Swetha Raman1, Meetali Singh2, Utpal Tatu2, Kaza Suguna1. 1. Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India. 2. Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Abstract
The involvement of Hsp90 in progression of diseases like cancer, neurological disorders and several pathogen related conditions is well established. Hsp90, therefore, has emerged as an attractive drug target for many of these diseases. Several small molecule inhibitors of Hsp90, such as geldanamycin derivatives, that display antitumor activity, have been developed and are under clinical trials. However, none of these tested inhibitors or drugs are peptide-based compounds. Here we report the first crystal structure of a peptide bound at the ATP binding site of the N-terminal domain of Hsp90. The peptide makes several specific interactions with the binding site residues, which are comparable to those made by the nucleotide and geldanamycin. A modified peptide was designed based on these interactions. Inhibition of ATPase activity of Hsp90 was observed in the presence of the modified peptide. This study provides an alternative approach and a lead peptide molecule for the rational design of effective inhibitors of Hsp90 function.
The involvement of Hsp90 in progression of diseases like cancer, neurological disorders and several pathogen related conditions is well established. Hsp90, therefore, has emerged as an attractive drug target for many of these diseases. Several small molecule inhibitors of Hsp90, such as geldanamycin derivatives, that display antitumor activity, have been developed and are under clinical trials. However, none of these tested inhibitors or drugs are peptide-based compounds. Here we report the first crystal structure of a peptide bound at the ATP binding site of the N-terminal domain of Hsp90. The peptide makes several specific interactions with the binding site residues, which are comparable to those made by the nucleotide and geldanamycin. A modified peptide was designed based on these interactions. Inhibition of ATPase activity of Hsp90 was observed in the presence of the modified peptide. This study provides an alternative approach and a lead peptide molecule for the rational design of effective inhibitors of Hsp90 function.
Hsp90 is a ubiquitous molecular chaperone, which plays a crucial role in maturation and
activation of a wide array of client proteins under normal and stress-related
conditions. Many of its well established clientele such as signalling kinases,
transcription factors, steroid hormone receptors etc., play central roles in an array of
cellular processes like cell signalling, cell survival, proliferation and apoptosis.
Many of these proteins are oncogenic and necessary for tumorigenesis1.
Many of the client proteins have also been relevant in the onset of neurodegenerative
disorders and viral infections2. Blocking the function of Hsp90 causes
proteosomal degradation of the oncogenic client proteins, leading to the control of the
growth of cancer cells. Several Hsp90 inhibitors have been shown to exhibit antitumor,
anti-parasitic and antiviral activity, thereby making Hsp90 an effective drug target for
cancer and many other infections345678.Hsp90 consists of three distinct functional domains: the N-terminal ATP binding domain
(NTD), the middle domain and the C-terminal dimerization domain. The first crystal
structure of the NTD was determined for humanHsp90 in complex with the antitumor drug
geldanamycin9. Based on this structure, it was initially predicted
that geldanamycin competitively inhibits binding of unfolded proteins to this domain.
However, the true function of NTD came into light when the structure of NTD from yeastHsp90 in complex with ATP/ADP was determined10, and limited sequence
homology between Hsp90 and other ATP dependent enzymes like type II topoisomerases and
the MutL mismatch repair proteins was recognized11. This led to the
identification of key residues involved in ATP binding, implicating the action of
geldanamycin as a competitive inhibitor of ATP binding. Due to the characteristic fold
of the NTD, Hsp90 is classified under GHKL family of ATPases12, which
includes DNA gyrase, histidine kinase and MutL, among others. Inhibition of ATP binding
and hydrolysis by natural product inhibitors like geldanamycin and radicicol have
demonstrated the dependence of Hsp90 function on ATPase activity1314.
This makes the NTD a potential target domain for designing various Hsp90 inhibitors and
drug molecules which currently include geldanamycin and radicicol derivatives, and
purine based inhibitors. In spite of the development of drugs such as 17-AAG,
NVP-AUY922, IPI504 and STA-9090, which are in clinical trials1516, it
is still a challenge to find more effective Hsp90 inhibitors that are more soluble and
less toxic, as well as to explore new avenues to approach this problem. Hsp90 of
Dictyostelium discoideum (HspD) with 64% sequence identity with the human
enzyme serves as a good model system to study the structural and functional aspects of
Hsp90. We had earlier reported the activity studies of the full length protein and the
crystal structure of the N-terminal domain of HspD (HspD-NTD) in the native form, at a
resolution of 2.7 Å17 (PDB code: 4XKK). We have
also determined the crystal structure of HspD-NTD in the presence of ATP, AMPPCP,
AMPPNP, ATP-γS and geldanamycin. While attempting to obtain the structure of
the native NTD at a higher resolution, we observed a heptapeptide fragment occupying the
ATP binding pocket of this domain and making specific interactions with the binding site
residues. We modified the sequence of this peptide and designed a new hexapeptide for
better interaction with HspD-NTD. ATPase activity of Hsp90 was evaluated in the presence
of this modified peptide. This is the first reported structure of a peptide bound to the
NTD of Hsp90 and here we present this structure, which provides a basis for the
development of peptide-based inhibitors of Hsp90.
Results
Crystal structures of HspD-NTD in the native form and in complex with different
ligands have been determined. As all the structures were refined using data that
extend to 1.8 Å resolution or better, a reliable comparison
of ligand-protein interactions could be carried out. We also observe a peptide bound
to the nucleotide binding pocket of HspD-NTD. The structure of this complex will be
discussed in detail and compared to the structures of NTD in complex with other
ligands.
Structure of NTD in complex with peptide
The structure of HspD-NTD is similar to the other reported structures of
equivalent domain from homologous Hsp90s consisting of a typical Bergerat
fold11 of two layer α/β sandwich
motif and a central cavity forming the nucleotide binding site with the
hydrophobic face of the β-sheet as the base and the helices as
walls. During the initial stages of model building and refinement of the native
HspD-NTD structure, a long continuous density was observed in the ATP binding
pocket. A tyrosine residue could be clearly identified from the density. It was
possible to build residues on either side of the tyrosine and extend it to a
short peptide (Fig. 1a). This was an unexpected result as
no peptide was added to the protein. Careful examination of the density and the
sequence of the HspD-NTD clone revealed a heptapeptide,
Gly-Arg-Asp-Leu-Tyr-Asp-Asp, which was present in the pRSET A vector sequence
between the N-terminal hexahistidine tag and the NTD protein sequence, used for
the expression (Fig. 1b). The structure refined well on
addition of the peptide. The first 214 of a total of 225 residues of HspD-NTD
and the bound peptide were clearly visible in the electron density. The peptide
appeared to be cleaved and released from the fusion protein as the distance
between the N-terminus of the protein and the C-terminus of the peptide is
40 Å and no electron density appeared on either side of
the peptide.
Figure 1
Structure of HspD-NTD in complex with a heptapeptide, GRDLYDD.
(a) Stereo image of the peptide bound at the nucleotide binding site
of HspD-NTD. The 2Fo-Fc map for the peptide was
contoured at 1.5 σ. (b) Sequence of HspD-NTD construct
used for expression. Secondary structural elements as observed in the
crystal structure are marked. The heptapeptide sequence bound at the ATP
binding site is circled.
From the structure of NTD of humanHsp90 reported in complex with geldanamycin,
it was initially speculated that geldanamycin inhibits Hsp90 by competing with
the binding of the substrate protein to NTD due to general similarities between
the geldanamycin ansa ring and a peptide9. It was hypothesized
that a five amino acid polypeptide in a bent conformation can trace the
geldanamycin ansa ring backbone with its side chains corresponding to the
different groups of the ansa ring. A peptide model was also proposed, consisting
of a Tryptophan residue whose position corresponds to the carbamate group of
geldanamycin and can interact with the Asp93 residue of the NTD of humanHsp90.
There are reports of development of peptidomimetic inhibitors like Shepherdin
and its derivatives against Hsp9018, where Shepherdin was
predicted to dock into ATP binding site. In another study, sansalvamide, a
cyclic depsipeptide, and its derivatives were shown to inhibit Hsp90
activity1920. However, this natural product was shown to
bind to a different location on Hsp9019. The molecular basis for
a peptide interacting with the NTD of Hsp90 is not known as no crystal structure
with a bound peptide was available until now.
Peptide-NTD interactions
The peptide Gly-Arg-Asp-Leu-Tyr-Asp-Asp (numbered from −14 to
−8 starting from Gly) occupying the positions of ATP/geldanamycin
was found to make direct and many solvent mediated interactions with the protein
(Fig. 2). The Tyr-10 residue is buried in the pocket
and interacts with the residues involved in interacting with the base of the
nucleotide. The side chain hydroxyl group of Tyr-10 of the peptide makes a
direct hydrogen bond with the side chain of Thr174 and water mediated
interactions with the side chains of Asp82, Thr174 and the backbone N atom of
Gly86. The backbone O atom of Tyr-10 forms a hydrogen bond with the side chain
of Lys47 and the N atom makes a water mediated interaction with the side chain
of Asp43. The side chain of Asp-12 makes water mediated interactions with the O
atom of Gly125 and the side chain of Arg101. The N atom of Leu-11 makes water
mediated hydrogen bonds with the side chains of Asn40 and Asp43. The O atom of
Leu-11 makes water mediated hydrogen bonds with the side chains of Asn95 and
Arg101. The side chain of Asp-9 interacts with the side chain of Asp43 through a
water molecule, while its O atom makes a water mediated hydrogen bond with the
side chain of Asn95. The peptide makes two salt bridge interactions with the
protein between Asp-8∙∙∙Lys47 and
Arg-13∙∙∙Glu36. These two salt bridges
impart additional strength to the interactions between the peptide and the
protein.
Figure 2
Peptide-protein interactions.
Interactions of peptide GRDLYDD (pink) with residues of HspD-NTD lining the
pocket (yellow) and bound solvent molecules (cyan spheres). Hydrogen bonds
are shown as black lines. The peptide makes hydrogen bonds (with T147, K47),
several water-mediated interactions and forms two salt-bridges
(R-13∙∙∙E36 and
D-8∙∙∙K47) with the protein.
The peptide has a basic amino acid (Arginine) on one side, an acidic one
(Aspartate) on the other and hydrophobic residues in the middle. The hydrophobic
Tyrosine and Leucine residues of the peptide are buried in the pocket, while the
flanking charged residues interact with residues of complementary charge at the
edges of the pocket (Fig. 3a). The peptide occupies
similar position as the nucleotide or geldanamycin in the pocket (Fig. 3b,c) and is observed to be more extended, and forms more
solvent mediated interactions.
Figure 3
Interacting nature and conformation of the peptide.
(a) Electrostatic surface representation of HspD-NTD with bound
peptide, indicating the nature of the complementary interaction of the
anchoring residues R-13 and D-8, of the peptide with the protein. Residues
of HspD-NTD, E36 and K47, that are involved in these interactions are also
shown. Overlay of peptide (pink) on (b) AMPPCP (blue) and (c)
Geldanamycin (green). (d) Internal interactions stabilizing the
peptide conformation.
In addition to making various contacts with the protein, the peptide is also
internally stabilized by forming hydrogen bonds between its residues. The
peptide has an internal Type I β-turn with the formation of
Asp-12∙∙∙Asp-9 hydrogen bond. The O atom of
Asp-12 also forms a water mediated hydrogen bond with the O atom of Leu-11
(Fig. 3d).
Comparison of the structures of HspD-NTD in complex with peptide,
nucleotide and geldanamycin
We compared the peptide-bound structure of HspD-NTD with the structures of other
complexes that we determined. While the γ-phosphate in ATP, AMPPNP
and ATPγS were disordered, it appeared only in AMPPCP. We compared
the interactions made by the peptide with those made by AMPPCP and geldanamycin
(Fig. 4 and listed in Supplementary Table S1). We observed that
water molecules replace the phosphate groups in case of the peptide complex,
which allows the peptide to extend its interaction with the protein through
waters. Asp82, which is an essential residue for recognition and binding of the
nucleotide1321, interacts with all the three ligands. It
forms direct as well as solvent mediated interactions with the base of the
nucleotide and carbamate group of geldanamycin. In case of the peptide, it forms
a water-mediated interaction with the side chain of Tyr-10 residue. Replacing
this residue with a tryptophan is likely to make the interactions stronger as
the indole group could mimic the adenine base and can interact directly with
Asp82. The residues of the ATP lid segment (Gly97-Phe128), with its glycine rich
loop that positions γ-phosphate for hydrolysis, also makes several
interactions with all the three ligands. Lys47 makes two direct hydrogen bonds
with geldanamycin, but does not show any interaction with AMPPCP. However, it
forms a salt-bridge and a hydrogen bond with the peptide. On the other side of
the peptide, Arg-13 makes a salt bridge with Glu36 residue, which is implicated
in catalysis13 and makes solvent mediated interactions with the
phosphate groups of the nucleotide, but shows no interaction with geldanamycin.
The two residues Arg-13 and Asp-8 of the peptide, through salt bridges, anchor
the peptide to the surface of Hsp90.
Figure 4
Interaction of different ligands with HspD-NTD.
(a) Interaction of AMPPCP (blue) with the protein (yellow). The green
sphere represents Mg2+ and water molecules are shown as cyan
spheres. Hydrogen bonds are shown as black lines and metal coordination as
red dashed lines. (b) Interaction of geldanamycin (green) with the
protein.
Inhibition of ATPase activity of HspD by a peptide
The crystal structure of HspD-NTD shows binding of the peptide
Gly-Arg-Asp-Leu-Tyr-Asp-Asp to the ATP binding pocket. The contacts made by the
peptide and Hsp90 are similar to those made by Hsp90 with ATP or its competitive
inhibitor geldanamycin with additional stabilizing salt bridges. Binding of the
peptide to the NTD should block the binding of ATP to the pocket, thereby
causing a decrease in the ATPase activity. Therefore, ATPase activity of HspD
was checked in the presence of
100 μM-13.5 mM concentration range of the
peptide. However, no significant change in the ATPase activity was observed in
the presence of the peptide. Based on the interactions observed in the crystal
structure, the peptide was modified with a view to enhance the interactions of
the peptide with the protein. The N-terminal Glycine was deleted, as it did not
form any specific interactions with the protein. The Tyrosine residue was
replaced by a Tryptophan, in order to mimic the interactions made by the base of
the nucleotide. Asp-12, which forms a water mediated interaction with Arg101,
was replaced by a Glutamate residue with the possibility of it forming a direct
hydrogen bond with the protein. The effect of the resulting hexapeptide
Arg-Glu-Leu-Trp-Asp-Asp, on the ATPase activity of HspD was examined.ATPase assay for HspD was carried out in presence of varying concentrations of
the peptide and fixed ATP concentration of 500 μM. In
presence of the peptide, there is a significant dose dependent inhibition of
ATPase activity of HspD, starting from 5 mM concentration of the
peptide (Fig. 5a). At a concentration of 10 mM
peptide, 30% inhibition of ATPase activity was observed, and upon further
increase of the concentration to 13.5 mM, 60% inhibition in activity
was observed, thus suggesting that, in principle, this peptide can bind to Hsp90
at its ATP binding pocket and inhibit the ATPase activity of Hsp90.
Figure 5
Inhibition of HspD ATPase activity with peptide RELWDD.
(a) Percent inhibition of ATPase activity of HspD
(2 μM) with increasing molar concentration of the
peptide RELWDD (n = 5). At the highest concentration
of 13.5 mM of the peptide, only
38.50 ± 10.11% activity is observed.
Data set was evaluated by ANOVA with p
value < 0.0001. (b) ATPase inhibition
of new construct of HspD by peptide RELWDD (n = 2).
At highest concentration of 13.5 mM of the peptide,
50.60 ± 4.68% ATPase activity is
observed. Data set was evaluated by ANOVA with p
value = 0.002. Bars indicate the
mean ± SEM. Individual series were
evaluated using two-tailed t-test.
The modified peptide showed weak ATPase inhibition, whereas the peptide bound to
HspD-NTD in the crystal structure showed no inhibition whatsoever. To check
whether the low inhibition is the consequence of the peptide already present in
the binding pocket, as it is part of the fusion protein, we cloned the full
length protein in pET-28a vector which does not have this peptide sequence in
the construct. However, the inhibition results did not change (Fig. 5b) indicating that either the observed inhibitory values are
intrinsic to the peptides or the binding pocket is empty in both the constructs
in solution. Bio-Layer Interferometry experiments were carried out to check the
binding of the peptide RELWDD. Weak binding of the peptide to HspD-NTD, which
was also cloned in pET-28a vector, was observed with a KD in the
lower micromolar range (see Supplementary
Fig. S1). In addition, progressive decrease in the binding of the
protein to the peptide was observed in the presence of increasing concentrations
of ATP (see Supplementary Fig. S2),
indicating that ATP competes with the peptide to bind to HspD-NTD. The peptide
can be further modified to improve the binding efficacy, thereby reducing the
inhibitory concentration required to inhibit Hsp90 function.
Implications on human Hsp90
A comparison of HspD-NTD with that of the human homologue (PDB code: 3T10)22 shows that the residues interacting with the peptide are
conserved in the two proteins, except that Arg101 in HspD, is replaced by Lys112
in the humanHsp90 (Fig. 6a). Lys47 of HspD-NTD is
observed to be in a different rotamer conformation as compared to Lys58 of the
human isoform, due to the former’s interaction with the residues of
the peptide. Lys58 of the humanHsp90 is likely to adopt a similar conformation
in the presence of a similar peptide. The water molecules interacting with Asn40
and Asp82 in the case of HspD-NTD are also found to be conserved in humanHsp90-NTD structure. Hence, it can be suggested that the peptide is also capable
of binding to the NTD of humanHsp90 in a manner observed in the HspD-NTD
structure. In order to validate this, ATPase assay was performed for humanHsp90
in the presence of the modified peptide. The hydrolysis of ATP was observed to
decline in the presence of increasing concentrations of the modified peptide. At
5 mM concentration of the peptide, Arg-Glu-Leu-Trp-Asp-Asp, 30%
inhibition of ATPase activity was observed, and the activity was inhibited up to
55% at 10 mM peptide concentration (Fig. 6b).
The human homologue was found to be more prone to inhibition by the peptide, as
it showed a larger decrease in its activity, at a lower concentration of the
peptide, as compared to HspD. This observation that the peptide binds to the NTD
and inhibits its ATPase activity paves way for the development of new class of
peptide-based inhibitors for Hsp90.
Figure 6
Interaction of peptide with human Hsp90. (a) Comparison of residues
interacting with the peptide (pink) in HspD-NTD (yellow) and NTD of human
Hsp90 (grey). (b) Inhibition of ATPase activity of human Hsp90 in the
presence of peptide RELWDD. The plot shows inhibition of human Hsp90
(2 μM) by increasing molar concentration of peptide
RELWDD (n = 2). At 10 mM peptide
concentration only 46.91 ± 12.05%
activity is remaining. Data set was evaluated by ANOVA with p
value = 0.032. Bars indicate the
mean ± SEM. Individual series were
evaluated using two-tailed t-test.
Discussion
In this study, the structure of the NTD of Hsp90 from D. discoideum was
analyzed in the native form and in complex with several ligands. We crystallized
HspD-NTD in complex with ADP, AMPPCP, AMPPNP, ATPγS and geldanamycin.
The protein-ligand interactions were found to be similar to the ones reported in the
structures of NTD from various organisms. We have observed for the first time a
heptapeptide bound at the nucleotide binding site of NTD, occupying the binding
pocket as the other ligands and making specific interactions with the protein. A
thorough analysis of the protein-peptide interactions and the solvent molecules in
the binding pocket was carried out and compared with the interactions of other
ligands with the NTD. Most of the residues involved in interaction with the peptide
and the other ligands were common and they interact either directly or through water
molecules. In addition, the two residues at the N- and the C-terminal ends of the
peptide make strong electrostatic interactions with residues on the surface of the
protein. The peptide comes from the vector used to express the protein. As the
peptide failed to inhibit the ATPase activity of HspD, we designed a new
hexapeptide, based on the interactions observed in the structure, by modifying the
sequence of the bound peptide. A tyrosine was changed to tryptophan to mimic the
natural substrate ATP. This and another change from an Asp residue to a Glu residue
were incorporated anticipating that two water mediated interactions of the residues,
Tyr and Asp with the protein will become direct interactions thus increasing the
binding strength of the peptide. This modified peptide RELWDD was found to inhibit
the ATPase activity of HspD and the humanHsp90, confirming its binding at the ATP
binding site. More potent inhibitors could be designed and tested with this peptide
as the lead compound.Natural products such as geldanamycin and radicicol have played a key role in
unravelling the biological function of Hsp90 and in identifying it as a molecular
target for cancer drugs2324. These compounds act as competitive
inhibitors, docking into the ATP-binding site in the NTD of Hsp9025.
These natural product inhibitors have been proved to be too toxic and unsuitable for
clinical trials due to high reactivity and low stability. Several different
derivatives of geldanamycin and radicicol have been developed, which show better
solubility and less toxicity152627. Other inhibitors such as
BIIB021 and PU-H71 are based on the purine scaffold of the natural nucleotide
ligands282930. Peptidomimetic compounds like Shepherdin
exhibit anti-leukaemic activity and are predicted to interact with NTD18. The crystal structure of the peptide bound to the NTD of Hsp90 and
the inhibition of ATPase activity of Hsp90 from D. discoideum and its human
homologue, by the modified peptide presented here, provide a structural platform for
the development of peptide-based inhibitors to this protein. There is a potential to
design peptides with better binding affinities based on the NTD-peptide interactions
observed in the structure presented here.
Methods
Cloning and protein purification
The genes for HspD and HspD-NTD were cloned into pRSET A vector, using the
following primers: 5′ CTCCGCCTGGGATCCAAAATGGCTGAATCACAAGTTG
3′ as forward primer and 5′
CTCATTCTCGAGCTAGTCGACTTTTTCCATT 3′ as reverse primer for
HspD as described previously17, and 5′
CTCCGCCTGGGATCCAAAATGGCTGAATCACAAGTTG 3′ as forward
primer and 5′CTCATTCTCGAGCTATTTGGCAGTGGTTTC 3′
as reverse primer for HspD-NTD, containing BamHI and XhoI sites (underlined) in
forward and reverse primers, respectively. The proteins, HspD and HspD-NTD, were
expressed as hexa histidine tagged fusion proteins in E. coli Rosetta
strain. The cells were grown in Terrific broth and induced with 1 mM
isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside at
15 °C for 15 hours. The proteins were
purified by nickel-NTA affinity chromatography. The column was washed with
imidazole gradient ranging from 5 mM to 30 mM in
50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, buffer. The proteins
were finally eluted with 300 mM imidazole, followed by gel
filtration with Sephacryl S-200 HR column and stored in
25 mM Tris and 200 mM NaCl, pH 7.5 buffer. The clone for
humanHsp90 in pRSET A vector was expressed in E. coli Rosetta strain,
and the protein was purified to homogeneity by nickel-NTA affinity
chromatography, as described previously31 and dialysed to
exchange buffer containing 40 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 100 mM
KCl and 5 mM MgCl2 for the ATPase assay. For the new
construct the gene for HspD and HspD-NTD were cloned in pET-28a vector, which
lacks the bound peptide sequence. The proteins were expressed and purified using
the same protocol as described above.
Peptides
The two peptides, GRDLYDD and RELWDD purchased from Custom peptide synthesis, USV
Limited, Mumbai, were synthesized by Fmoc chemistry on solid support and
purified using RP-HPLC.
Crystallization and data collection
The crystallization of the NTD construct was carried out using the hanging drop
method with 2 μl of the protein and
2 μl of the precipitant solution. The concentration of
protein used for crystallization trials was 15 mg/mL. Crystals
appeared in two weeks in a condition similar to the previously crystallized
native form of HspD-NTD17, consisting of 0.1 M HEPES
pH 7.0–8.0 and 10-30% PEG3350. The crystals diffracted to a
resolution of 1.2 Å at BM14 beamline of ESRF.Two data sets were collected: (i) a high resolution data with an exposure time of
4 seconds, 0.5° oscillation and a crystal-to-detector
distance of 102 mm, and (ii) a low resolution data with an exposure
time of 1 second, 1° oscillation and a
crystal-to-detector distance of 190 mm. The data sets were scaled
using SCALA of CCP4 suite32.
Structure solution and refinement
The crystal belonged to space group P21. The structure of the complex
was determined by molecular replacement using PHASER33 with
HspD-NTD (PDB code: 4XCJ) as search model (Z score of 32 and LLG of 1449).
During the initial stages of model building, a long extra density was observed
in the binding pocket. Automated model building in ARP/wARP34 and
Phenix.autobuild35 fitted a short Alanine polypeptide
in the extra density. Subsequent model building and solvent additions were
performed by manual inspection using Coot36 and the structure was
refined using the program REFMAC537. The structure refined well
upon the addition of the peptide with side chains to an Rwork 21.0%
and Rfree of 23.0%. After the addition of solvent molecules and
several cycles of refinement, the refinement converged to an Rwork
and Rfree of 18.5% and 21.0%, respectively. The data collection and
refinement details are given in Table 1. The figures
were made using the program PyMol (DeLano Scientific LLC.) and UCSF Chimera38.
Table 1
Data collection and refinement statistics.
Data Collection
Space Group
P21
Cell Parameters
a (Å)
41.91
b (Å)
46.63
c (Å)
59.76
β (˚)
107.12
Wavelength (Å)
0.8865
Resolution Range
(Å)
57.14–1.20
(1.26–1.20)
Rmerge (%)
9.9 (40.4)
Average I/σ(I)
9.6 (3.1)
Completeness (%)
96.3 (94.3)
Multiplicity
5.6 (4.1)
Refinement Statistics
No. of reflections used
Total
66263
Working set
62904
Test set
3359
Rwork (%)
18.5
Rfree (%)
21.0
No. of atoms
Protein atoms
1836
Solvent atoms
279
Average B-factor (Å2)
17.0
RMS deviation from ideal values
Bond length (Å)
0.008
Bond angle (˚)
1.22
Residues in Ramachandran plot (%)
Most favoured
98
Additionally allowed region
2
Values in parentheses correspond to
the last resolution shell
ATPase activity
In order to check the effect of the peptide binding on the ATPase activity of
HspD and humanHsp90, purified proteins (2 μM) were
incubated with varying peptide concentrations in 40 mM
Tris–Cl buffer, pH 7.4, containing 100 mM KCl and
5 mM MgCl2, at room temperature for half hour. ATPase
reaction was carried out in the presence of fixed ATP concentration of
500 μM at 37 °C for one hour.
γ-32P-ATP with a specific activity of
0.55 Ci/mmol was used as a tracer. ATP hydrolysis was monitored on a
PEI- cellulose TLC plate. Fractional cleavage of ATP was calculated for each
peptide concentration. ATPase activity of Hsp90 alone was considered 100%, and
percent change in ATPase activity was plotted against peptide concentration.
Binding studies using Bio-Layer Interferometry
The binding of the peptide RELWDD to HspD-NTD construct lacking the linker
peptide was measured by Bio-Layer Interferometry using an Octet RED96 instrument
(ForteBio, Inc.). The peptide was immobilized onto Amine Reactive
Second-Generation (AR2G) Biosensors. Binding studies were performed by dipping
the biosensors in varying concentrations of HspD-NTD. An equal number of
unliganded sensors was used as control, to account for non-specific binding. The
traces were processed using ForteBio Data Analysis Software, ver. 8.0.3.5,
exported and fit globally using Biaevaluation 3.0.1. A simple 1:1 Langmuir
interaction model was used for fitting the data.For the competitive binding assay, ATP at two concentrations of
30 μM and 300 μM was added to
HspD-NTD with a fixed concentration of 300 μM and the
binding of the protein to the peptide was monitored.
Additional Information
Accession codes: The structures of HspD-NTD complexes have been submitted to
the Protein Data Bank with the following PDB codes: 4XE2 for peptide complex, 4XCJ
for ADP complex, 4XC0 for AMPPCP complex, 4XCL for ATPγS complex, 4XD8
for AMPPNP complex and 4XDM for geldanamycin complex.How to cite this article: Raman, S. et al. First Structural View of a
Peptide Interacting with the Nucleotide Binding Domain of Heat Shock Protein 90.
Sci. Rep.
5, 17015; doi: 10.1038/srep17015 (2015).
Authors: Victoria Smith; Edward A Sausville; Richard F Camalier; Heinz-Herbert Fiebig; Angelika M Burger Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2005-04-20 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: David B Solit; S Percy Ivy; Catherine Kopil; Rachel Sikorski; Michael J Morris; Susan F Slovin; W Kevin Kelly; Anthony DeLaCruz; Tracy Curley; Glenn Heller; Steven Larson; Lawrence Schwartz; Merrill J Egorin; Neal Rosen; Howard I Scher Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-03-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Thomas C Terwilliger; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Pavel V Afonine; Nigel W Moriarty; Peter H Zwart; Li Wei Hung; Randy J Read; Paul D Adams Journal: Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr Date: 2007-12-05
Authors: Airlie J McCoy; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Paul D Adams; Martyn D Winn; Laurent C Storoni; Randy J Read Journal: J Appl Crystallogr Date: 2007-07-13 Impact factor: 3.304