| Literature DB >> 26603386 |
Shahryar Khattak1, Elise Brimble2, Wenbo Zhang3,4,5, Kirill Zaslavsky6,7, Emma Strong8, P Joel Ross9, Jason Hendry10, Seema Mital11, Michael W Salter12,13,14, Lucy R Osborne15,16,17, James Ellis18,19,20.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Williams-Beuren Syndrome (WBS) is caused by the microdeletion of approximately 25 genes on chromosome 7q11.23, and is characterized by a spectrum of cognitive and behavioural features.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26603386 PMCID: PMC4657290 DOI: 10.1186/s13041-015-0168-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Brain ISSN: 1756-6606 Impact factor: 4.041
Fig. 1Differentiated WBS-neurons represent all cortical layers of the brain and show normal neuronal morphology. Six week WBS A neuronal culture stained with dendritic marker (MAP2) alone (a) and together with neurofilament (NF-axonal marker) (b). c Fluidigm single cell qRT-PCR analysis to characterize the neurons and efficiency of the differentiation protocol. The depicted graph shows an average value of all WBS and WT neurons. d Distribution of generated neurons for various brain cortical layers based on marker gene expression profiles
Fig. 2WBS-neurons display prolonged decay of evoked action potentials and decreased voltage-gated K+ currents. a Spontaneous action potentials were identified in WT- (Left) and WBS- (Right) neurons. b Representative traces show membrane potentials responding to injection of current step in WT- (Left) and WBS- (Right) neurons. c-d Histograms represent average decay time and amplitude of evoked action potentials for all cell lines of WT- and WBS-neurons. “n” represents number of neurons recorded. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. e A plot showing average current–voltage relationships of voltage-gated Na+ and K+ currents between WT- and WBS-neurons. ***P < 0.001
Fig. 3Genes within the hemizygous WBS deletion show reduced expression in differentiated iPSC neurons. The primers used for validation are described in Additional file 5: Table S1. a A bar graph of the neuronally expressed genes at 7q11.23 show the log2 fold change expression of WBS- vs. WT-iPSC neurons, as determined through microarray analysis. Genes with no change in expression were below the array detection threshold (average signal ≥100). All expressed genes that were confirmed to be deleted through MLPA were found to be downregulated [11]. A log2 fold change of -1 corresponds with half the expression of the controls as indicated by the dashed line. b qRT-PCR of five neuronally expressed genes was used to verify the array results. Expression was normalized to HMBS, and an averaged fold change of each WBS neuronal line (n = 3) is presented relative to the WT control. All five genes were expressed at less than half the level of expression in WT iPSC-derived neurons. Data are shown as mean ± SEM
Fig. 4qRT-PCR Validation and gene set enrichment analysis. a Twenty-five differentially expressed genes were chosen for validation using qRT-PCR. Expression values from each WBS iPSC neuronal line (n = 3) were normalized to HMBS and TBP, and are presented as average fold change relative to WT control. All 25 genes showed altered expression in the same direction as identified on the array; the corresponding heatmap shows the log2 fold change in expression values from the array, with red indicating lower and blue indicating higher expression in WBS samples. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. b Log2 fold change of the top 15 downregulated genes in the voltage-gated potassium channel complex (GO:0008076) from the microarray. c Enrichment Plots of the two most highly enriched gene sets in the dataset. The top 10 genes in each gene set, ranked by absolute fold change, are shown in the corresponding tables (Additional file 6: Table S2, Additional file 7: Table S3, Additional file 8: Table S4 and Additional file 9: Table S5). d Enriched synaptic gene sets are highly interconnected. Enrichment Map [25] in Cytoscape was used to visualize overlap between enriched gene sets (FDR <0.1) as a network of interconnected nodes. The size of each node corresponds to the size of the gene set. The node color corresponds to the normalized enrichment score, with a darker green corresponding to stronger negative enrichment (lower expression in WBS relative to WT). The size of the edges between nodes corresponds to the number of genes the gene sets share in common. The largest interconnected network of nodes, which was comprised of gene sets governing synaptic function, is shown (46 out of a total 136 nodes). The full enrichment map is shown in Additional file 4: Figure S4