Literature DB >> 26601632

Changes in Bone Density in Metal-Backed and All-Polyethylene Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Chloe E H Scott1, Frazer A Wade2, Rajarshi Bhattacharya2, Deborah MacDonald2, Pankaj Pankaj3, Richard W Nutton2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proximal tibial strain in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) may alter bone mineral density and cause pain. The aims of this retrospective cohort study were to quantify and compare changes in proximal tibial bone mineral density in metal-backed and all-polyethylene medial UKAs, correlating these with outcome, particularly ongoing pain.
METHODS: Radiographs of 173 metal-backed and 82 all-polyethylene UKAs were analyzed using digital radiograph densitometry at 0, 1, 2, and 5 years. The mean grayscale of 4 proximal tibial regions was measured and converted to a ratio: the GSRb (grayscale ratio b), where GSRb>1 represents relative medial sclerosis.
RESULTS: In both implants, GSRb reduced significantly to 1 year and stabilized with no differences between implants. Subgroup analysis showed less improvement in Oxford Knee Score in patients whose GSRb increased by more than 10% at 1 year (40/255) compared with patients whose GSRb reduced by more than 10% at both 1 years (8.2 vs 15.8, P=.002) and 5 years (9.6 vs 15.8, P=.022). Patients with persistently painful UKAs (17/255) showed no reduction in GSRb at 1 year compared with a 20% reduction in those without pain (P=.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Bone mineral density changes under medial UKAs are independent of metal backing. Medial sclerosis appears to be associated with ongoing pain.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone mineral density; bone strain; digital radiodensitometry; unexplained pain; unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26601632     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  6 in total

1.  All-polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with increased risks of poorer knee society knee score and lower satisfaction in obese patients.

Authors:  Wayne Yong Xiang Foo; Ming Han Lincoln Liow; Jerry Yongqiang Chen; Darren Keng Jin Tay; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  [Progress of change in bone mineral density after knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Wenxing Wei; Yuangang Wu; Yi Zeng; Bin Shen
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-01-15

3.  Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Proximal tibial strain in an experimentally validated finite element model.

Authors:  C E H Scott; M J Eaton; R W Nutton; F A Wade; S L Evans; P Pankaj
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.853

4.  The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model.

Authors:  I Danese; P Pankaj; C E H Scott
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 5.853

5.  Biomechanical effects of fixed-bearing femoral prostheses with different coronal positions in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pengcheng Ma; Aikeremujiang Muheremu; Siping Zhang; Qian Zheng; Wei Wang; Kan Jiang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Ten-year survival and patient-reported outcomes of a medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty incorporating an all-polyethylene tibial component.

Authors:  Chloe E H Scott; Frazer A Wade; Deborah MacDonald; Richard W Nutton
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.067

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.