Literature DB >> 2659723

Cellular requirements for renal allograft rejection in the athymic nude rat.

E M Bolton1, J A Gracie, J D Briggs, J Kampinga, J A Bradley.   

Abstract

This study has examined the ability of adoptively transferred CD4+ and CD8+ T cells to mediate rejection of a fully allogeneic DA renal graft in the PVG nude rat. Transfer, at the time of transplantation, of naive CD4+ T cells caused rapid graft rejection and primed CD4+ cells were several times more potent. In contrast, naive or specifically sensitized CD8+ cells were entirely ineffective at mediating renal allograft rejection. Whereas nonrejecting grafts showed only a mild cellular infiltrate, rejecting grafts in CD4+ reconstituted animals showed a substantial infiltrate and many of the infiltrating cells had a phenotype (MRC OX8+, MRC OX19-), consistent with NK cells. Experiments using a mAb (HIS 41) against an allotypic determinant of the leukocyte common antigen confirmed that the majority (greater than 80%) of the cellular infiltrate in rejecting grafts derived from the host rather than from the CD4+ inoculum. Infiltrating mononuclear cells, obtained from rejecting allografts 7 d after transplantation in CD4+-injected PVG nude hosts, showed high levels of in vitro cytotoxicity against not only kidney donor strain Con A blasts but also third-party allogeneic Con A blasts, as well as against both NK and LAK susceptible targets. When splenocytes from nontransplanted nude PVG rats were tested in vitro they also demonstrated high levels of lytic activity against both NK and LAK susceptible targets as well as allogeneic Con A blasts, which were not susceptible to lysis by spleen cells from euthymic rats. These findings suggest that injected CD4+ cells may cause renal allograft rejection by the recruitment of extrathymically derived, widely alloreactive cells into the kidney in this model of graft rejection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2659723      PMCID: PMC2189330          DOI: 10.1084/jem.169.6.1931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Med        ISSN: 0022-1007            Impact factor:   14.307


  41 in total

1.  Subsets of T cells in the rat mediating lethal graft versus-host disease.

Authors:  D W Mason
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  The roles of host and donor cells in the rejection of skin allografts by T cell-deprived rats injected with syngeneic T cells.

Authors:  M J Dallman; D W Mason; M Webb
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Endogenously produced Ia antigens within cells of convoluted tubules of rat kidney.

Authors:  D N Hart; J W Fabre
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  Purification of human C3b inactivator by monoclonal-antibody affinity chromatography.

Authors:  L Hsiung; A N Barclay; M R Brandon; E Sim; R R Porter
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1982-04-01       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  The role of T cell differentiation markers in antigen-specific and lectin-dependent cellular cytotoxicity mediated by T8+ and T4+ human cytotoxic T cell clones directed at class I and class II MHC antigens.

Authors:  H Spits; J Borst; C Terhorst; J E de Vries
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  A repopulation assay for B and T lymphocyte stem cells employing radiation chimaeras.

Authors:  S V Hunt; M H Fowler
Journal:  Cell Tissue Kinet       Date:  1981-07

7.  Mouse monoclonal antibodies against rat major histocompatibility antigens. Two Ia antigens and expression of Ia and class I antigens in rat thymus.

Authors:  T Fukumoto; W R McMaster; A F Williams
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  The architecture of rat lymph nodes. III. The lymph nodes and lymph-borne cells of the congenitally athymic nude rat (rnu).

Authors:  S Fossum; M E Smith; E B Bell; W L Ford
Journal:  Scand J Immunol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.487

9.  Immune response genes controlling responsiveness to major transplantation antigens. Specific major histocompatibility complex-linked defect for antibody responses to class I alloantigens.

Authors:  G W Butcher; J R Corvalán; D R Licence; J C Howard
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1982-01-01       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  Cells mediating graft rejection in the mouse. I. Lyt-1 cells mediate skin graft rejection.

Authors:  B E Loveland; P M Hogarth; R Ceredig; I F McKenzie
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1981-05-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  12 in total

1.  Asialo GM1(+) CD8(+) T cells play a critical role in costimulation blockade-resistant allograft rejection.

Authors:  J Trambley; A W Bingaman; A Lin; E T Elwood; S Y Waitze; J Ha; M M Durham; M Corbascio; S R Cowan; T C Pearson; C P Larsen
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Prolongation of rat corneal graft survival by treatment with anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody.

Authors:  W Ayliffe; Y Alam; E B Bell; D McLeod; I V Hutchinson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Antigen location contributes to the pathological features of a transplanted heart graft.

Authors:  Yifa Chen; Yilmaz Demir; Anna Valujskikh; Peter S Heeger
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 4.  The role of graft-derived dendritic leukocytes in the rejection of vascularized organ allografts. Recent findings on the migration and function of dendritic leukocytes after transplantation.

Authors:  C P Larsen; J M Austyn; P J Morris
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Targeting the class IA PI3K isoforms p110α/δ attenuates heart allograft rejection in mice by suppressing the CD4+ T lymphocyte response.

Authors:  Chuanlei Yang; Xing Chen; Zhanjie Wei; Jie Xiao; Weiqiang Chen; Yuqiang Shang; Jinping Liu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

6.  Lymphocyte changes associated with prolongation of cardiac allograft survival in adult mice using anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody.

Authors:  T C Pearson; A R Bushell; C R Darby; L J West; P J Morris; K J Wood
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Ablation of Transcription Factor IRF4 Promotes Transplant Acceptance by Driving Allogenic CD4+ T Cell Dysfunction.

Authors:  Jie Wu; Hedong Zhang; Xiaomin Shi; Xiang Xiao; Yihui Fan; Laurie J Minze; Jin Wang; Rafik M Ghobrial; Jiahong Xia; Roger Sciammas; Xian C Li; Wenhao Chen
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 31.745

8.  Allograft rejection in athymic nude rats by transferred T-cell subsets. I. The response of naive CD4+ and CD8+ thoracic duct lymphocytes to complete allogeneic incompatibilities.

Authors:  E H Whitby; S M Sparshott; E B Bell
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 9.  Activation and regulation of alloreactive T cell immunity in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Charlotte Duneton; Pamela D Winterberg; Mandy L Ford
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 42.439

10.  T follicular helper and memory cell responses and the mTOR pathway in murine heart transplantation.

Authors:  Aini Xie; Hui Yan; Jinfei Fu; Adam He; Xiang Xiao; Xian C Li; Wenhao Chen
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 10.247

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.