Javier Cortés1, Véronique Dieras2, Jungsil Ro3, Jérôme Barriere4, Thomas Bachelot5, Sara Hurvitz6, Emilie Le Rhun7, Marc Espié8, Sung-Bae Kim9, Andreas Schneeweiss10, Joo Hyuk Sohn11, Jean-Marc Nabholtz12, Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen13, Julie Taguchi14, Federico Piacentini15, Eva Ciruelos16, Petri Bono17, Mahmoud Ould-Kaci18, Flavien Roux19, Heikki Joensuu17. 1. Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: jacortes@vhio.net. 2. Institut Curie, Paris, France. 3. National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Republic of Korea. 4. Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France. 5. Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France. 6. University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 7. Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; University Hospital, Lille, France. 8. Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France. 9. Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. 10. National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. 11. Severance Hospital, Sinchon-dong, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, South Korea. 12. Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France. 13. Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland. 14. Sansum Clinic, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. 15. Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. 16. Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain. 17. Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. 18. Boehringer Ingelheim, Paris, France. 19. Boehringer Ingelheim, Reims, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer frequently develop CNS metastases. The metastases that progress after brain radiotherapy and HER2-targeted systemic therapy are a difficult therapeutic challenge. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of afatinib, an irreversible blocker of the ErbB protein family, alone or combined with vinorelbine, compared with treatment of the investigator's choice in women with HER2-positive breast cancer with progressive brain metastases during or after treatment with trastuzumab, lapatinib, or both. METHODS: We did this randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial in 40 hospitals in Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, South Korea, and the USA. Women older than 18 years with histologically confirmed HER2-overexpressing breast cancer and CNS recurrence or progression as determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST version 1.1) during or after treatment with trastuzumab, lapatinib, or both, were eligible. We randomly assigned patients (1:1:1) centrally to afatinib 40 mg orally once per day, afatinib 40 mg per day plus intravenous vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) once per week, or investigator's choice of treatment in cycles of 3 weeks until disease progression, patient withdrawal, or unacceptable toxicity. Treatment assignment was not masked for clinicians or patients, but the trial team was masked until database lock to reduce bias. The primary endpoint, assessed in the intention-to-treat population, was patient benefit at 12 weeks, defined by an absence of CNS or extra-CNS disease progression, no tumour-related worsening of neurological signs or symptoms, and no increase in corticosteroid dose. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of a study drug. This completed trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01441596. FINDINGS:Between Dec 22, 2011, and Feb 12, 2013, we screened 132 patients, of whom 121 were eligible and randomly assigned to treatment: 40 toafatinib alone, 38 to afatinib plus vinorelbine, and 43 to investigator's choice. All patients discontinued study treatment before the data collection cutoff on Oct 16, 2014. Patient benefit was achieved in 12 (30·0%; 95% CI 16·6-46·5) patients given afatinib alone (difference vs investigator's choice: -11·9% [95% CI -32·9 to 9·7], p=0·37), 13 (34·2%; 19·6-51·4) given afatinib plus vinorelbine (difference vs investigator's choice: -7·6% [-28·9 to 14·2], p=0·63), and 18 (41·9%; 27·0-57·9) given investigator's choice. The most common treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were diarrhoea (seven [18%] of 40 patients in the afatinib only group vs nine [24%] of 37 patients in the afatinib plus vinorelbine group vs two [5%] of 42 patients in the investigator's choice group) and neutropenia (none vs 14 [38%] vs four [10%]). INTERPRETATION:Patient benefit with afatinib-containing treatments was not different from that in patients given investigator's choice of treatments; however, adverse events were frequent and afatinib-containing treatments seemed to be less well tolerated. No further development of afatinib for HER2-positive breast cancer is currently planned. FUNDING: Boehringer Ingelheim.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer frequently develop CNS metastases. The metastases that progress after brain radiotherapy and HER2-targeted systemic therapy are a difficult therapeutic challenge. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of afatinib, an irreversible blocker of the ErbB protein family, alone or combined with vinorelbine, compared with treatment of the investigator's choice in women with HER2-positive breast cancer with progressive brain metastases during or after treatment with trastuzumab, lapatinib, or both. METHODS: We did this randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial in 40 hospitals in Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, South Korea, and the USA. Women older than 18 years with histologically confirmed HER2-overexpressing breast cancer and CNS recurrence or progression as determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST version 1.1) during or after treatment with trastuzumab, lapatinib, or both, were eligible. We randomly assigned patients (1:1:1) centrally to afatinib 40 mg orally once per day, afatinib 40 mg per day plus intravenous vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) once per week, or investigator's choice of treatment in cycles of 3 weeks until disease progression, patient withdrawal, or unacceptable toxicity. Treatment assignment was not masked for clinicians or patients, but the trial team was masked until database lock to reduce bias. The primary endpoint, assessed in the intention-to-treat population, was patient benefit at 12 weeks, defined by an absence of CNS or extra-CNS disease progression, no tumour-related worsening of neurological signs or symptoms, and no increase in corticosteroid dose. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of a study drug. This completed trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01441596. FINDINGS: Between Dec 22, 2011, and Feb 12, 2013, we screened 132 patients, of whom 121 were eligible and randomly assigned to treatment: 40 to afatinib alone, 38 to afatinib plus vinorelbine, and 43 to investigator's choice. All patients discontinued study treatment before the data collection cutoff on Oct 16, 2014. Patient benefit was achieved in 12 (30·0%; 95% CI 16·6-46·5) patients given afatinib alone (difference vs investigator's choice: -11·9% [95% CI -32·9 to 9·7], p=0·37), 13 (34·2%; 19·6-51·4) given afatinib plus vinorelbine (difference vs investigator's choice: -7·6% [-28·9 to 14·2], p=0·63), and 18 (41·9%; 27·0-57·9) given investigator's choice. The most common treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were diarrhoea (seven [18%] of 40 patients in the afatinib only group vs nine [24%] of 37 patients in the afatinib plus vinorelbine group vs two [5%] of 42 patients in the investigator's choice group) and neutropenia (none vs 14 [38%] vs four [10%]). INTERPRETATION:Patient benefit with afatinib-containing treatments was not different from that in patients given investigator's choice of treatments; however, adverse events were frequent and afatinib-containing treatments seemed to be less well tolerated. No further development of afatinib for HER2-positive breast cancer is currently planned. FUNDING: Boehringer Ingelheim.
Authors: Michelle E Melisko; Michael Assefa; Jimmy Hwang; Amy DeLuca; John W Park; Hope S Rugo Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: S P Corona; N Sobhani; A Ianza; G Roviello; G Mustacchi; M Bortul; F Zanconati; D Generali Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2017-05-19 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Debu Tripathy; Sara M Tolaney; Andrew D Seidman; Carey K Anders; Nuhad Ibrahim; Hope S Rugo; Chris Twelves; Veronique Dieras; Volkmar Müller; Mary Tagliaferri; Alison L Hannah; Javier Cortés Journal: Future Oncol Date: 2019-05-10 Impact factor: 3.404
Authors: Nils D Arvold; Eudocia Q Lee; Minesh P Mehta; Kim Margolin; Brian M Alexander; Nancy U Lin; Carey K Anders; Riccardo Soffietti; D Ross Camidge; Michael A Vogelbaum; Ian F Dunn; Patrick Y Wen Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 12.300