Literature DB >> 26600753

Highlight report: Interspecies extrapolation by physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling.

Agata Widera1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26600753      PMCID: PMC4650963          DOI: 10.17179/excli2015-548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EXCLI J        ISSN: 1611-2156            Impact factor:   4.068


× No keyword cloud information.

‭‭

Recently, several articles have been published questioning the usefulness of animal experiments for prediction of human toxicity (Leist and Hartung, 2013[14]). For example, it has been reported that there is almost no correlation of gene expression alterations induced by inflammatory stimuli in humans and mice (Seok et al., 2013[18]). However, a recent study of Thiel et al. (2015[22]) demonstrates that this view may be too pessimistic. Based on pharmacokinetic modeling, Thiel et al. (2015[22]) demonstrated a surprisingly precise mouse to human extrapolation for 10 exemplary pharmaceuticals. For interspecies modeling the authors adjusted four parameter domains in PBPK models: (i) Species-specific physiology, including more than 500 individual parameters, for example organ size and blood flow; (ii) the fraction of non-protein bound test compound; (iii) pharmacokinetic parameters, such as Km and Vmax for the predominant route of clearance, (iv) tissue specific gene expression of the most important genes responsible for elimination of the test compound (Thiel et al., 2015[22]). Adjusting these parameter domains leads to a very good fit of mouse to human extrapolated plasma concentrations of the test compounds compared to measured human plasma concentrations. One of the limitations of the study of Thiel et al. (2015[22]) is the use of gene expression data for simulation of the influence of metabolizing enzymes and carriers involved in clearance of the test compounds. Since the activities and not RNA levels are relevant in this context, the RNA based approximation can certainly be further improved. However, establishment of a tissue and species specific directory of all relevant metabolizing activities still represents an important future project. Currently, much effort is invested in research on in vitro systems (Frey et al., 2014[5]; Kim et al., 2015[12]; Hammad and Ahmed, 2014[10]), particularly in the fields of hepatotoxicity (Godoy et al., 2013[8]; Grinberg et al., 2014[9]; Ghallab, 2014[6]; Schug et al., 2013[17]), neurotoxicity (Balmer et al., 2014[1]; Waldmann et al., 2014[23]; Krug et al., 2013[13]; Stöber, 2014[20]) and nephrotoxicity (Giustarini et al., 2009[7]; Faiz et al., 2011[4]). These studies depend on knowledge of in vivo relevant concentrations which should be covered by in vitro testing. A precise extrapolation of doses in vivo to blood concentrations or even better compound concentrations at the target cells of toxicity is therefore critical for progress in the field of alternative methods and can best be achieved by systematic PBPK modeling (Mielke et al., 2011[15]; Sterner et al., 2013[19]; Strikwold et al., 2013[21]; Wang et al., 2000[24]). Further progress may be achieved by combining PBPK models with the recently established spatio-temporal models (Hoehme et al., 2010[11]; Drasdo et al., 2014[2]) which can simulate metabolism at the level of individual cells (Schliess et al., 2014[16]; Drasdo et al., 2014[3]; Widera, 2014[25]). The here discussed study of Thiel and colleagues improves the reliability of extrapolating compound concentrations from mice to human by the systematic adaptation of species specific model parameters and therefore is of high relevance not only for the planning of first-in-man studies but also for an improved use of in vitro systems for prediction of human toxicity.
  25 in total

1.  Prediction and validation of cell alignment along microvessels as order principle to restore tissue architecture in liver regeneration.

Authors:  Stefan Hoehme; Marc Brulport; Alexander Bauer; Essam Bedawy; Wiebke Schormann; Matthias Hermes; Verena Puppe; Rolf Gebhardt; Sebastian Zellmer; Michael Schwarz; Ernesto Bockamp; Tobias Timmel; Jan G Hengstler; Dirk Drasdo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A systematic evaluation of the use of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling for cross-species extrapolation.

Authors:  Christoph Thiel; Sebastian Schneckener; Markus Krauss; Ahmed Ghallab; Ute Hofmann; Tobias Kanacher; Sebastian Zellmer; Rolf Gebhardt; Jan G Hengstler; Lars Kuepfer
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.534

3.  Reconfigurable microfluidic hanging drop network for multi-tissue interaction and analysis.

Authors:  Olivier Frey; Patrick M Misun; David A Fluri; Jan G Hengstler; Andreas Hierlemann
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Integrated metabolic spatial-temporal model for the prediction of ammonia detoxification during liver damage and regeneration.

Authors:  Freimut Schliess; Stefan Hoehme; Sebastian G Henkel; Ahmed Ghallab; Dominik Driesch; Jan Böttger; Reinhard Guthke; Michael Pfaff; Jan G Hengstler; Rolf Gebhardt; Dieter Häussinger; Dirk Drasdo; Sebastian Zellmer
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  3D spherical microtissues and microfluidic technology for multi-tissue experiments and analysis.

Authors:  Jin-Young Kim; David A Fluri; Rosemarie Marchan; Kurt Boonen; Soumyaranjan Mohanty; Prateek Singh; Seddik Hammad; Bart Landuyt; Jan G Hengstler; Jens M Kelm; Andreas Hierlemann; Olivier Frey
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 3.307

6.  A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for the oxime TMB-4: simulation of rodent and human data.

Authors:  Teresa R Sterner; Christopher D Ruark; Tammie R Covington; Kyung O Yu; Jeffery M Gearhart
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2013-01-13       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases.

Authors:  Junhee Seok; H Shaw Warren; Alex G Cuenca; Michael N Mindrinos; Henry V Baker; Weihong Xu; Daniel R Richards; Grace P McDonald-Smith; Hong Gao; Laura Hennessy; Celeste C Finnerty; Cecilia M López; Shari Honari; Ernest E Moore; Joseph P Minei; Joseph Cuschieri; Paul E Bankey; Jeffrey L Johnson; Jason Sperry; Avery B Nathens; Timothy R Billiar; Michael A West; Marc G Jeschke; Matthew B Klein; Richard L Gamelli; Nicole S Gibran; Bernard H Brownstein; Carol Miller-Graziano; Steve E Calvano; Philip H Mason; J Perren Cobb; Laurence G Rahme; Stephen F Lowry; Ronald V Maier; Lyle L Moldawer; David N Herndon; Ronald W Davis; Wenzhong Xiao; Ronald G Tompkins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Human embryonic stem cell-derived test systems for developmental neurotoxicity: a transcriptomics approach.

Authors:  Anne K Krug; Raivo Kolde; John A Gaspar; Eugen Rempel; Nina V Balmer; Kesavan Meganathan; Kinga Vojnits; Mathurin Baquié; Tanja Waldmann; Roberto Ensenat-Waser; Smita Jagtap; Richard M Evans; Stephanie Julien; Hedi Peterson; Dimitra Zagoura; Suzanne Kadereit; Daniel Gerhard; Isaia Sotiriadou; Michael Heke; Karthick Natarajan; Margit Henry; Johannes Winkler; Rosemarie Marchan; Luc Stoppini; Sieto Bosgra; Joost Westerhout; Miriam Verwei; Jaak Vilo; Andreas Kortenkamp; Jürgen Hescheler; Ludwig Hothorn; Susanne Bremer; Christoph van Thriel; Karl-Heinz Krause; Jan G Hengstler; Jörg Rahnenführer; Marcel Leist; Agapios Sachinidis
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.153

9.  Transcriptome based differentiation of harmless, teratogenetic and cytotoxic concentration ranges of valproic acid.

Authors:  Regina Stöber
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 4.068

10.  Biomarker: the universe of chemically induced gene expression alterations in human hepatocyte.

Authors:  Seddik Hammad; Hassan Ahmed
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.068

View more
  1 in total

1.  Possibilities and limitations of intravital imaging.

Authors:  Reham Hassan
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 4.068

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.