| Literature DB >> 26597959 |
Nitya Meenakshi Raman1, Pooja Harish Shah2, Misha Mohan3, Suganthi Ramasamy4.
Abstract
Melanins areEntities:
Keywords: Aspergillus fumigatus; Melanin; Plackett–Burman design; Response-surface methodology
Year: 2015 PMID: 26597959 PMCID: PMC4656259 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-015-0161-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Media composition for determination of C:N ratio
| Initial concentration of dextrose | Peptone (g/L) | Initial C:N | Additional peptone added (g/L) | Equivalent C:N |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 2.66 | 7.2:1 | 16 | 25.25:1 |
| 8 | 2.66 | 16.2:1 | 12 | 25.25:1 |
| 16 | 2.66 | 20.65:1 | 4 | 25.25:1 |
Experimental variables at different levels used for production of Melanin
| Factors | Variable | Units | Experimental values | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low (−1) | High (+1) | |||
| 1 | pH | 5 | 9 | |
| 2 | Temperature | °C | 40 | 50 |
| 3 | Inoculum volume | CFU/Ml | 0.5 | 1.5 |
| 4 | Incubation time | Days | 3 | 7 |
| 5 | Substrate | g | 3 | 7 |
| 6 | Moisture content | % | 10 | 25 |
| 7 | Sodium dihydrogen phosphate | g | 10 | 14 |
| 8 | Potassium dihydrogen phosphate | g | 1 | 3 |
| 9 | Magnesium sulphate | g | 0.1 | 0.5 |
| 10 | Calcium chloride | g | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| 11 | Ferrous sulphate | g | 0.1 | 1 |
Twelve trial Plackett Burman design matrix for the experimental variables with coded values for melanin production
| Runs | Experimental parameter | Response (mg/L) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | ||
| 1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | 15.6 |
| 2 | −1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | 16.7 |
| 3 | −1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | 17.5 |
| 4 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | 11.8 |
| 5 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 19.8 |
| 6 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | 17.6 |
| 7 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 16.7 |
| 8 | +1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | 12.3 |
| 9 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | 14.5 |
| 10 | −1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | 18.9 |
| 11 | +1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | 14.9 |
| 12 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | 12.3 |
Experimental variables for RSM at different levels used for production of Melanin
| Factors | Variables | Units | Experimental values | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | +1 | |||
| A | Temperature | °C | 40 | 45 | 50 |
| B | Sodium dihydrogen phosphate | g | 10 | 12 | 14 |
| C | Moisture | % | 10 | 17.5 | 25 |
Fig. 1Variation in the production of dry weight and melanin production of the A. fumigatus AFGRD105 over a period of 10 days
Fig. 2Effect of carbon source, dextrose, peptone and yeast extract on mycelial dry weight and melanin production by A. fumigatus AFGRD105
Fig. 3a Production of melanin for various C:N ratio. b Comparison of melanin production and biomass of Aspergillus fumigatus inoculated as hyphal and spore suspensions
Seventeen trial Box–Behnken design matrix for the experimental variables with coded values
| Runs | Experimental parameter | Response (mg/L) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | ||
| 1 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 16.5 |
| 2 | +1 | 0 | −1 | 17.1 |
| 3 | −1 | +1 | 0 | 13.5 |
| 4 | 0 | −1 | +1 | 23.5 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19.5 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14.3 |
| 7 | +1 | +1 | 0 | 13.2 |
| 8 | +1 | −1 | 0 | 20.1 |
| 9 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 19.5 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.7 |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.3 |
| 12 | −1 | 0 | +1 | 22.5 |
| 13 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 29.3 |
| 14 | +1 | 0 | +1 | 31.9 |
| 15 | 0 | +1 | −1 | 22.4 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21.6 |
| 17 | 0 | +1 | +1 | 32.6 |
Fig. 4The surface plots of response surface methodology showing the effect of temperature, moisture and sodium dihydrogen phosphate and their mutual interaction on melanin production. a Sodium diphosphate and temparature; b Temperature and Moisture; c Moisture and Sodium diphosphate. d Melanin production before and after optimization