Michelle E Melisko1, Michael Assefa2, Jimmy Hwang3, Amy DeLuca4, John W Park4, Hope S Rugo4. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. michelle.melisko@ucsf.edu. 2. Wellstar Atlanta Medical Center, Atlanta, GA, USA. 3. Emeritus Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 4. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Breast cancer patients with progressing central nervous system (CNS) disease have limited treatment options. Few chemotherapy drugs with activity in breast cancer have well-documented CNS penetration. This phase 2 trial evaluated efficacy and safety of irinotecan 125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 with temozolomide 100 mg/m2 days 1-7 and days 15-21 of a 28 day cycle. METHODS: Breast cancer patients of any biological subtype and progressing brain metastases and/or leptomeningeal disease (LMD) were eligible. The primary endpoint was CNS response rate. Secondary endpoints were clinical benefit rate (CBR), time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). Imaging studies evaluating intracranial and extracranial response were performed every 8 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty patients were evaluable for safety and efficacy. The most common hematologic and non-hematologic adverse events were neutropenia, and nausea and fatigue, respectively. There were two confirmed CNS partial responses (PR) and five patients with stable disease in the CNS ≥ 16 weeks, resulting in a 7% PR and 23% CBR. Median TTP was 2.3 months (range 13-444 days), and median OS from treatment initiation until death was 4.9 months (range 20-1023 days). Excluding patients with LMD, median TTP and OS were 3.1 and 5.6 months, respectively. Only one patient progressed systemically before CNS progression. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of irinotecan and temozolomide was well tolerated, demonstrated some clinical activity across multiple breast cancer subtypes with progressing CNS disease, and offers a reasonable option for patients who are not candidates for further radiation or clinical trials.
PURPOSE:Breast cancerpatients with progressing central nervous system (CNS) disease have limited treatment options. Few chemotherapy drugs with activity in breast cancer have well-documented CNS penetration. This phase 2 trial evaluated efficacy and safety of irinotecan 125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 with temozolomide 100 mg/m2 days 1-7 and days 15-21 of a 28 day cycle. METHODS:Breast cancerpatients of any biological subtype and progressing brain metastases and/or leptomeningeal disease (LMD) were eligible. The primary endpoint was CNS response rate. Secondary endpoints were clinical benefit rate (CBR), time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). Imaging studies evaluating intracranial and extracranial response were performed every 8 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty patients were evaluable for safety and efficacy. The most common hematologic and non-hematologic adverse events were neutropenia, and nausea and fatigue, respectively. There were two confirmed CNS partial responses (PR) and five patients with stable disease in the CNS ≥ 16 weeks, resulting in a 7% PR and 23% CBR. Median TTP was 2.3 months (range 13-444 days), and median OS from treatment initiation until death was 4.9 months (range 20-1023 days). Excluding patients with LMD, median TTP and OS were 3.1 and 5.6 months, respectively. Only one patient progressed systemically before CNS progression. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of irinotecan and temozolomide was well tolerated, demonstrated some clinical activity across multiple breast cancer subtypes with progressing CNS disease, and offers a reasonable option for patients who are not candidates for further radiation or clinical trials.
Entities:
Keywords:
Brain metastases; Breast cancer; Chemotherapy; Clinical trial; Irinotecan; Temozolomide
Authors: Nancy D Doolittle; David M Peereboom; Gregory A Christoforidis; Walter A Hall; Diane Palmieri; Penelope R Brock; Kathleen C M Campbell; D Thomas Dickey; Leslie L Muldoon; Brian Patrick O'Neill; Darryl R Peterson; Brad Pollock; Carole Soussain; Quentin Smith; Rose Marie Tyson; Edward A Neuwelt Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2006-07-21 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Johanna C Bendell; Susan M Domchek; Harold J Burstein; Lyndsay Harris; Jerry Younger; Irene Kuter; Craig Bunnell; Montse Rue; Rebecca Gelman; Eric Winer Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-06-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Nancy U Lin; Lisa A Carey; Minetta C Liu; Jerry Younger; Steven E Come; Matthew Ewend; Gordon J Harris; Elizabeth Bullitt; Annick D Van den Abbeele; John W Henson; Xiaochun Li; Rebecca Gelman; Harold J Burstein; Elizabeth Kasparian; David G Kirsch; Ann Crawford; Fred Hochberg; Eric P Winer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-04-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Rachel A Freedman; Rebecca S Gelman; Jeffrey S Wefel; Michelle E Melisko; Kenneth R Hess; Roisin M Connolly; Catherine H Van Poznak; Polly A Niravath; Shannon L Puhalla; Nuhad Ibrahim; Kimberly L Blackwell; Beverly Moy; Christina Herold; Minetta C Liu; Alarice Lowe; Nathalie Y R Agar; Nicole Ryabin; Sarah Farooq; Elizabeth Lawler; Mothaffar F Rimawi; Ian E Krop; Antonio C Wolff; Eric P Winer; Nancy U Lin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sara Hurvitz; Rashi Singh; Brad Adams; Julie A Taguchi; David Chan; Robert A Dichmann; Aurelio Castrellon; Eddie Hu; Jonathan Berkowitz; Aruna Mani; Brian DiCarlo; Rena Callahan; Ira Smalberg; Xiaoyan Wang; Ivana Meglar; Diego Martinez; Evthokia Hobbs; Dennis J Slamon Journal: Ther Adv Med Oncol Date: 2018-11-09 Impact factor: 8.168
Authors: Rachel A Freedman; Rebecca S Gelman; Carey K Anders; Michelle E Melisko; Heather A Parsons; Anne M Cropp; Kelly Silvestri; Christine M Cotter; Kathryn P Componeschi; Juan M Marte; Roisin M Connolly; Beverly Moy; Catherine H Van Poznak; Kimberly L Blackwell; Shannon L Puhalla; Rachel C Jankowitz; Karen L Smith; Nuhad Ibrahim; Timothy J Moynihan; Ciara C O'Sullivan; Julie Nangia; Polly Niravath; Nadine Tung; Paula R Pohlmann; Robyn Burns; Mothaffar F Rimawi; Ian E Krop; Antonio C Wolff; Eric P Winer; Nancy U Lin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-03-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Carey Anders; Allison M Deal; Vandana Abramson; Minetta C Liu; Anna M Storniolo; John T Carpenter; Shannon Puhalla; Rita Nanda; Amal Melhem-Bertrandt; Nancy U Lin; P Kelly Marcom; Catherine Van Poznak; Vered Stearns; Michelle Melisko; J Keith Smith; Olga Karginova; Joel Parker; Jonathan Berg; Eric P Winer; Amy Peterman; Aleix Prat; Charles M Perou; Antonio C Wolff; Lisa A Carey Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Kate R Secombe; Imogen A Ball; Joseph Shirren; Anthony D Wignall; Dorothy M Keefe; Joanne M Bowen Journal: Breast Cancer Date: 2020-07-18 Impact factor: 4.239
Authors: Bronwen J Mayo; Kate R Secombe; Anthony D Wignall; Emma Bateman; Daniel Thorpe; Claudio Pietra; Dorothy M Keefe; Joanne M Bowen Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2020-02-14 Impact factor: 3.333