Literature DB >> 26600680

Genotypic variability in physiological, biomass and yield response to drought stress in pigeonpea.

M Vanaja1, M Maheswari1, P Sathish1, P Vagheera1, N Jyothi Lakshmi1, G Vijay Kumar1, S K Yadav1, Abdul Razzaq1, Jainender Singh1, B Sarkar1.   

Abstract

Three pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.) genotypes- GT-1, AKP-1 and PRG-158 with varying crop duration, growth habit and flowering pattern were evaluated for variability in their response for drought stress. Drought stress was imposed at initiation of flowering and the observations on biomass and seed yield parameters were recorded at harvest. The magnitude of response of individual component to drought stress was found to be genotype specific. Drought stress significantly decreased photosynthetic rate (PN), transpiration rate (Tr) and relative water content (RWC) in all the genotypes, however the magnitude of reduction differed with genotype. With drought stress, the reduction of PN was highest in GT-1 while reduction in Tr was highest in PRG-158. The genotype AKP-1, accumulated significantly higher concentrations of osmotic solutes especially proline under water deficit stress, this facilitated it to maintain higher relative water content (RWC) and lower malondialdehyde (MDA) content as compared to other genotypes. Drought stress also impacted biomass production and their partitioning to vegetative and reproductive components at harvest. There was significant variability between the genotypes for seed yield under drought stress while it was non-significant under well-watered condition. Drought stress enhanced flower drop and decreased flower to pod conversion resulting in reduced pod number and seed number in PRG-158 and GT-1. The genotype AKP-1 recorded superior performance for seed yield under stress environment due to its ability in maintaining pod and seed number as well as improved test weight (100 seed weight). Under drought stress, significant positive association of seed yield with proline, seed number, pod number and test weight clearly indicating their role in drought tolerance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomass partitioning; Cajanus cajan; Drought stress; Proline; WUE

Year:  2015        PMID: 26600680      PMCID: PMC4646872          DOI: 10.1007/s12298-015-0324-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants        ISSN: 0974-0430


  10 in total

1.  Osmolyte accumulation: can it really help increase crop yield under drought conditions?

Authors:  R. Serraj; T. R. Sinclair
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.228

2.  PLANT CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR RESPONSES TO HIGH SALINITY.

Authors:  Paul M. Hasegawa; Ray A. Bressan; Jian-Kang Zhu; Hans J. Bohnert
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06

3.  Photosynthesis during desiccation in an intertidal alga and a land plant.

Authors:  Y Kawamitsu; T Driscoll; J S Boyer
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.927

4.  Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts. I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation.

Authors:  R L Heath; L Packer
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 4.013

5.  Quantitative expression analysis of drought responsive genes in clones of Hevea with varying levels of drought tolerance.

Authors:  Lisha P Luke; M B Mohamed Sathik; Molly Thomas; Linu Kuruvilla; K V Sumesh; K Annamalainathan
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2015-03-15

6.  Independent variation in photosynthetic capacity and stomatal conductance leads to differences in intrinsic water use efficiency in 11 soybean genotypes before and during mild drought.

Authors:  Matthew E Gilbert; Maciej A Zwieniecki; N Michele Holbrook
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 6.992

7.  Identification of a drought tolerant introgression line derived from Dongxiang common wild rice (O. rufipogon Griff.).

Authors:  Xia Zhang; Shaoxia Zhou; Yongcai Fu; Zhen Su; Xiangkun Wang; Chuanqing Sun
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 4.076

8.  Expression of pigeonpea hybrid-proline-rich protein encoding gene (CcHyPRP) in yeast and Arabidopsis affords multiple abiotic stress tolerance.

Authors:  Bhyri Priyanka; Kambakam Sekhar; Vudem Dashavantha Reddy; Khareedu Venkateswara Rao
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.803

9.  Sap Pressure in Vascular Plants: Negative hydrostatic pressure can be measured in plants.

Authors:  P F Scholander; E D Bradstreet; E A Hemmingsen; H T Hammel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-04-16       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Overexpression of pigeonpea stress-induced cold and drought regulatory gene (CcCDR) confers drought, salt, and cold tolerance in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Srinath Tamirisa; Dashavantha Reddy Vudem; Venkateswara Rao Khareedu
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 6.992

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Response of Cajanus cajan to excess copper in the soil: tolerance and biomass production.

Authors:  Mariana Bocchi da Silva; Nayane Cristina Pires Bomfim; Victor Navarro da Silva; Caroline de Lima Frachia; Lucas Anjos de Souza; Gilberto Costa Justino; Liliane Santos de Camargos
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2022-07-08

Review 2.  The Adaptation and Tolerance of Major Cereals and Legumes to Important Abiotic Stresses.

Authors:  Jagadish Rane; Ajay Kumar Singh; Mahesh Kumar; Karnar M Boraiah; Kamlesh K Meena; Aliza Pradhan; P V Vara Prasad
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 5.923

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.