Literature DB >> 26604069

Improved implantation rates of day 3 embryo transfers with the use of an automated time-lapse-enabled test to aid in embryo selection.

G David Adamson1, Mary E Abusief1, Lourella Palao1, Jennifer Witmer1, Lonyl M Palao1, Marina Gvakharia2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if an automated time-lapse test (TL-test) combined with traditional morphology for embryo selection and day 3 transfer results in improved clinical outcomes.
DESIGN: Prospective concurrent-controlled pilot study.
SETTING: IVF clinic and laboratory. PATIENT(S): A total of 319 female patients <41 years old, with day 3 embryo transfer, fewer than three failed IVF cycles, and at least four zygotes (2-pronuclear) on day 1. INTERVENTION(S): Automated time-lapse embryo assessment combined with morphologic assessment in the study (test) group compared with morphologic assessment only (control group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Embryo implantation, pregnancy, and multiple pregnancy rates. Subanalysis of implantation potential of embryos based on the TL-test (TL-high vs. TL-low) scores. RESULT(S): Implantation and clinical pregnancy rates were significantly higher in the test group compared with the control group (implantation rates 30.2% vs. 19.0%, clinical pregnancy rates 46.0% vs. 32.1%, respectively). Multiple pregnancy rates were not statistically different (26.7% vs. 18.3%). Test group patients receiving at least one TL-high embryo had significantly higher implantation rates than patients receiving only TL-low embryos (36.8% vs. 20.6%). TL-high compared with TL-low embryos had significantly higher implantation rates (44.7% vs. 20.5%). Among morphologically good embryos, TL-high embryos were more likely to implant than TL-low embryos (44.1% vs. 20.6%). CONCLUSION(S): This is the first report demonstrating improved implantation rates in patients receiving day 3 embryo transfers based on the combined use of a TL-test along and traditional morphology. Our findings confirm that the noninvasive TL-test adds valuable information to traditional morphologic grading. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01671657.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Embryo selection; automated; morphology; prognostic test; time-lapse

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26604069     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  15 in total

1.  Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Sarah Armstrong; Priya Bhide; Vanessa Jordan; Allan Pacey; Jane Marjoribanks; Cindy Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-29

2.  Euploid embryos selected by an automated time-lapse system have superior SET outcomes than selected solely by conventional morphology assessment.

Authors:  E Rocafort; M Enciso; A Leza; J Sarasa; J Aizpurua
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Fertility technologies and how to optimize laboratory performance to support the shortening of time to birth of a healthy singleton: a Delphi consensus.

Authors:  Giovanni Coticchio; Barry Behr; Alison Campbell; Marcos Meseguer; Dean E Morbeck; Valerio Pisaturo; Carlos E Plancha; Denny Sakkas; Yanwen Xu; Thomas D'Hooghe; Evelyn Cottell; Kersti Lundin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Sarah Armstrong; Priya Bhide; Vanessa Jordan; Allan Pacey; Cindy Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-25

5.  Development of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on Day 3.

Authors:  Bjørn Molt Petersen; Mikkel Boel; Markus Montag; David K Gardner
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 6.  Revealing the secret life of pre-implantation embryos by time-lapse monitoring: A review.

Authors:  Azita Faramarzi; Mohammad Ali Khalili; Giulietta Micara; Azam Agha-Rahimi
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2017-05

7.  Does time-lapse imaging have favorable results for embryo incubation and selection compared with conventional methods in clinical in vitro fertilization? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Minghao Chen; Shiyou Wei; Junyan Hu; Jing Yuan; Fenghua Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Transparent collaboration between industry and academia can serve unmet patient need and contribute to reproductive public health.

Authors:  Thomas D'Hooghe
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Comparative study of obstetric and neonatal outcomes of live births between poor- and good-quality embryo transfers.

Authors:  Kozue Akamine; Keiko Mekaru; Keiya Gibo; Chinatsu Nagata; Sugiko Oishi; Maho Miyagi; Chiaki Heshiki; Tadatugu Kinjo; Hitoshi Masamoto; Yoichi Aoki
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-21

10.  External validation of a time-lapse model; a retrospective study comparing embryo evaluation using a morphokinetic model to standard morphology with live birth as endpoint.

Authors:  Emma Adolfsson; Sandra Porath; Anna Nowosad Andershed
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2018-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.