Literature DB >> 21917579

Association between lymph node evaluation for colon cancer and node positivity over the past 20 years.

Helen M Parsons1, Todd M Tuttle, Karen M Kuntz, James W Begun, Patricia M McGovern, Beth A Virnig.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Among patients surgically treated for colon cancer, better survival has been demonstrated in those with more lymph nodes evaluated. The presumed mechanism behind this association suggests that a more extensive lymph node evaluation reduces the risk of understaging, leading to improved survival.
OBJECTIVE: To further evaluate the mechanism behind lymph node evaluation and survival by examining the association between more extensive lymph node evaluation, identification of lymph node-positive cancers, and hazard of death.
DESIGN: Observational cohort study.
SETTING: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program data from 1988 through 2008. PATIENTS: 86,394 patients surgically treated for colon cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: We examined the relationship between lymph node evaluation and node positivity using Cochran-Armitage tests and multivariate logistic regression. The association between lymph node evaluation and hazard of death was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards modeling.
RESULTS: The number of lymph nodes evaluated increased from 1988 to 2008 but did not result in a significant overall increase in lymph node positivity. During 1988-1990, 34.6% of patients (3875/11,200) had 12 or more lymph nodes evaluated, increasing to 73.6% (9798/13,310) during 2006-2008 (P < .001); however, the proportion of node-positive cancers did not change with time (40% in 1988-1990, 42% in 2006-2008, P = .53). Although patients with high levels of lymph node evaluation were only slightly more likely to be node positive (adjusted odds ratio for 30-39 nodes vs 1-8 nodes, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02-1.20), these patients experienced significantly lower hazard of death compared with those with fewer nodes evaluated (adjusted hazard ratio for 30-39 nodes vs 1-8 nodes, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.62-0.71; unadjusted 5-year mortality, 35.3%).
CONCLUSION: The number of lymph nodes evaluated for colon cancer has markedly increased in the past 2 decades but was not associated with an overall shift toward higher-staged cancers, questioning the upstaging mechanism as the primary basis for improved survival in patients with more lymph nodes evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21917579     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.1285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  53 in total

1.  Effects of newly developed chemotherapy regimens, comorbidities, chemotherapy-related toxicities on the changing patterns of the leading causes of death in elderly patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  L Tong; C Ahn; E Symanski; D Lai; X L Du
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Ex Vivo Intra-arterial Methylene Blue Injection in Rectal Cancer Specimens Increases the Lymph-Node Harvest, Especially After Preoperative Radiation.

Authors:  Maria Münster; Uwe Hanisch; Muin Tuffaha; Rainer Kube; Henry Ptok
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Secular trends in colon and rectal cancer relative survival.

Authors:  Carolyn M Rutter; Eric A Johnson; Eric J Feuer; Amy B Knudsen; Karen M Kuntz; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  A nodal positivity constant: new perspectives in lymph node evaluation and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Niamh M Hogan; Desmond C Winter
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Lymph node evaluation for colon cancer in routine clinical practice: a population-based study.

Authors:  J C Del Paggio; S Nanji; X Wei; P H MacDonald; C M Booth
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  TNM staging of colorectal cancer should be reconsidered by T stage weighting.

Authors:  Jun Li; Bao-Cai Guo; Li-Rong Sun; Jian-Wei Wang; Xian-Hua Fu; Su-Zhan Zhang; Graeme Poston; Ke-Feng Ding
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Effects of Hospital Type and Distance on Lymph Node Assessment for Colon Cancer Among Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan Patients in Appalachia.

Authors:  Pamela Farley Short; John R Moran; Tse-Chuan Yang; Fabian Camacho; Niraj J Gusani; Heath B Mackley; Stephen A Matthews; Roger T Anderson
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.929

8.  The Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes Stratifies and Predicts Survival of High-Risk Individuals Among Stage III Rectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Christina W Lee; Katheryn H Wilkinson; Adam C Sheka; Glen E Leverson; Gregory D Kennedy
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-03-14

9.  The complexity of the count: considerations regarding lymph node evaluation in colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Laura J Denham; Justin C Kerstetter; Paul C Herrmann
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2012-12

10.  Time trends and disparities in lymphadenectomy for gastrointestinal cancer in the United States: a population-based analysis of 326,243 patients.

Authors:  A Dubecz; N Solymosi; M Schweigert; R J Stadlhuber; J H Peters; D Ofner; H J Stein
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.