Literature DB >> 26596672

Afatinib alone or afatinib plus vinorelbine versus investigator's choice of treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer with progressive brain metastases after trastuzumab, lapatinib, or both (LUX-Breast 3): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial.

Javier Cortés1, Véronique Dieras2, Jungsil Ro3, Jérôme Barriere4, Thomas Bachelot5, Sara Hurvitz6, Emilie Le Rhun7, Marc Espié8, Sung-Bae Kim9, Andreas Schneeweiss10, Joo Hyuk Sohn11, Jean-Marc Nabholtz12, Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen13, Julie Taguchi14, Federico Piacentini15, Eva Ciruelos16, Petri Bono17, Mahmoud Ould-Kaci18, Flavien Roux19, Heikki Joensuu17.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer frequently develop CNS metastases. The metastases that progress after brain radiotherapy and HER2-targeted systemic therapy are a difficult therapeutic challenge. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of afatinib, an irreversible blocker of the ErbB protein family, alone or combined with vinorelbine, compared with treatment of the investigator's choice in women with HER2-positive breast cancer with progressive brain metastases during or after treatment with trastuzumab, lapatinib, or both.
METHODS: We did this randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial in 40 hospitals in Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, South Korea, and the USA. Women older than 18 years with histologically confirmed HER2-overexpressing breast cancer and CNS recurrence or progression as determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST version 1.1) during or after treatment with trastuzumab, lapatinib, or both, were eligible. We randomly assigned patients (1:1:1) centrally to afatinib 40 mg orally once per day, afatinib 40 mg per day plus intravenous vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) once per week, or investigator's choice of treatment in cycles of 3 weeks until disease progression, patient withdrawal, or unacceptable toxicity. Treatment assignment was not masked for clinicians or patients, but the trial team was masked until database lock to reduce bias. The primary endpoint, assessed in the intention-to-treat population, was patient benefit at 12 weeks, defined by an absence of CNS or extra-CNS disease progression, no tumour-related worsening of neurological signs or symptoms, and no increase in corticosteroid dose. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of a study drug. This completed trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01441596.
FINDINGS: Between Dec 22, 2011, and Feb 12, 2013, we screened 132 patients, of whom 121 were eligible and randomly assigned to treatment: 40 to afatinib alone, 38 to afatinib plus vinorelbine, and 43 to investigator's choice. All patients discontinued study treatment before the data collection cutoff on Oct 16, 2014. Patient benefit was achieved in 12 (30·0%; 95% CI 16·6-46·5) patients given afatinib alone (difference vs investigator's choice: -11·9% [95% CI -32·9 to 9·7], p=0·37), 13 (34·2%; 19·6-51·4) given afatinib plus vinorelbine (difference vs investigator's choice: -7·6% [-28·9 to 14·2], p=0·63), and 18 (41·9%; 27·0-57·9) given investigator's choice. The most common treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were diarrhoea (seven [18%] of 40 patients in the afatinib only group vs nine [24%] of 37 patients in the afatinib plus vinorelbine group vs two [5%] of 42 patients in the investigator's choice group) and neutropenia (none vs 14 [38%] vs four [10%]).
INTERPRETATION: Patient benefit with afatinib-containing treatments was not different from that in patients given investigator's choice of treatments; however, adverse events were frequent and afatinib-containing treatments seemed to be less well tolerated. No further development of afatinib for HER2-positive breast cancer is currently planned. FUNDING: Boehringer Ingelheim.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26596672     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00373-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  40 in total

1.  Phase II study of irinotecan and temozolomide in breast cancer patients with progressing central nervous system disease.

Authors:  Michelle E Melisko; Michael Assefa; Jimmy Hwang; Amy DeLuca; John W Park; Hope S Rugo
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Neratinib Plus Capecitabine Provides a Glimmer of Hope for a Daunting Disease.

Authors:  Sara A Hurvitz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Current Treatment Options for Breast Cancer Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Arrvind Raghunath; Kunal Desai; Manmeet S Ahluwalia
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-02-15

Review 4.  Advances in systemic therapy for metastatic breast cancer: future perspectives.

Authors:  S P Corona; N Sobhani; A Ianza; G Roviello; G Mustacchi; M Bortul; F Zanconati; D Generali
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  ATTAIN: Phase III study of etirinotecan pegol versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with metastatic breast cancer and brain metastases.

Authors:  Debu Tripathy; Sara M Tolaney; Andrew D Seidman; Carey K Anders; Nuhad Ibrahim; Hope S Rugo; Chris Twelves; Veronique Dieras; Volkmar Müller; Mary Tagliaferri; Alison L Hannah; Javier Cortés
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 6.  Targeted Treatment of Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Nicole Shonka; Vyshak Alva Venur; Manmeet S Ahluwalia
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.081

7.  Landscape of combination therapy trials in breast cancer brain metastasis.

Authors:  Jawad Fares; Deepak Kanojia; Aida Rashidi; Ilya Ulasov; Maciej S Lesniak
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Safety and Efficacy Profile of Neratinib: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 23 Prospective Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Zhihang Tao; Stanley Xiangyu Li; Kai Shen; Yunuo Zhao; Hao Zeng; Xuelei Ma
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 9.  Updates in the management of brain metastases.

Authors:  Nils D Arvold; Eudocia Q Lee; Minesh P Mehta; Kim Margolin; Brian M Alexander; Nancy U Lin; Carey K Anders; Riccardo Soffietti; D Ross Camidge; Michael A Vogelbaum; Ian F Dunn; Patrick Y Wen
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 10.  Targeted Therapies for the Treatment of Brain Metastases in Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Jan-Paul Bohn; Georg Pall; Guenther Stockhammer; Michael Steurer
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.