cocrystalized. This ligand provides several interactions with multiple residues of the protein, including Arg280 (polar contacts)24 and Ile262, Ile341, Ser342, Met348, Ile281, Leu353, Met343, Leu330, Tyr327, Met364, Lys367, His449, Ser289, Cys285, Arg288, Gly284, and Phe287 (nonpolar contacts).24 In this example, the measured34 volume and area are 971.8 Å3 and 1025.3 Å2, respectively. For the remaining 130 hPPARγ structures, the size of the deep groove encompassing the binding pocket was found to be highly variable (Figure 1B and Supplementary material 1). Thus, the binding of different natural phenolic compounds and other drugs to different sites within this large internal cavity can be assumed to modulate the activity of hPPARγ, and it appears to be a promising mode of action for the design of drug candidates35 against hPPARγ.
Figure 1

hPPARγ cavity binding site analysis.

Notes: Panel (A) shows the secondary structure of hPPARγ and large cavity of ligand binding site. Amino acids defining the cavity are displayed in sticks. The picture was created using 4PRG.pdb as an example with PyMol program.27 Panel (B) shows the linear relationship between calculated34 volume (Å3) and area (Å2) of the cavity binding site and the nonpolar surface55 of all crystallographic ligands known to date (131 hPPARγ structures deposited into Protein Data Bank for hPPARγ). Panel (C) shows the linear relationship between the free energy variation calculated30 for crystallographic ligands and the values of area and volume of the binding site. The dotted line in the graphs of the (B) and (C) panels represents the adjusted linear equation to the experimental data using Microsoft Excel software. All data are available as Supplementary material 1 in a Microsoft Excel file.

Abbreviation: hPPARγ, human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma.

The variation in the free energy for the binding of ligands cocrystallized with the 123 structures of hPPARγ was measured via AutoDock/Vina (Figure 1C). Binding energies are representative of how precisely the ligand (phenolic natural products or drug candidates) binds to the target protein and were thus considered a set of reference comparisons for selection of the compounds in the library to be screened.35 For the above-described example (3V9V.pdb), the ligand binding ΔG value measured with AutoDock/Vina was −10 kcal/mol, and only 23% of the ligands cocrystallized with hPPARγ have a ΔG≤−10 kcal/mol (Figure 1C). The calculation of the dissociation constant KD 36 as a function of ΔG (KD = expΔ) indicated that ΔG values ≤−10 kcal/mol imply the KD is in the nanomolar or subnanomolar range, which was used as a threshold to filter the docking results.

hPPARγ – ligand molecular docking analysis

Progress in high-performance computing allows the virtual screening of a large number of compounds in a short time and the selection of one of the compounds to be tested experimentally.37 The molecular docking of a protein target and small ligand compounds predicts the best interaction mode for a defined binding site.38,39 In the current study, hPPARγ was docked with two sets of compounds: the first contained 924 molecules registered in the Phenol Explorer database21 as phenolic compounds, and the second set includes 10,437 compounds with structural similarity to scutellarin22 (http://goo.gl/1O3O07), of which 1,085 comply with Lipinski’s Rule of Five.40 X-ray crystallography techniques are commonly used to obtain conformations of proteins with high resolution and usually provide snapshots of one or some of the conformations of the proteins.41 However, in the case of hPPARγ, there are a tremendous number of crystallographic structures that may show a large conformational space with some similarity to the native conditions of the protein. During ligand binding, the receptor protein undergoes conformational changes that are essential for its function.42 AutoDock/Vina has been implemented to ensure flexibility of the side chains of the amino acids constituting the ligand binding site. However, performing docking while considering the flexibility of a few amino acid binding sites requires a high computational cost that cannot be assumed during the analysis of the high number of compounds used in this study. For this reason, we chose a sample of 19 hPPARγ structures (see “Materials and methods” section) for docking, and we did not consider the flexibility of the side chains of the amino acids involved in the binding sites. Tables 1 and 2 show the docking scores obtained for phenolic compounds from the Phenol Explorer database and scutellarin-related compounds, respectively; these tables show hydrogen bonds, direct contacts based on van der Waals radii, and the ΔG calculated using AutoDocK/Vina. The free energy variation is a representative value of the number and intensity of the atomic interactions between the receptor (protein) and the ligand and can thus be considered a baseline comparison for the selection of lead compounds in the process of drug design.35
Table 1

Molecular docking analysis for phenolic compounds showing estimated binding free energy variation30 and interacting residues24 of the binding site of hPPARγ

PElnFeb (mean ± SD, kcal/mol)H-birVdWir
Scutellarin−9.21±0.40R288H449, E295, C285, L330, L333, S289, R288, L340, I341, I326, M364, M329, A292, Y327
PE000149−11.44±0.93R288H449, E295, C285, L330, L333, S289, R288, L340, I341, I326, M364, M329, A292, Y327
PE000143−11.19±1.05S289, R288, S342V339, A292, L228, L330, L333, S289, R288, L353, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M364, M348, G284
PE000095−10.78±0.65S289, R288, C285, L228V339, L228, L330, L333, E259, Y327, H323, S289, R288, L340, I341, S342, E343, I281, R280, C285, G284, Q286, H449, I262, F264, P227, L476, I326, A292, E291
PE000086−10.72±1.06S289, R288, S342I262, C285, L330, L333, S289, R288, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M364, M348, G284
PE000075−10.69±0.56C285H449, C285, E291, L330, L333, S289, R288, E259, I326, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M364, M329, M348, F363, Y327
PE000515−10.65±1.02S289, R288, L228, S342, R280L228, L330, G258, E259, S289, R288, I326, I341, S342, I281, R280, M364, M348, F287, K263, I262, F247, I267, H266, K265, F264, P227, I249, C285, E295, A292
PE000052−10.62±0.94C285H449, C285, L330, L333, G284, S289, R288, E259, I326, I341, F264, I281, R280, M364, M348, F363, Y327
PE000281−10.57±0.59S289, R288, H449H449, V339, F264, L330, L333, S289, R288, L340, I341, R280, I281, I326, M364, C285, G284, Y327
PE000058−10.57±1.12S289, R288, L228K263, P227, V339, K265, A292, L228, L330, L333, S289, R288, C285, I326, I341, S342, F264, I281, M364, E295, M348, F287, E291
PE000613−10.57±0.84S289, R288, H449, C285, E343L330, L333, G258, E259, V277, L255, S289, R288, L340, I341, S342, E343, I281, R280, F282, C285, F363, H449, I262, F264, I249, M348, L476, I326
PE000239−10.54±0.80S289, R288V339, R280, C285, F264, L330, L333, S289, R288, L228, E259, L340, I341, S342, E343, P227, I326, M364, E295, A292, E291
PE000090−10.46±0.92R288, S342F264, L333, R288, E259, I341, S342, V277, I281, R280, M329, G284
PE000370−10.43±0.98S289, R288K265, A292, L330, L333, S289, R288, I326, I341, S342, F264, I281, M329, M348, G284, F287, C285
PE000385−10.40±1.01R288V339, F264, L330, L333, R288, L228, I326, I341, E343, I281, M364, M329, A292, G284
PE000091−10.39±1.01R288, C285, S342H449, V339, I262, C285, L330, L333, S289, R288, L340, I341, S342, F264, I281, I326, M364, M329, M348, G284, Y327
PE000787−10.38±0.66R288, S342C285, F264, L330, L333, S289, R288, E259, L340, I341, S342, R280, I281, I326, M329, M348, G284, L255
PE000257−10.37±0.69S289, S342K263, C285, S289, R288, E259, I267, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M348, G284, F287
PE000144−10.33±0.60R288, S342I249, I262, C285, R288, E259, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M364, M348, L255
PE000089−10.24±0.70S289, R288, S342L330, S289, R288, I326, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M364, C285
PE000286−10.21±0.39R288, K265, S342V339, L330, L333, E259, R288, I341, S342, E343, I281, M364, C285, G284, F287, K263, K265, F264, P227, I249, M348, F363, L353, A292, E291
PE000824−10.16±0.92S289, R288, S342V339, C285, F264, L330, S289, R288, E259, I326, I341, S342, V277, I281, R280, M364, M348, L255
PE000511−10.15±0.75S289, R288, S342V339, L330, L333, E259, S289, R288, L340, I341, S342, I281, I326, M364, C285, G284, Y327, I262, F264, I249, M348, E295, A292, E291
PE000023−10.13±1.00S289, R288, H449H449, V339, C285, L330, L333, S289, R288, L353, I341, S342, F264, I281, I326, M364, F282, M348, G284
PE000258−10.11±0.73R288, C285I249, I262, M348, F264, G258, S289, R288, G346, E259, I341, S342, V277, I281, R280, A292, L255
PE000788−10.08±0.45S289, S342C285, L330, S289, R288, I326, I341, S342, F264, I281, M364, A292
PE001043−10.05±0.68S342K265, I262, F264, K263, R288, E259, I267, I341, S342, E343, R280, M348, G284, F287
PE000422−10.05±0.54S342K265, R288, I262, F247, G258, K263, Q345, G346, E259, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, C285, G284, F287, L255
PE000546−10.04±0.65R288, C285, S342, R280V339, L330, E259, S289, R288, I326, I341, S342, I281, R280, M364, C285, G284, F287, K263, I262, I267, H266, K265, F264, I249, M348
PE000056−10.03±0.56S342C285, L228, L330, L333, R288, E259, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M364, M329, A292
PE000243−9.98±0.59S289, S342V339, L330, E259, S289, R288, I341, S342, I281, R280, M364, F282, C285, F363, F287, G361, K263, I262, K265, F264, M348, L356, L353, F360
PE000088−9.98±0.98S289, R288L228, L330, L333, S289, R288, I326, E343, M364, C285, F363, E291

Notes: The name of each ligand has been taken from the Phenol-Explorer 3.6 database (http://phenol-explorer.eu/). A table with the data of all phenolic compounds used in the docking calculations is available as Supplementary material 2 in a Microsoft Excel file.

Abbreviations: PEln, Phenol Explorer ligand name; Feb, free energy variation for binding; H-bir, H-bonds interacting residues; VdWir, van der Waals interacting residues; hPPARγ, human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; SD, standard deviation.

Table 2

Molecular docking analysis for scutellarin-related compounds showing estimated binding free energy variation30 and interacting residues24 of potential modulators compounds in the binding site of hPPARγ

PlnFeb (mean ± SD, kcal/mol)H-birVdWir
Scutellarin−9.21±0.40R288H449, E295, C285, L330, L333, S289, R288, L340, I341, I326, M364, M329, A292, Y327
72358734−10.75±0.60S289, R288V339, F247, I262, I249, G258, L330, L333, S289, R288, G346, E259, I326, I341, S342, I281, R280, M364, M329, A292, L255
59687997−10.75±0.55S289, R288V339, L330, L333, G258, E259, Q345, S289, R288, G346, I326, I341, S342, I281, R280, M364, M329, M348, I262, F247, I249, C285, A292
59687973−10.74±0.58S289, R288V339, F247, I262, I249, G258, L330, L333, S289, R288, G346, E259, I326, I341, S342, I281, R280, M364, M329, A292, L255
72358745−10.71±0.63S289, R288V339, L330, L333, G258, E259, Q345, S289, R288, G346, I326, I341, S342, I281, R280, M364, M329, M348, I262, F247, I249, C285, A292
11734548−10.45±0.58S289, R288I249, F247, R288, A292, G258, S289, Q345, G346, I326, I341, I262, F264, I281, M348, G284, L255
72383197−10.44±0.65S342E295, C285, L330, I267, R288, E259, I326, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M364, M329, A292, G284
75112563−10.43±0.69L228P227, I249, K265, I262, C285, F264, L330, L333, L255, R288, L228, I341, S342, E343, I281, M329, M348, G284, F287, E291
58653000−10.42±0.60S289, R288, S342, R280I267, P227, T268, I262, C285, S289, R288, E259, I326, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, P269, E295, A292, E291
58652685−10.39±0.48R288F247, R288, C285, G258, L330, L333, Q345, G346, E259, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M348, G284, I262, L255
72383069−10.39±0.47R288I249, F247, R288, C285, G258, L330, L333, Q345, G346, E259, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M348, G284, I262, L255
58446486−10.37±0.94S289, R288V339, L228, L330, L333, L255, S289, R288, I326, I341, S342, E343, I281, M329, C285, G284, F287, I262, K265, F264, P227, I249, M348, E291
52920637−10.37±0.74S289L330, G258, E259, V277, L255, Q345, S289, R288, G346, I326, I341, S342, I281, R280, M364, C285, G284, I262, F247, F264, I249, M348, F363
44258208−10.36±0.79R288, C285, S342V339, L330, L333, E259, V277, M256, L255, S289, R288, L340, I341, S342, I281, R280, M364, F282, C285, F363, F360, Y327, H449, F264, M348, L356, L353, I326
45376716−10.30±0.70S342E295, C285, L330, I267, R288, E259, I326, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M364, M329, A292, G284
73804009−10.29±0.60R288, S342I249, F247, I262, A292, G258, L330, S289, R288, G346, I326, I341, S342, I281, R280, M364, M329, M348, F363, C285
75130939−10.29±0.60R288, S342F247, R288, I249, G258, L330, L333, Q345, G346, E259, I341, I262, F264, I281, R280, M364, C285, G284
58446464−10.27±0.94V339, L330, L333, G258, E259, Q345, S289, R288, G346, I326, I341, S342, I281, R280, M364, M329, M348, I262, F247, I249, C285, A292
45783244−10.26±0.70R288, S342F247, R288, I249, G258, L330, L333, Q345, G346, E259, I326, I341, I262, F264, I281, R280, M364, M329, C285, G284
72383144−10.25±0.60S289, S342P227, C285, L330, L333, S289, R288, E259, I267, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M364, E295, A292, G284, E291
77916000−10.24±0.65R288, S342, R280V339, F264, L330, L333, I267, R288, E259, L340, I341, R280, I281, I326, M329, C285, G284, H266
76788563−10.23±0.82C285, L228L228, L330, L333, L255, S289, R288, I326, I341, S342, I281, M364, M329, C285, G284, F287, Y327, I262, K265, F264, P227, I249, M348, F363, E295, A292
44258121−10.23±0.54V339, R288, F247, G258, L330, L333, Q345, G346, E259, I326, I341, S342, F264, I281, M364, M329, I249, G284, I262, L255
58652855−10.22±0.64S289, S342C285, L330, L333, S289, R288, E259, I267, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M364, E295, A292, G284, E291
74819302−10.21±0.48R288F247, R288, A292, G258, L333, S289, Q345, G346, E259, I326, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M348, G284, I262, L255
25242967−10.21±0.63R288C285, F264, L330, L333, P227, R288, L228, E259, I341, E343, I281, R280, M364, M348, G284, E291
73829955−10.21±0.61R288, S342, R280I249, I262, M348, L333, S289, R288, E259, I267, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, A292, G284, C285
74819395−10.19±0.52L228C285, L228, L330, P227, R288, E259, I267, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M348, G284, E291
10929914−10.18±0.70S342, L228V339, L228, L330, P227, R288, E259, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M364, C285, E291
25265783−10.18±0.47R280, S342T268, V339, I262, A292, L330, L333, R288, E259, I267, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M364, M329, M348, G284, C285
75130940−10.17±0.71R288, S342F247, R288, I249, G258, L330, L333, Q345, G346, E259, I326, I341, I262, F264, I281, R280, M364, M329, C285, G284
74819394−10.17±0.89S342V339, L330, L333, S289, R288, I326, I341, S342, E343, I281, M364, M329, C285, F287, K263, K265, F264, P227, M348, L353, E295, A292, E291
76788584−10.15±0.52S289, R288, S342L228, L330, L333, G258, E259, L255, Q345, S289, R288, G346, I341, S342, I281, R280, M329, M348, G284, K263, I262, F247, K265, F264, I249, C285, A292
42607981−10.14±0.53R288, C285, S342, R280I262, C285, L228, L330, L333, R288, E259, I267, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M329, M348, G284
76788577−10.13±1.13V339, K265, L330, L333, R288, I326, I341, S342, F264, I281, M364, M329, C285, G284, F287, E291
75994856−10.13±0.48R288, C285, S342F282, R288, C285, L330, L333, G284, S289, L356, L353, I341, S342, F264, I281, M364, M329, M348, F363, F360
3825119−10.13±0.56R288V339, C285, L330, L333, R288, E259, I326, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M364, M329, M348, G284
78412674−10.13±0.51S289, C285, A292, S342P227, C285, L330, L333, S289, R288, E259, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M364, E295, A292, E291
44257827−10.12±0.54I249, F247, R288, L255, A292, G258, L330, S289, Q345, G346, E259, I326, I341, S342, F264, I281, M364, M329, M348, I262, C285
75038437−10.12±0.48V339, K265, L330, L333, R288, I326, I341, S342, F264, I281, M364, M329, C285, G284, F287, E291
73829935−10.11±0.52R288, C285I249, F247, R288, C285, G258, L330, L333, Q345, G346, E259, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M364, M348, G284, I262, L255
74819365−10.11±0.45R288, C285, S342I267, P227, E295, V339, C285, L228, L330, L333, S289, R288, E259, I326, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M364, M329, A292
76645318−10.10±0.67S289, R288L330, L333, G258, E259, V277, L255, S289, R288, G346, L340, I341, S342, I281, R280, M364, M329, M348, I262, F247, F264, I249, C285, E295, A292
58446460−10.10±0.75R288, S342T268, L228, L330, L333, R288, E259, I267, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M364, M329, C285
76389099−10.09±0.65R288, S342I267, V339, A292, L330, S289, R288, E259, I326, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M364, M329, M348, G284, C285
46895651−10.09±0.54R288I249, F247, R288, A292, G258, L333, S289, Q345, G346, E259, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M348, G284, I262, L255
25242966−10.09±0.65A292V339, L330, L333, S289, R288, I326, I341, S342, I281, M364, F282, C285, G284, F360, Y327, H449, K263, K265, F264, M348, F363, L356, L353, A292, E291
44258026−10.09±0.67S289, S342A292, L228, L330, L333, S289, R288, L255, E259, I326, I341, S342, F264, R280, M364, M329, M348, C285
74819374−10.08±0.99R288, S342, R280F264, L330, L333, E259, S289, R288, I326, I341, S342, I281, R280, M364, M329, C285, G284, I267, L228, T268, M348, E295, A292, E291
45783243−10.08±0.48S289, C285, A292, S342P227, C285, L330, L333, S289, R288, E259, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M364, E295, A292, E291
6479876−10.08±0.69R288C285, F264, L330, P227, R288, L228, E259, I341, E343, I281, R280, M364, M329, M348, G284
56658537−10.08±0.47R280, S342I262, F264, L330, L333, R288, E259, I267, I341, S342, V277, I281, R280, M364, M329, I249, G284, L255
73880628−10.08±0.74R288, S342, R280I267, V339, A292, L330, S289, R288, E259, I326, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M364, M329, M348, G284, C285
44258122−10.08±0.50S289, R280I267, P227, E259, A292, F264, L330, S289, R288, L228, C285, I326, I341, E343, I281, R280, M364, M348, G284, E291
42607923−10.08±0.67S289, R280, S342I267, T268, M329, I262, P227, L228, S289, R288, E259, I326, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, P269, E295, C285, G284, E291
74412840−10.08±1.06R288, L228, R280T268, E295, C285, P227, L228, L330, L333, I267, R288, E259, I326, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M329, A292, E291
22297406−10.07±0.75S289, R288, S342I267, V339, I262, F264, L330, L333, S289, R288, E259, L340, I341, R280, I281, I326, M329, C285, G284
74978257−10.07±0.68R280V339, L330, L333, E259, V277, L255, S289, R288, I326, I341, S342, I281, R280, M364, C285, G284, Y327, H449, I262, I267, F264, M348, F363, A292
74439012−10.07±0.49F264, L330, R288, L228, E259, I326, I341, E343, I281, R280, M364, M329, C285, G284, E291
72193650−10.06±0.62R280V339, I249, C285, F264, L330, L333, I267, R288, E259, L340, I341, S342, R280, I281, I326, M329, M348, G284
73829954−10.05±0.67S342I262, C285, F264, L330, P227, R288, L228, E259, I326, I341, S342, E343, I281, R280, M364, M329, M348, G284, E291
57859671−10.05±0.76R288, S342T268, E295, C285, L228, L330, L333, R288, E259, I267, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M364, M329, A292, G284
636812−10.04±0.60R288, R280V339, I249, I262, E259, A292, L330, L333, R288, C285, I267, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, M364, E295, M348, G284, E291
75579957−10.04±0.51R288V339, L228, L330, L333, L340, S289, R288, I326, I341, I281, R280, M364, F282, M348, G284, F360, F264, F226, M329, C285, F363, L356, L353, E295, A292
42607980−10.04±0.78S289, R288V339, L333, G258, E259, L255, Q345, S289, R288, G346, L340, I341, S342, I281, I326, M364, C285, G284, I262, F247, F264, I249, M348
44258207−10.03±0.62R280I267, V339, F264, L330, L333, G284, S289, R288, E259, L353, I341, S342, R280, I281, I326, M364, T268, C285, F363, Y327
44259194−10.03±0.75V339, L330, L333, E259, S289, R288, I326, I341, I281, R280, M364, F282, C285, G284, F360, Y327, F264, M348, F363, L356, L353, A292, E291
74819398−10.03±0.65S289, R288, C285H449, I249, F247, R288, C285, G258, L330, S289, Q345, G346, E259, I326, I341, S342, I281, R280, M364, M348, F363, I262, Y327
21576514−10.02±0.68R280, S342L330, L333, G258, E259, L255, Q345, R288, G346, I341, S342, I281, R280, M364, M348, G284, I262, F247, I267, F264, P269, T268, I249, E291
78004334−10.02±0.57S289, R288, S342I267, K263, K265, E259, M348, S289, R288, C285, I326, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, A292, G284, F287, E291
75994517−10.01±0.61S342V339, G258, E259, R288, G346, I341, S342, I281, R280, M364, F282, C285, F363, F287, K263, I262, F247, I267, K265, F264, T268, I249, M348, L356, L353, F360, E291
10984998−10.01±0.62S342K265, I262, F264, K263, R288, E259, I267, I341, S342, E343, I281, M348, G284, F287, L255
42607908−10.00±0.50S289, R288P227, F264, L330, L333, S289, R288, L228, I326, I341, E343, I281, M364, M329, A292, G284
42607577−10.00±0.67R288, Y327, R280V339, L330, L333, E259, S289, R288, I326, I341, S342, I281, R280, M364, F282, C285, F363, F360, Y327, I262, I267, F264, T268, M348, L356, L353
73981585−9.99±0.77R280I267, A292, L330, S289, R288, E259, I326, I341, F264, I281, R280, M364, M329, M348, G284, C285
74412839−9.98±0.66R280, S342, L228P227, T268, I262, L228, L333, I267, R288, E259, I326, I341, S342, F264, I281, R280, P269, E295, C285, G284
73802639−9.98±0.97R280, S342L330, L333, G258, E259, L255, Q345, R288, G346, I341, S342, I281, R280, M364, M329, M348, G284, I262, F247, I267, F264, P269, T268, I249, E291
73079170−9.98±0.66S342K265, I262, F264, K263, R288, E259, I267, I341, S342, E343, I281, R280, T268, G284, F287
56777503−9.96±0.56V339, F247, R288, I249, G258, L330, L333, Q345, G346, E259, I326, I341, S342, F264, I281, M364, M329, M348, G284, I262, L255
75994928−9.96±0.64S342G258, E259, R288, I341, S342, I281, R280, M364, F282, C285, F363, F287, K263, I262, I267, K265, F264, P269, T268, I249, L356, L353, F360, E291
73037135−9.95±0.64S342V339, K265, C285, F264, L330, L333, K263, R288, I326, I341, S342, E343, I281, M364, M329, M348, G284, F287, E291
75579959−9.95±0.64S289, R288S289, K265, K263, C285, F264, L330, L333, G344, R288, L228, L353, I341, S342, E343, I281, R280, M364, M348, F363, F287, E291
74819217−9.95±0.60S342L333, G258, E259, L255, Q345, R288, G346, L340, I341, S342, I281, R280, C285, G284, F287, K263, I262, F247, K265, F264, I249, M348

Notes: The name of each ligand has been taken from the PubChem database (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). A table with the data of all PubChem compounds used in the docking calculations is available as Supplementary material 3 in a Microsoft Excel file.

Abbreviations: Pln, PubChem ligand name; Feb, free energy variation for binding; H-bir, H-bonds interacting residues; VdWir, van der Waals interacting residues; hPPARγ, human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; SD, standard deviation.

Table 1 includes 32 phenolic compounds with free energy variation ranging from −10.0±0.9 to −11.4±0.9 kcal/mol, which are stronger compared with the calculated ΔG values for many phenolic compounds with experimentally demonstrated affinity for hPPARγ1 that were used as the reference set. The phenolic compounds included in Table 2 of the paper published by Wang et al1 bind to purified hPPARγ in the micromolar range, and our calculated ΔG values for these compounds ranged from −8.8±0.7 (PE000404 – genistein) to −7.5±0.4 kcal/mol (PE000592 – resveratrol). The ΔG values of other polyphenols that were within this range are the following: −8.2±0.5 (PE000229 – luteolin), −8.0±0.5 (PE000291 – quercetin), −8.0±0.5 (PE000290 – kaempferol), −7.7±0.6 (PE000124 – catechin), −7.8±0.3 (PE000104 – 2′-OH-chalcone), −8.2±0.5 (PE000397 – biochanin A), −7.8±0.5 (PE000905 – 6-OH-daidzein), and −7.5±0.2 (PE000848 – 6′-OH-O-desmethylangolensin). Interestingly, the other 175 tested polyphenols were found to have ΔG values ranging from −9.0±0.4 to −9.9±0.7 kcal/mol (full table in Supplementary material 2), indicating that these may represent a potential source for new hPPARγ modulators. This second set of polyphenols includes scutellarin (−9.2±0.4 kcal/mol), a phenolic compound that presents antiadipogenic activity through the modulation of PPARγ in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes22 and a reference compound that can be used to construct a structure-related chemical library that can be used in the docking experiments performed in this study. Table 2 includes 83 scutellarin structure-related compounds (full table in Supplementary material 3) with free energy variations ranging from −10.0±0.6 to −11.0±0.6 kcal/mol; additionally, 2,772 compounds presented variations in the range of −9.0±0.6 to −9.9±0.5 kcal/mol. Among these, 179 satisfied Lipinski’s Rule of Five in evaluating drug-likeness in the PubChem database (http://goo.gl/NnQ4UR), 14 compounds have been tested for biological properties (http://goo.gl/xbkcEk), and 110 compounds can be obtained from a commercial source (http://goo.gl/LTZLQ1).

Prediction of ADMET profiles

Both for the development of drugs and for the environmental risk assessment of drug candidates, it is necessary to know the ADMET properties32 of pesticides and chemicals used in industrial chemistry. Because the experimental evaluation of ADMET is very costly and time-consuming, the application of computational techniques to predict ADMET profiles is a useful solution. The prediction of good ADMET profiles of drug candidates can help eliminate compounds with unacceptable side effects. We calculated ADMET profiles using free online applications32 (http://lmmd.ecust.edu.cn:8000/predict/). A limitation to the use of these applications is that the user must manually enter the chemical formula of each compound. To avoid this problem, we developed a Python script that uses the SMILE code of the compound as input and automatically obtains the calculated ADMET profile. Positive ADMET profiles for the compounds with the best calculated free energy variations (the first selection criterion) constitute a second selection criterion for the final proposed candidates of PPARγ modulators. For ease of understanding, we present the ADMET profiles as ADME values (Tables 3 and 4 show the predicted molecular pharmacokinetic properties of the selected phenolic compounds of the Phenol Explorer database and scutellarin-related compounds, respectively) and toxicity profiles (Tables 5 and 6 show the results of the toxicity assessment of selected compounds of the Phenol Explorer database and scutellarin-related compounds, respectively). A full table with the ADME and toxicity profiles of all of the compounds used in the docking experiments is available as supplemental material (Supplementary material 2 and Supplementary material 3).
Table 3

Predicted molecular pharmacokinetic properties of selected compounds against hPPARγ from Phenol Explorer database21

CompoundADME
BBBHIACaco-2 permeabilityCaco-2 permeability (LogPapp, cm/s)Aqueous solubility (LogS)P-gp substrateP-gp inhibitor IP-gp inhibitor IICYP450 2C9 substrateCYP450 2D6 substrateCYP450 3A4 substrateCYP450 1A2 inhibitorCYP450 2C9 inhibitorCYP450 2D6 inhibitorCYP450 2C19 inhibitorCYP450 3A4 inhibitorCYP IPROCT
Scutellarin+−0.6443−3.462+Low
PE000149+−0.2487−3.2123++Low
PE000143+−1.0679−3.3694+Low
PE000095−0.5151−2.8337++Low
PE000086−0.8061−2.6328+High
PE000075−0.398−2.935++Low
PE000515−0.3752−1.84+Low
PE000052−0.5151−2.8337++Low
PE000281+−1.066−2.4368+Low
PE000058−0.5151−2.8337++Low
PE000613+−0.5573−2.2303+High
PE000239+−0.6443−3.462+Low
PE000090−0.5756−2.5201++High
PE000370−0.5327−2.8921++Low
PE000385+−0.5327−2.8921++Low
PE000091−0.8061−2.6328+High
PE000787+−0.9694−3.3193+Low
PE000257+−0.9863−1.9028+Low
PE000144+−0.8602−3.3141+Low
PE000089−0.4745−2.6141++High
PE000286+−0.7176−2.757+Low
PE000824+−0.8286−2.2638+Low
PE000511−0.4946−1.5038+Low
PE000023−0.8874−2.3343+Low
PE000258+−1.0492−2.2426+Low
PE000788+−0.6572−3.1192+Low
PE001043+−0.9634−3.444++Low
PE000422−0.7317−2.5895+Low
PE000546+−0.3813−2.6507+Low
PE000056−0.7314−2.8337+Low
PE000243+−0.6508−2.7724+Low
PE000088−0.7988−2.3781+Low

Notes: Supplementary material 2 includes ADME profile for 924 compound of Phenol Explorer database. All parameters have been calculated using http://lmmd.ecust.edu.cn:8000/predict/site.

Abbreviations: ADME, absorption distributions metabolism elimination; BBB, blood–brain barrier; HIA, human intestinal absorption; P-gp, P-glycoprotein; CYP450, cytochrome P450; CYP IP, cytochrome P450 inhibitory promiscuity; ROCT, renal organic cation transporter; hPPARγ, human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma.

Table 4

Predicted molecular pharmacokinetic properties of selected compounds against hPPARγ from scutellarin-related compounds chemical library

CompoundADME
BBBHIACaco-2 permeabilityCaco-2 permeability (LogPapp, cm/s)Aqueous solubility (LogS)P-gp substrateP-gp inhibitor IP-gp inhibitor IICYP450 2C9 substrateCYP450 2D6 substrateCYP450 3A4 substrateCYP450 1A2 inhibitorCYP450 2C9 inhibitorCYP450 2D6 inhibitorCYP450 2C19 inhibitorCYP450 3A4 inhibitorCYP IPROCT
Scutellarin+−0.6443−3.462+Low
72358734+−0.3119−3.95++Low
59687997+−0.3119−3.95++Low
59687973+−0.3119−3.95++Low
72358745+−0.3119−3.95++Low
11734548+0.0899−3.9468+++High
72383197+−0.3119−3.95++Low
75112563+−0.9637−3.2543+Low
58653000+−0.3119−3.95++Low
58652685+−0.3119−3.95++Low
72383069+−0.3119−3.95++Low
58446486+−0.9637−3.2543+Low
52920637+−0.3114−3.4974+Low
44258208+−0.1313−3.1698++Low
45376716+−0.9637−3.2543+Low
73804009+−0.9415−3.094+Low
75130939+−0.9415−3.094+Low
58446464+−0.9637−3.2543+Low
45783244+−0.9415−3.094+Low
72383144+−0.3119−3.95++Low
77916000+−0.9415−3.094+Low
76788563+−0.9637−3.2543+Low
44258121+−0.9415−3.094+Low
58652855+−0.3119−3.95++Low
74819302++−0.7559−2.7909+Low
25242967+−0.4177−3.1399+Low
73829955+−0.9415−3.094+Low
74819395+−0.9415−3.094+Low
10929914+−0.4714−3.726+Low
25265783+−0.647−3.2594+Low
75130940+−0.9415−3.094+Low
74819394+−0.9415−3.094+Low
76788584+−0.9637−3.2543+Low
42607981+−0.9415−3.094+Low
76788577+−0.9637−3.2543+Low
75994856++−0.6585−3.736+Low
3825119+−0.3114−3.3018+Low
78412674++−0.426−3.9023+++Low
44257827+−0.9415−3.094+Low
75038437+−0.638−2.8655+Low
73829935+−0.8798−3.0475+Low
74819365+−0.9521−2.8549+Low
76645318+−0.1045−3.3068++Low
58446460+−0.9637−3.2543+Low
76389099+−0.5903−2.9011++Low
46895651+++0.7197−4.2161++++Low
25242966+−0.647−3.2594+Low
44258026+−0.1313−3.1698++Low
74819374−0.7693−3.0348+Low
45783243+−0.9415−3.094+Low
6479876++−0.426−3.9023+++Low
56658537+−0.5903−2.9011++Low
73880628+−0.6917−2.9022+Low
44258122+−0.6917−2.9022+Low
42607923−0.7693−3.0348+Low
74412840+−0.4177−3.1399+Low
22297406+−0.6917−2.9022+Low
74978257+−0.4128−3.2451++Low
74439012+−0.647−3.2594+Low
72193650+−0.69172.9022+Low
73829954+−0.6917−2.9022+Low
57859671+−0.1045−3.3068++Low
636812+−0.6917−2.9022+Low
75579957++−0.8161−3.9454+Low
42607980+−0.9415−3.094+Low
44258207+−0.2323−2.9444++Low
44259194+−0.9711−3.1116+Low
74819398+−0.9521−2.8549+Low
21576514+−0.1313−3.1698++Low
78004334+−0.2724−2.9062++Low
75994517++−0.5021−3.8832+Low
10984998++0.2421−4.0211+++High
42607908+−0.9521−2.8549+Low
42607577++−0.45−2.1632+Low
73981585+−0.5924−2.8041+Low
74412839+−0.647−3.2594+Low
73802639+−0.1313−3.1698++Low
73079170+0.0899−3.9468+++High
56777503+−0.4128−2.6485++Low
75994928++−0.5021−3.8832+Low
73037135+−0.2255−3.1749++Low
75579959++−0.8293−4.0868+Low
74819217+−0.45−2.1632+Low

Notes: Compound names are from PubChem database.26 Supplementary material 3 includes ADME profile for 10,437 scutellarin-related compounds. All parameters have been calculated using the http://lmmd.ecust.edu.cn:8000/predict/site.

Abbreviations: ADME, absorption distributions metabolism elimination; BBB, blood–brain barrier; HIA, human intestinal absorption; P-gp, P-glycoprotein; CYP450, cytochrome P450; CYP IP, cytochrome P450 inhibitory promiscuity; ROCT, renal organic cation transporter; hPPARγ, human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma.

Table 5

Predicted toxicity assessment of selected compounds against hPPARγ from Phenol Explorer database21

CompoundToxicity profile
MutagenicaTumorigenicaReaIrritantaHEaggRGI IbHEaggRGI IbAMES toxicitybCarcinogensbFT (pLC50, mg/L)bTPT (pIGC50, μg/L)bHoney bee toxicitybBiodegradationbAcute oral toxicitybCarcinogenicity (three-class)bRAT (LD50, mol/kg)b
ScutellarinNoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.5766High, 0.8765HighIINonrequired2.7357
PE000149NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.8879High, 0.5562HighIVNonrequired2.4019
PE000143NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.795High, 0.7168HighIVNonrequired2.6693
PE000095NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.5839High, 0.817HighIIINonrequired2.6968
PE000086NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.4549High, 0.7176HighIIINonrequired2.7538
PE000075NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.5525High, 0.8199HighIIINonrequired2.8383
PE000515NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 1.0377High, 0.6313HighIIINonrequired2.4319
PE000052NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.5839High, 0.817HighIIINonrequired2.6968
PE000281NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.9993High, 0.3809HighIIINonrequired2.7255
PE000058NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.5839High, 0.817HighIIINonrequired2.6968
PE000613NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 1.3132High, 0.2999HighIIINonrequired2.5151
PE000239NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.5766High, 0.8765HighIINonrequired2.7357
PE000090NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.4443High, 0.7266HighIIINonrequired2.8163
PE000370NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.7803High, 0.581HighIIINonrequired2.6133
PE000385NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.7803High, 0.581HighIIINonrequired2.6133
PE000091NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.4549High, 0.7176HighIIINonrequired2.7538
PE000787NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.9957High, 0.6702HighIVNonrequired2.4103
PE000257NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 1.0289High, 0.5049HighIIINonrequired2.7026
PE000144NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.726High, 0.6679HighIVNonrequired2.6643
PE000089NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.3962High, 0.7186HighIIINonrequired2.9831
PE000286NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 1.035High, 0.5666HighIIINonrequired2.6398
PE000824NoneNoneNoneNoneWeak+High, 1.1967High, 0.2451HighIIINonrequired2.0375
PE000511NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 1.0121High, 0.5418HighIIINonrequired2.3222
PE000023NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 1.3696High, 0.1194HighIIINonrequired1.9817
PE000258NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 1.1013High, 0.4888HighIIINonrequired2.8818
PE000788NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 1.0585High, 0.7946HighIIINonrequired2.2375
PE001043NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, −0.4159High, 0.956HighIIINonrequired3.2733
PE000422NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.9612High, 0.6349HighIIINonrequired2.4798
PE000546NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, −0.3223High, 1.1936HighIIINonrequired2.679
PE000056NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.9981High, 0.4333HighIIINonrequired2.2818
PE000243NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.8074High, 0.5411HighIIINonrequired2.4984
PE000088NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.7642High, 0.5063HighIIINonrequired2.5566

Notes:

These parameters were calculated using OSIRIS property explorer (http://www.organic-chemistry.org/prog/peo/).

These parameters were calculated using http://lmmd.ecust.edu.cn:8000/predict/site. Supplementary material 2 includes toxicity profile for 924 compound of Phenol Explorer database.

Abbreviations: Re, reproductive effectiveness; HEaggRGI I, human ether-a-go-go-related gene inhibition I; HEaggRGI II, human ether-a-go-go-related gene inhibition II; FT, fish toxicity; TPT, Tetrahymena pyriformis toxicity; RAT, rat acute toxicity; LD50, amount of a compound, given all at once, which causes the death of 50% (one half) of a group of test rats; hPPARγ, human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma.

Table 6

Predicted toxicity assessment of selected compounds against hPPARγ from scutellarin-related chemical library

CompoundToxicity profile
MutagenicaTumorigenicaReaIrritantaHEaggRGI IbHEaggRGI IbAMES toxicitybCarcinogensbFT (pLC50, mg/L)bTPT (pIGC50, μg/L)bHoney bee toxicitybBiodegradationbAcute oral toxicitybCarcinogenicity (three-class)bRAT (LD50, mol/kg)b
ScutellarinNoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.5766High, 0.8765HighIINonrequired2.7357
72358734NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, −0.0897High, 1.2052HighIIINonrequired2.8804
59687997NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, −0.0897High, 1.2052HighIIINonrequired2.8804
59687973NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, −0.0897High, 1.2052HighIIINonrequired2.8804
72358745NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, −0.0897High, 1.2052HighIIINonrequired2.8804
11734548NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.1958High, 1.355HighIIINonrequired2.8906
72383197NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, −0.0897High, 1.2052HighIIINonrequired2.8804
75112563NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.7137High, 1.1182HighINonrequired3.2793
58653000NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, −0.0897High, 1.2052HighIIINonrequired2.8804
58652685NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, −0.0897High, 1.2052HighIIINonrequired2.8804
72383069NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, −0.0897High, 1.2052HighIIINonrequired2.8804
58446486NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.7137High, 1.1182HighINonrequired3.2793
52920637NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.6766High, 0.8401HighIIINonrequired2.5458
44258208NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.3454High, 1.0989HighIIINonrequired2.7831
45376716NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.7137High, 1.1182HighINonrequired3.2793
73804009NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.4122High, 0.8952HighIIINonrequired2.8825
75130939NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.4122High, 0.8952HighIIINonrequired2.8825
58446464NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.7137High, 1.1182HighINonrequired3.2793
45783244NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.4122High, 0.8952HighIIINonrequired2.8825
72383144NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, −0.0897High, 1.2052HighIIINonrequired2.8804
77916000NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.4122High, 0.8952HighIIINonrequired2.8825
76788563NoneNoneNoneNoneWeak+High, 0.7137High, 1.1182HighINonrequired3.2793
44258121NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.4122High, 0.8952HighIIINonrequired2.8825
58652855NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, −0.0897High, 1.2052HighIIINonrequired2.8804
74819302NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, −0.0832High, 0.8121HighIIINonrequired2.9961
25242967NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.257High, 0.7195HighIIINonrequired3.001
73829955NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.4122High, 0.8952HighIIINonrequired2.8825
74819395NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.4122High, 0.8952HighIIINonrequired2.8825
10929914NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.1733High, 1.2094HighIIINonrequired2.706
25265783NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.1812High, 0.6914HighIIINonrequired3.1648
75130940NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.4122High, 0.8952HighIIINonrequired2.8825
74819394NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.4122High, 0.8952HighIIINonrequired2.8825
76788584NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.7137High, 1.1182HighINonrequired3.2793
42607981NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.4122High, 0.8952HighIIINonrequired2.8825
76788577NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.7137High, 1.1182HighINonrequired3.2793
75994856NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.3803High, 0.785HighIIINonrequired3.3046
3825119NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.7319High, 1.0022HighIIINonrequired2.5896
78412674NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, −0.0293High, 1.1449HighIINonrequired3.0214
44257827NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.4122High, 0.8952HighIIINonrequired2.8825
75038437NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.8895High, 0.5527HighIIINonrequired2.6408
73829935NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.8677High, 0.5539HighIIINonrequired2.7452
74819365NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.7363High, 0.6251HighIIINonrequired2.7048
76645318NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.5203High, 0.7729HighIIINonrequired2.8815
58446460NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.7137High, 1.1182HighINonrequired3.2793
76389099NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.5623High, 0.7513HighIIINonrequired2.6556
46895651NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.3736High, 0.8618HighIINonrequired3.875
25242966NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.1812High, 0.6914HighIIINonrequired3.1648
44258026NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.3454High, 1.0989HighIIINonrequired2.7831
74819374NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.5473High, 0.6801HighIIINonrequired3.0254
45783243NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.4122High, 0.8952HighIIINonrequired2.8825
6479876NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, −0.0293High, 1.1449HighIINonrequired3.0214
56658537NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.5623High, 0.7513HighIIINonrequired2.6556
73880628NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.4422High, 0.9205HighIIINonrequired2.8211
44258122NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.4422High, 0.9205HighIIINonrequired2.8211
42607923NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.5473High, 0.6801HighIIINonrequired3.0254
74412840NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.257High, 0.7195HighIIINonrequired3.001
22297406NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.4422High, 0.9205HighIIINonrequired2.8211
74978257NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.4502High, 0.9872HighIIINonrequired3.0446
74439012NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.1812High, 0.6914HighIIINonrequired3.1648
72193650NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.4422High, 0.9205HighIIINonrequired2.8211
73829954NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.4422High, 0.9205HighIIINonrequired2.8211
57859671NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.5203High, 0.7729HighIIINonrequired2.8815
636812NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.4422High, 0.9205HighIIINonrequired2.8211
75579957NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.4331High, 0.8693HighIIINonrequired3.1475
42607980NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.4122High, 0.8952HighIIINonrequired2.8825
44258207NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.5467High, 0.8373HighIIINonrequired2.6137
44259194NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.3116High, 0.9333HighIIINonrequired2.6647
74819398NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.7363High, 0.6251HighIIINonrequired2.7048
21576514NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.3454High, 1.0989HighIIINonrequired2.7831
78004334NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.8594High, 0.6919HighIIINonrequired2.7287
75994517NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.6197High, 0.9017HighIIINonrequired3.3033
10984998NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.2453High, 1.2941HighIIINonrequired2.9952
42607908NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.7363High, 0.6251HighIIINonrequired2.7048
42607577NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.1287High, 0.8537HighIIINonrequired2.9438
73981585NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 1.0595High, 0.5675HighIIINonrequired2.3366
74412839NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.1812High, 0.6914HighIIINonrequired3.1648
73802639NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.3454High, 1.0989HighIIINonrequired2.7831
73079170NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.1958High, 1.355HighIIINonrequired2.8906
56777503NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.8428High, 0.5803HighIIINonrequired2.6228
75994928NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.6197High, 0.9017HighIIINonrequired3.3033
73037135NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.8824High, 0.7073HighIIINonrequired2.7704
75579959NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.2054High, 0.8567HighIIINonrequired3.5153
74819217NoneNoneNoneNoneWeakHigh, 0.1287High, 0.8537HighIIINonrequired2.9438

Notes: Compound names are from PubChem database.26 Supplementary material 3 include toxicity profile for 10,437 scutellarin-related compounds.

These parameters were calculated using OSIRIS property explorer (http://www.organic-chemistry.org/prog/peo/).

These parameters were calculated using http://lmmd.ecust.edu.cn:8000/predict/site.

Abbreviations: Re, reproductive effectiveness; HEaggRGI I, human ether-a-go-go-related gene inhibition I; HEaggRGI II, human ether-a-go-go-related gene inhibition II; FT, fish toxicity; TPT, Tetrahymena pyriformis toxicity; RAT, rat acute toxicity; LD50, amount of a compound, given all at once, which causes the death of 50% (one half) of a group of test rats; hPPARγ, human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma.

An ADME analysis includes the analysis of various properties such as ability to penetrate blood–brain barrier,43 capability of human intestinal absorption,43 Caco-2 permeability,44 and abilities to function as a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrate45 and inhibitor,46,47 renal organic cation transporter,48 and cytochrome P450 substrate49 and inhibitor.50 Almost all of the selected compounds showed positive results for human intestinal absorption but negative results for blood–brain barrier and Caco-2. The selected compounds showed no inhibitory side effects in terms of renal cation transport. Analysis of the ability of the compounds to serve as P-gp substrates showed that all of the selected ligands showed positive results and were identified as noninhibitors of P-gp. This predicted behavior for the selected compounds is similar to that of other compounds that have been proven to be hPPARγ activators, such as luteolin (PE000229), quercetin (PE000291), (+)-catechin (PE000124), 2′-OH-chalcone (PE000104), biochanin A (PE000397), genistein (PE000404), and 6-OH daidzein (PE000848). Cytochromes P450 are part of a ubiquitous superfamily of hemoproteins that are involved in various metabolic pathways in humans. In this context, we focused on the potential ability of some phenolic compounds to inhibit the capacity of Cyt P450 to catalyze the oxidation of drugs and other xenobiotics.51 These enzymes are predominantly expressed in the liver, but are also found in the small intestine (reducing drug bioavailability), lungs, placenta, and kidneys. Five isoforms, 1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4, are considered the most important in xenobiotic metabolism.52 The heme group conducts reactions that are often oxidation reactions, such as aliphatic and aromatic oxidations, heteroatom oxidations and N- and O-dealkylations. These reactions will mainly generate more soluble compounds that are more easily excreted.52 Most of the selected ligands (Tables 3 and 4) did not serve as substrates for all cytochrome substrates (2C9, 2D6, and 3A4), whereas some compounds (PE000095, PE000075, PE000052, PE000058, PE000090, PE000370, and PE000385) were found to act as substrates for cytochrome P450 3A4. Inhibitors of cytochrome P450 decrease the enzymatic activity of one or more cytochrome enzymes in a dose-dependent manner and promote the accumulation of drugs to toxic levels.53 It is therefore desirable that the selected compounds do not serve as inhibitors of cytochrome P450. Most of the compounds included in Tables 3 and 4 satisfy this condition. In the study of the prediction of toxicity profiles, several qualitative classification models, including mutagenicity,54 tumorigenicity,54 reproductive effectiveness,54 irritancy,54 human ether-a-go-go-related gene inhibition,32 Ames toxicity,32 carcinogenicity,32 fish toxicity,32 Tetrahymena pyriformis toxicity,32 honey bee toxicity,32 biodegradation,32 acute oral toxicity category,32 and acute rat toxicity32 were used. Tables 5 and 6 show the toxicity profiles of the selected compounds, and Supplementary materials 2 and Supplementary materials 3 present information for all of the studied compounds. The toxicity profiles of the selected compounds revealed that most of the compounds were not mutagenic, carcinogenic, or tumorigenic. Similarly, the selected compounds were negative for Ames toxicity, weak inhibitors of human ether-a-go-go-related genes, and exhibit no properties that exert significant toxicity in humans. On the contrary, all of the selected compounds were found to present high toxicity for fish, T. pyriformis, and honey bees.

Conclusion

This in silico study shows that a variety of plant-derived polyphenols found in dietary sources may modulate the activity of hPPARγ more strongly than other compounds reported in the literature.1 The compounds described in this study showed strong theoretical binding affinity (free energy variations ranging from −10.0±0.9 to −11.4±0.9 kcal/mol), as determined by docking against the binding site of several X-ray structures of hPPARγ. These putative modulators presented several molecular interactions (Tables 1 and 2) with the binding site of the protein. Additionally, most of the selected compounds present favorable druggability and good ADMET properties. Taken together, the results of this computational study suggest that numerous plant-derived phenolic compounds, as well as other scutellarin-related compounds, can modulate the activity of hPPARγ. Although further cellular and in vivo investigations are required to confirm the physiological relevance of these results, these data highlight the potential of several phenolic compounds to become selective hPPARγ modulators able to alleviate obesity-related pathologies with reduced side effects compared with TZDs.
  51 in total

1.  Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations.

Authors:  Raphael Guerois; Jens Erik Nielsen; Luis Serrano
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-07-05       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Analysis of structure-based virtual screening studies and characterization of identified active compounds.

Authors:  Peter Ripphausen; Dagmar Stumpfe; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.808

3.  Activation of a member of the steroid hormone receptor superfamily by peroxisome proliferators.

Authors:  I Issemann; S Green
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-10-18       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Lead- and drug-like compounds: the rule-of-five revolution.

Authors:  Christopher A Lipinski
Journal:  Drug Discov Today Technol       Date:  2004-12

Review 5.  Peroxisomal beta-oxidation and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha: an adaptive metabolic system.

Authors:  J K Reddy; T Hashimoto
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.848

6.  ADME evaluation in drug discovery. 10. Predictions of P-glycoprotein inhibitors using recursive partitioning and naive Bayesian classification techniques.

Authors:  Lei Chen; Youyong Li; Qing Zhao; Hui Peng; Tingjun Hou
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Pharmacophore-driven identification of PPARγ agonists from natural sources.

Authors:  Rasmus K Petersen; Kathrine B Christensen; Andreana N Assimopoulou; Xavier Fretté; Vassilios P Papageorgiou; Karsten Kristiansen; Irene Kouskoumvekaki
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 8.  PPARγ signaling and metabolism: the good, the bad and the future.

Authors:  Maryam Ahmadian; Jae Myoung Suh; Nasun Hah; Christopher Liddle; Annette R Atkins; Michael Downes; Ronald M Evans
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  Systematic exploitation of multiple receptor conformations for virtual ligand screening.

Authors:  Giovanni Bottegoni; Walter Rocchia; Manuel Rueda; Ruben Abagyan; Andrea Cavalli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  PubChem: a public information system for analyzing bioactivities of small molecules.

Authors:  Yanli Wang; Jewen Xiao; Tugba O Suzek; Jian Zhang; Jiyao Wang; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  14 in total

1.  Molecular docking, 3D-QSAR and structural optimization on imidazo-pyridine derivatives dually targeting AT1 and PPARg.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Qing-Qing Hao; Xin Liu; Zhi Jing; Wen-Qing Jia; Shu-Qing Wang; Wei-Ren Xu; Xian-Chao Cheng; Run-Ling Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-11

2.  Looking for inhibitors of the dengue virus NS5 RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase using a molecular docking approach.

Authors:  Vicente Galiano; Pablo Garcia-Valtanen; Vicente Micol; José Antonio Encinar
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 3.  Multi-Targeted Molecular Effects of Hibiscus sabdariffa Polyphenols: An Opportunity for a Global Approach to Obesity.

Authors:  María Herranz-López; Mariló Olivares-Vicente; José Antonio Encinar; Enrique Barrajón-Catalán; Antonio Segura-Carretero; Jorge Joven; Vicente Micol
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-08-20       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  AMPK modulatory activity of olive-tree leaves phenolic compounds: Bioassay-guided isolation on adipocyte model and in silico approach.

Authors:  Cecilia Jiménez-Sánchez; Mariló Olivares-Vicente; Celia Rodríguez-Pérez; María Herranz-López; Jesús Lozano-Sánchez; Antonio Segura-Carretero; Alberto Fernández-Gutiérrez; José Antonio Encinar; Vicente Micol
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  New Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) Modulators Derived from Natural Product Databases and Marine Extracts by Using Molecular Docking Techniques.

Authors:  Verónica Ruiz-Torres; Maria Losada-Echeberría; Maria Herranz-López; Enrique Barrajón-Catalán; Vicente Galiano; Vicente Micol; José Antonio Encinar
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 5.118

Review 6.  An Updated Review on Marine Anticancer Compounds: The Use of Virtual Screening for the Discovery of Small-Molecule Cancer Drugs.

Authors:  Verónica Ruiz-Torres; Jose Antonio Encinar; María Herranz-López; Almudena Pérez-Sánchez; Vicente Galiano; Enrique Barrajón-Catalán; Vicente Micol
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  IFIT5 Participates in the Antiviral Mechanisms of Rainbow Trout Red Blood Cells.

Authors:  Veronica Chico; Maria Elizabhet Salvador-Mira; Ivan Nombela; Sara Puente-Marin; Sergio Ciordia; María Carmen Mena; Luis Perez; Julio Coll; Fanny Guzman; Jose Antonio Encinar; Luis Mercado; Maria Del Mar Ortega-Villaizan
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  Phytochemicals Mediate the Expression and Activity of OCTN2 as Activators of the PPARγ/RXRα Pathway.

Authors:  Jian Luo; Jian Qu; Rui Yang; Meng-Xue Ge; Yin Mei; Bo-Ting Zhou; Qiang Qu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Discovery of nonnucleoside inhibitors of polymerase from infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV).

Authors:  Melissa Bello-Pérez; Alberto Falcó; Vicente Galiano; Julio Coll; Luis Perez; José Antonio Encinar
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.162

10.  The LSD1 inhibitor iadademstat (ORY-1001) targets SOX2-driven breast cancer stem cells: a potential epigenetic therapy in luminal-B and HER2-positive breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Elisabet Cuyàs; Juan Gumuzio; Sara Verdura; Joan Brunet; Joaquim Bosch-Barrera; Begoña Martin-Castillo; Tomás Alarcón; José Antonio Encinar; Ángel G Martin; Javier A Menendez
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 5.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.