Literature DB >> 26595429

Prospective Multicenter Assessment of Early Complication Rates Associated With Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery in 78 Patients.

Justin S Smith1, Subaraman Ramchandran, Virginie Lafage, Christopher I Shaffrey, Tamir Ailon, Eric Klineberg, Themistocles Protopsaltis, Frank J Schwab, Michael OʼBrien, Richard Hostin, Munish Gupta, Gregory Mundis, Robert Hart, Han Jo Kim, Peter G Passias, Justin K Scheer, Vedat Deviren, Douglas C Burton, Robert Eastlack, Shay Bess, Todd J Albert, K Daniel Riew, Christopher P Ames.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few reports have focused on treatment of adult cervical deformity (ACD).
OBJECTIVE: To present early complication rates associated with ACD surgery.
METHODS: A prospective multicenter database of consecutive operative ACD patients was reviewed for early (≤30 days from surgery) complications. Enrollment required at least 1 of the following: cervical kyphosis >10 degrees, cervical scoliosis >10 degrees, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis >4 cm, or chin-brow vertical angle >25 degrees.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients underwent surgical treatment for ACD (mean age, 60.8 years). Surgical approaches included anterior-only (14%), posterior-only (49%), anterior-posterior (35%), and posterior-anterior-posterior (3%). Mean numbers of fused anterior and posterior vertebral levels were 4.7 and 9.4, respectively. A total of 52 early complications were reported, including 26 minor and 26 major. Twenty-two (28.2%) patients had at least 1 minor complication, and 19 (24.4%) had at least 1 major complication. Overall, 34 (43.6%) patients had at least 1 complication. The most common complications included dysphagia (11.5%), deep wound infection (6.4%), new C5 motor deficit (6.4%), and respiratory failure (5.1%). One (1.3%) mortality occurred. Early complication rates differed significantly by surgical approach: anterior-only (27.3%), posterior-only (68.4%), and anterior-posterior/posterior-anterior-posterior (79.3%) (P = .007).
CONCLUSION: This report provides benchmark rates for overall and specific ACD surgery complications. Although the surgical approach(es) used were likely driven by the type and complexity of deformity, there were significantly higher complication rates associated with combined and posterior-only approaches compared with anterior-only approaches. These findings may prove useful in treatment planning, patient counseling, and ongoing efforts to improve safety of care. ABBREVIATIONS: 3CO, 3-column osteotomiesACD, adult cervical deformityEBL, estimated blood lossISSG, International Spine Study groupSVA, sagittal vertical axis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26595429     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  13 in total

1.  Accuracy of 3D fluoro-navigated anterior transpedicular screws in the subaxial cervical spine: an experimental study on human specimens.

Authors:  Jan Bredow; C Meyer; F Siedek; W F Neiss; L Löhrer; L P Müller; P Eysel; G Stein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Osteotomies in ankylosing spondylitis: where, how many, and how much?

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Juliane Koller; Michael Mayer; Axel Hempfing; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Etiology and treatment of cervical kyphosis: state of the art review-a narrative review.

Authors:  Yoji Ogura; John R Dimar; Mladen Djurasovic; Leah Y Carreon
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09

4.  Cervical rotational osteotomy for correction of axial deformity in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Jun Li; Fang-Cai Li; Qi-Xin Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 2.721

5.  Characteristics of deformity surgery in patients with severe and rigid cervical kyphosis (CK): results of the CSRS-Europe multi-centre study project.

Authors:  H Koller; C Ames; H Mehdian; R Bartels; R Ferch; V Deriven; H Toyone; C Shaffrey; J Smith; W Hitzl; J Schröder; Yohan Robinson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Comparison of Best Versus Worst Clinical Outcomes for Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery.

Authors:  Justin S Smith; Christopher I Shaffrey; Han Jo Kim; Peter Passias; Themistocles Protopsaltis; Renaud Lafage; Gregory M Mundis; Eric Klineberg; Virginie Lafage; Frank J Schwab; Justin K Scheer; Michael Kelly; D Kojo Hamilton; Munish Gupta; Vedat Deviren; Richard Hostin; Todd Albert; K Daniel Riew; Robert Hart; Doug Burton; Shay Bess; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-08-16

7.  Cervical Spine Deformity Correction Techniques.

Authors:  Alexander B Dru; Dennis Timothy Lockney; Sasha Vaziri; Matthew Decker; Adam J Polifka; W Christopher Fox; Daniel J Hoh
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-09-30

8.  Limited morbidity and possible radiographic benefit of C2 vs. subaxial cervical upper-most instrumented vertebrae.

Authors:  Peter G Passias; Cole A Bortz; Frank Segreto; Samantha Horn; Katherine E Pierce; Haddy Alas; Avery E Brown; Renaud Lafage; Virginie Lafage; Justin S Smith; Breton Line; Robert Eastlack; Daniel M Sciubba; Eric O Klineberg; Alexandra Soroceanu; Douglas C Burton; Frank J Schwab; Shay Bess; Christopher I Shaffrey; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-06

9.  A Comparative Analysis of Patients Undergoing Fusion for Adult Cervical Deformity by Approach Type.

Authors:  Kunal Varshneya; Zachary A Medress; Martin N Stienen; Jay Nathan; Allen Ho; Arjun V Pendharkar; Sheri Loo; Jessica Aikin; Gordon Li; Atman Desai; John K Ratliff; Anand Veeravagu
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-04-13

Review 10.  Pathological Features and Surgical Strategies of Cervical Deformity.

Authors:  Xiangyao Sun; Siyuan Sun; Chao Kong; Wei Wang; Tongtong Zhang; Junzhe Ding; Xiangyu Li; Shibao Lu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.