Literature DB >> 26598535

Long-Term Impact of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Screening Program on Cancer Incidence and Mortality-Model-Based Exploration of the Serrated Pathway.

Marjolein J E Greuter1, Erhan Demirel2, Jie-Bin Lew3, Johannes Berkhof2, Xiang-Ming Xu3, Karen Canfell3, Evelien Dekker4, Gerrit A Meijer5, Veerle M H Coupé2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to predict the long-term colorectal cancer incidence, mortality, and colonoscopy demand of the recently implemented Dutch colorectal cancer screening program.
METHODS: The Adenoma and Serrated pathway to Colorectal Cancer model was set up to simulate the Dutch screening program consisting of biennial fecal immunochemical testing combined with the new Dutch surveillance guidelines, between 2014 and 2044. The impact of screening and surveillance was evaluated under three sets of natural history assumptions differing in the contribution of the serrated pathway to colorectal cancer incidence. In sensitivity analyses, other assumptions concerning the serrated pathway were varied. Model-predicted outcomes were yearly colorectal cancer incidence, mortality, and colonoscopy demand per year.
RESULTS: Assuming an aging population, colorectal cancer incidence under 30 years of screening is predicted to decrease by 35% and 31% for a contribution of 0% and 30% of the serrated pathway to colorectal cancer, respectively. For colorectal cancer mortality, reductions are 47% and 45%. In 2044, 110,000 colonoscopies will be required annually assuming no contribution of the serrated pathway (27 per 1,000 individuals in the screening age range). Including the serrated pathway influences predicted screening effectiveness if serrated lesions are neither detected nor treated at colonoscopy, and/or if colorectal cancers arising from serrated lesions have substantially lower survival rates than those arising from adenomas.
CONCLUSIONS: The Dutch screening program will markedly decrease colorectal cancer incidence and mortality but considerable colonoscopy resources will be required. IMPACT: Predictions of long-term screening effectiveness are preferably based on both pathways to colorectal cancer to transparently describe the impact of uncertainties regarding the serrated pathway on long-term predictions. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26598535     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  6 in total

1.  The potential of imaging techniques as a screening tool for colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Marjolein J E Greuter; Johannes Berkhof; Remond J A Fijneman; Erhan Demirel; Jie-Bin Lew; Gerrit A Meijer; Jaap Stoker; Veerle M H Coupé
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Estimating the Effect of Targeted Screening Strategies: An Application to Colonoscopy and Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Duncan C Thomas
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  National cohort study on postoperative risks after surgery for submucosal invasive colorectal cancer.

Authors:  N C A Vermeer; Y Backes; H S Snijders; E Bastiaannet; G J Liefers; L M G Moons; C J H van de Velde; K C M J Peeters
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2018-12-24

4.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative colorectal cancer screening strategies in high-risk individuals.

Authors:  Robert Benamouzig; Stéphanie Barré; Jean-Christophe Saurin; Henri Leleu; Alexandre Vimont; Sabrine Taleb; Frédéric De Bels
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 4.409

5.  How a faecal immunochemical test screening programme changes annual colorectal cancer incidence rates: an Italian intention-to-screen study.

Authors:  Lauro Bucchi; Silvia Mancini; Flavia Baldacchini; Alessandra Ravaioli; Orietta Giuliani; Rosa Vattiato; Federica Zamagni; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Cinzia Campari; Debora Canuti; Enza Di Felice; Priscilla Sassoli de Bianchi; Stefano Ferretti; Nicoletta Bertozzi; Annibale Biggeri; Fabio Falcini
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 9.075

6.  Lessons From a Systematic Literature Search on Diagnostic DNA Methylation Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer: How to Increase Research Value and Decrease Research Waste?

Authors:  Zheng Feng; Cary J G Oberije; Alouisa J P van de Wetering; Alexander Koch; Kim A D Wouters; Nathalie Vaes; Ad A M Masclee; Beatriz Carvalho; Gerrit A Meijer; Maurice P Zeegers; James G Herman; Veerle Melotte; Manon van Engeland; Kim M Smits
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.396

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.