Literature DB >> 26598999

Differentiation of subtypes of renal cell carcinoma with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Li-Yun Xue1,2, Qing Lu1,2, Bei-Jian Huang1,2, Cui-Xian Li1,2, Li-Xia Yan1,2, Wen-Ping Wang1,2.   

Abstract

We aimed to assess the difference of enhancement patterns among the three RCC subtypes with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Two hundreds cases of pathologically proved clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCC), 58 papillary renal cell carcinomas (pRCC) and 51 chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (chRCC) underwent preoperative conventional ultrasound and CEUS. The wash-in and wash-out pattern, peak enhancement degree and homogeneity, and the presence of pseudocapsule were evaluated by two blinded observers respectively. The interreader agreement in the characterization of CEUS features between two observers was good (κ  = 0.649-0.775). Compared with pRCCs and chRCCs, ccRCCs demonstrated higher frequency of simultaneous wash-in pattern, hyperenhancement and heterogeneity with necrotic areas. Most pRCCs and chRCCs manifested hypoenhancement, homogeneity, fast wash-out and presence of pseudocapsule. The only difference we obtained between pRCC and chRCC was the wash-in pattern, with slow wash-in in pRCC and simultaneous wash-in in chRCC. In small lesions with long diameter≤3 cm, the majority of the three subtypes of RCC showed homogeneous enhancement and there was no difference among them. CEUS was a useful method to preoperatively differentiate the ccRCC from non-ccRCC subtypes. There were no distinguishing features identifid on CEUS that allowed reliable differentiation of pRCC from chRCC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clear cell renal cell carcinoma; chromophobe renal cell carcinoma; contrast-enhanced ultrasonography; differential diagnosis; papillary renal cell carcinoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26598999     DOI: 10.3233/CH-152024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Hemorheol Microcirc        ISSN: 1386-0291            Impact factor:   2.375


  11 in total

1.  Differentiating solid, non-macroscopic fat containing, enhancing renal masses using fast Fourier transform analysis of multiphase CT.

Authors:  Bino A Varghese; Frank Chen; Darryl H Hwang; Steven Y Cen; Inderbir S Gill; Vinay A Duddalwar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  The quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differentiation of small renal cell carcinoma subtypes and angiomyolipoma.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Hongli Cao; Lin Chen; Liang Fang; Yingchun Liu; Jia Zhan; Xuehong Diao; Yue Chen
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-01

3.  Metanephric adenoma: association between the imaging features of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and clinicopathological characteristics.

Authors:  Dongmei Zhu; Lin Zhu; Ji Wu; Linghu Wu; Jian Li; Hao Luo; Keen Yang; Gang Liu; Xiaoguang Quo; Fajin Dong; Jinfeng Xu
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-08

4.  Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Evaluation of Renal Masses with Histopathological Validation-Results from a Prospective Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Antonio Tufano; Francesco Maria Drudi; Flavia Angelini; Eleonora Polito; Milvia Martino; Antonio Granata; Giovanni Battista Di Pierro; Eriselda Kutrolli; Matteo Sampalmieri; Vittorio Canale; Rocco Simone Flammia; Daniele Fresilli; Michele Bertolotto; Costantino Leonardo; Giorgio Franco; Vito Cantisani
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-12

Review 5.  Long Non-Coding RNAs as Novel Biomarkers in the Clinical Management of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients: A Promise or a Pledge?

Authors:  Francesco Trevisani; Matteo Floris; Riccardo Vago; Roberto Minnei; Alessandra Cinque
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 7.666

6.  Quantification of contrast-uptake as imaging biomarker for disease progression of renal cell carcinoma after tumor ablation.

Authors:  Bruno R Tegel; Steffen Huber; Lynn J Savic; MingDe Lin; Bernhard Gebauer; Jeffrey Pollak; Julius Chapiro
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 1.990

7.  Effect of iodinated contrast media on renal perfusion: A randomized comparison study in pigs using quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

Authors:  Philipp Lamby; Friedrich Jung; Stefanie Graf; Lotte Schellenberg; Johannes Falter; Natascha Platz-da-Silva; Stephan Schreml; Lukas Prantl; Ralf P Franke; Ernst M Jung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Expanding the Role of Ultrasound for the Characterization of Renal Masses.

Authors:  Eduard Roussel; Riccardo Campi; Daniele Amparore; Riccardo Bertolo; Umberto Carbonara; Selcuk Erdem; Alexandre Ingels; Önder Kara; Laura Marandino; Michele Marchioni; Stijn Muselaers; Nicola Pavan; Angela Pecoraro; Benoit Beuselinck; Ivan Pedrosa; David Fetzer; Maarten Albersen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Predictive value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with conventional ultrasound in solid renal parenchymal lesions.

Authors:  Yingyu Cai; Fan Li; Zhaojun Li; Xin Li; Chunxiao Li; Zhen Xia; Lianfang Du; Rong Wu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 3.629

10.  The independent indicators for differentiating renal cell carcinoma from renal angiomyolipoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Hongli Cao; Liang Fang; Lin Chen; Jia Zhan; Xuehong Diao; Yingchun Liu; Chen Lu; Zhengwang Zhang; Yue Chen
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 1.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.