| Literature DB >> 26600736 |
Akihiko Ohwatashi1, Satoshi Ikeda2, Katsuhiro Harada2, Yurie Kamikawa2, Akira Yoshida2.
Abstract
Exercise has been considered to affect the functional recovery from central nervous damage. Neurotrophic factors have various effects on brain damage. However, the effects of exercise for expression of GDNF on functional recovery with brain damage are not well known. We investigated the difference in functional recovery between non-exercise and beam-walking exercise groups, and the expression of GDNF in both groups after photochemical infarction. Adult male Wistar rats (N = 64) were used. Animals were divided into two groups: non-exercise (N = 35), and beam-walking exercise (N = 29). All rats underwent surgical photochemical infarction. The rats of the beam-walking group were trained every day to walk on a narrow beam after a one-day recovery period and those of the non-exercise group were left to follow a natural course. Animals were evaluated for hind limb function every day using a beam-walking task with an elevated narrow beam. The number of GDNF-like immunoreactive cells in the temporal cortex surrounding the lesion was counted 1, 3, 5, and 7 days after the infarction. Functional recovery of the beam-walking exercise group was significantly earlier than that of the non-exercise group. At 3 days after infarction, the number of GDNF-positive cells in the temporal cortex surrounding the infarction was significantly increased in the beam-walking exercise group compared with that in the non-exercise group. In the exercise group, motor function was remarkably recovered with the increased expression of GDNF-like immunoreactive cells. Our results suggested that a rehabilitative approach increased the expression of GDNF and facilitated functional recovery from cerebral infarction.Entities:
Keywords: beam-walking exercise; cerebral infarction; cortical plasticity; functional recovery; glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor; photochemical infarction
Year: 2013 PMID: 26600736 PMCID: PMC4653718
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EXCLI J ISSN: 1611-2156 Impact factor: 4.068
Figure 1Mean days on which a score of “7” was achieved in non-exercise and beam-walking groups (A).
*Level of significance: P < 0.01. Mean rating of beam-walking scores of rats after photochemical infarction (B), triangle is non-exercise group; square is beam-walking exercise group. Values are means ± SE.
Figure 2Representative photographs of GDNF-positive cells.
A-C represents the temporal cortex surrounding the infarction of the non-exercise group at 3 days (A), 5 days (B), and 7 days (C) after photochemical infarction. D-F represents the temporal cortex surrounding the infarction of the beam-walking group at 3 days (D), 5 days (E), and 7 days (F) after photochemical infarction. The scale bars are 500 μm.
Figure 3GDNF protein expression after photochemical infarction. Open bars represent the non-exercise group, solid bars represent the beam-walking group.
Values are means ± SE. *Level of significance: P < 0.05