The title carbamate monohydrates, C13H12N2O2·H2O and C12H9BrN2O2·H2O, form isomorphous crystals that are isostructural in their primary hydrogen-bonding modes. In both carbamates, the primary hydrogen bonding and aggregation involves cyclic amide-water-pyridine moieties as (N-H⋯O-H⋯N)2 dimers about inversion centres [as R 4 (4)(14) rings], where the participation of strong hydrogen-bonding donors and acceptors is maximized. The remaining water-carbonyl O-H⋯O=C inter-action extends the aggregation into two-dimensional planar sheets that stack parallel to the (100) plane. The Br derivative does not participate in halogen bonding. A weak intra-molecular C-H⋯O hydrogen bond is observed in each compound.
The title carbamate monohydrates, C13H12N2O2·H2O and C12H9BrN2O2·H2O, form isomorphous crystals that are isostructural in their primary hydrogen-bonding modes. In both carbamates, the primary hydrogen bonding and aggregation involves cyclic amide-water-pyridine moieties as (N-H⋯O-H⋯N)2 dimers about inversion centres [as R 4 (4)(14) rings], where the participation of strong hydrogen-bonding donors and acceptors is maximized. The remaining water-carbonyl O-H⋯O=C inter-action extends the aggregation into two-dimensional planar sheets that stack parallel to the (100) plane. The Br derivative does not participate in halogen bonding. A weak intra-molecular C-H⋯O hydrogen bond is observed in each compound.
Isomorphous crystals and isostructural compounds feature regularly in series of metalloorganic compounds, lanthanide derivatives as well as in halide-containing organics (RX, where X = F, Cl, Br, I and often including the methyl group, Me). Given the vast array of data available in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD; Groom & Allen, 2014 ▸), the relative proportion of isostructural relationships between sets of crystal structures can readily be ascertained. As such, Oswald & Crichton (2009 ▸) have reported on the regularity with which chlorine (Cl) and methyl (Me) groups exhibit isostructurality based on analysis of pairs of compounds in the CSD (van de Streek & Motherwell, 2005 ▸), whereby an estimate of 25–30% of compound pairs are isostructural. In addition, Polito et al. (2008 ▸) have rationalized the differences and similarities between ortho-chloro and ortho-methylbenzoic acids, while the ability of bromines (as Br—C) as well as other halogens to form isostructural pairs/series with methyl groups is well documented (Capacci-Daniel et al., 2008 ▸).These researchers have reported an elegant example of an isostructural series of 1,3-bis(meta-dihalophenyl)ureas (with halo = Cl, Br, I) that form isomorphous crystals in space group P21212, (No. 18) and reported with mono- and di-tolyl analogues (Capacci-Daniel et al., 2008 ▸). The molecules associate via (N-H)2⋯O=C interactions into 1D chains [(6) motif] and with π–π stacking interactions and halogen contacts completing the aggregation. One can surmise that isostructural series in organic molecules are possible whereby 1-2 strong hydrogen bonds dominate the interactions and drive molecular association, despite often semi-effective cumulative competition from other interactions, whilst taking into account the effect of atom/group replacement (Groom & Allen, 2014 ▸).Further examples in coordination chemistry include the halogen-substituted pseudoterpyridine ZnII homoleptic mononuclear complexes that lack strong hydrogen bonding and with the packing relying on a subtle interplay of weaker interactions, where isostructurality is rare amongst the four (F/Cl/Br/I) halogens (Dumitru et al., 2013 ▸). Another example is where the metal complexes (CoII, NiII, CuII, ZnII) form an isostructural series when coordinated to a tetraarylazadipyromethene ligand (Palma et al., 2009 ▸). The interchangeability effects of C—H and C—F groups in series of isomeric fluorinated benzamides has been noted (Chopra & Guru Row, 2008 ▸; Donnelly et al., 2008 ▸) and for C—H/C—CH3 (Mocilac et al., 2010 ▸). More recently, Gomes and co-workers have reported four N-(4-halophenyl)-4-oxo-4H-chromene-3-carboxamides (halo = F/Cl/Br/I), where isostructural (F/Cl) and (Br/I) pairs are noted though all four compounds have similar supramolecular structures (Gomes et al., 2015 ▸).
Structural commentary
The carbamates synthesised from condensation reactions (shown in the scheme) as their methyl (CmoM) and bromo-derivatives (CmoBr) crystallize as isostructural monohydrates. The differences between the unit-cell parameters (a, b, c, β) are < 1% for CmoM (I) and CmoBr (II). Both molecules have similar geometric data (bond lengths and angles) apart from the (ortho)C—CH3/Br bond-length differences and some interplanar data. The molecules have three primary torsion angles along the molecular backbone namely benzeneC—C—O—C, C—O—C—N and C—N—C—Cpyridine where the molecule can adopt one of several conformations in solution. In (I) and (II), both aromatic rings are twisted from co-planarity with the four-membered OCON non-H carbamate atom backbone. The CmoM C6 ring is oriented at an angle of 87.83 (4)° to the central carbamate moiety which lies at an angle of 25.79 (7)° to the C5N ring; the corresponding data for CmoBr are 88.60 (11) and 26.67 (18)° and highlighting the similarities in the two molecular structures. For comparison, we have previously reported an isomer grid of nine related methoxycarbamates (C) ( = ortho-/meta-/para-) in order to compare their crystal structures and molecular models (Mocilac & Gallagher, 2013 ▸).In the C series (Mocilac & Gallagher, 2013 ▸), the primary interaction mode for all nine isomers is the amide⋯pyridine (as N—H⋯N) and typically aggregating as catemers, dimers or trimers. However, there is no evidence for the familiar N—H⋯O=C (amide⋯amide) type hydrogen bonding (Mocilac & Gallagher, 2013 ▸). This is in comparison to a series of related benzamides/carboxamides containing one strong donor/two strong acceptors where competition arises resulting in the formation of either (i) N—H⋯N or (ii) N—H⋯O=Chydrogen bonds as the primary strong interaction (Mocilac et al., 2010 ▸, 2012 ▸). In the title structures of CmoM (Fig. 1 ▸) and CmoBr (Fig. 2 ▸), the presence of a water molecule in the asymmetric unit was unexpected (water typically assists in the decomposition of organic carbamates at room temperature) though it can be shown to confer additional stability on the structure by forming compact hydrogen bonding and contributing to sheet formation. The retention of carbamate crystal structure integrity is observed over time (as measured in months).
Figure 1
View of the asymmetric unit of (I)·H2O, showing the atomic numbering schemes. Rotational disorder of the methyl group is depicted. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level.
Figure 2
View of the asymmetric unit of (II)·H2O, showing the atomic numbering schemes. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level.
Supramolecular features
The three primary hydrogen bonds in (I) and (II) as N1—H1⋯O1W, O1W—H1W⋯O1 and O1W—H2W⋯N23 (Tables 1 ▸ and 2 ▸) are classed as strong classical hydrogen bonds with donor–acceptor (D⋯A) distances < 2.95 Å and D—H⋯A angles close to linearity at 180°. In Figs. 3 ▸–5 ▸
▸ the crystal packing and interactions for CmoM are shown and in general are similar for CmoBr. The amide⋯water⋯pyridinehydrogen bonds facilitate aggregation of a centrosymmetric ring of hydrogen bonds [as (14) rings] (Fig. 3 ▸) which, when combined with the water⋯amide carbonyl (O=C) interaction, generates a compact flattened 2D sheet of hydrogen bonds that lies parallel to the (100) plane (Figs. 4 ▸ and 5 ▸). The hydrogen bonding intercepts the a-axis at 0.33 and 0.67 along the unit-cell axis and the sheet is a unit-cell length (a) in thickness with hydrophobic aromatic rings at the 2D sheet surfaces. The 3D crystal structure arises where 2D sheets stack parallel to the a-axis direction.
Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for CmoM
D—H⋯A
D—H
H⋯A
D⋯A
D—H⋯A
N1—H1⋯O1W
0.875 (16)
1.953 (16)
2.8274 (14)
179.1 (15)
O1W—H1W⋯O1i
0.85 (2)
2.06 (2)
2.9126 (15)
173.2 (18)
O1W—H2W⋯N23ii
0.86 (2)
1.97 (3)
2.8266 (16)
170.6 (19)
C26—H26⋯O1
0.93
2.43
2.9337 (15)
114
Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .
Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for CmoBr
D—H⋯A
D—H
H⋯A
D⋯A
D—H⋯A
N1—H1⋯O1W
0.74 (3)
2.10 (3)
2.832 (4)
177 (3)
O1W—H1W⋯O1i
0.75 (4)
2.18 (5)
2.924 (4)
177 (5)
O1W—H2W⋯N23ii
0.71 (4)
2.13 (4)
2.837 (4)
175 (4)
C26—H26⋯O1
0.93
2.44
2.946 (4)
114
Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .
Figure 3
Part of the crystal structure of (I) with the primary interactions as a hydrogen-bonded moiety of four carbamates surrounding two hydrogen-bonded water molecules and with selected labels. The symmetry-related molecules with suffices *, #, $ are positioned at (1 − x, 2 − y, −z), (1 − x, + y, − − z) and (x, − y, + z), respectively.
Figure 4
A packing diagram of the two-dimensional sheets and interlocking o-tolyl groups in CmoM (with aromatic C6 H atoms removed for clarity). Atoms are drawn as spheres of an arbitrary size.
Figure 5
A packing diagram of CmoM as two-dimensional sheets as viewed orthogonal to the direction shown in Fig. 4 ▸. Atoms are drawn as spheres of an arbitrary size with all H atoms included.
Synthesis and crystallisation
Carbamate formation (Cmo
; = Me, Br): The simplest method of phenyl-N-pyridinyl-carbamate (C
) synthesis is a condensation reaction of aminopyridines with commercially available phenylchloroformates in the presence of base (Et3N) and solvent (CH2Cl2). This is performed in an analogous fashion to the Schotten–Baumann reaction and can provide relatively pure products in high yields. However, when using 2-aminopyridines, additional double carbamates are formed where both of the N—H H atoms are replaced by formates. In order to minimize double carbamate formation for these derivatives, reactions are usually performed by mixing the reagents without solvent and base at lower temperature, followed by simple recrystallization.Another viable route into carbamate chemistry is to use an agent that transforms phenols into the required chloroformate; however, a simpler and more straightforward method for carbamate synthesis is the Curtius rearrangement reaction (or Curtius reaction or degradation) involving the rearrangement of an acyl azide to an isocyanate. The acyl azide (in this case pyridinyl azide) can be formed from the carboxylic acid by a suitable agent like diphenylphosphoryl azide. The acid can be easily converted to pyridinyl azides using diphenylphosphoryl azide and at higher temperature (343 K) in the presence of base. The pyridinyl azides rearrange into pyridinyl isocyanates and following reaction with a phenol, the required phenyl-N-pyridinyl-carbamate (C
) is generated.Reaction procedure: A mixture of isonicotinic acid (1.2877 g, 10.46 mmol), Et3N (1.46 ml, 10.46 mmol), and diphenylphosphoryl azide (2.258 ml, 10.46 mmol) was stirred for 1 h in 30 mL of dry acetonitrile at room temperature. The reaction mixture was carefully heated (water bath) to reflux for 1 h, then with 2-methylphenol or 2-bromophenol (10.46 mmol) added and the resulting solution heated at reflux temperatures for 7 h, gradually cooled and stirred overnight. If a white precipitate formed, it was filtered, washed with acetonitrile and dried (and usually found to be the pure product). The solvent was removed from the reaction mixture under reduced pressure, the residue dissolved in CH2Cl2, washed thrice with a solution of KHCO3 and Na2CO3 (pH = 9) and twice with brine/ammonium chloride (pH = 5). The organic fraction was removed in vacuo and the compound recrystallized from diethyl ether and CH2Cl2. If necessary, purification was accomplished by column chromatography using silica as the stationary phase and a mixture of CH2Cl2 and methanol (8:1) as mobile phase. Both ComM (46% yield, m.p. range = 352–357 K) and ComBr (21% yield, m.p. range = 359.2–359.9 K) compounds were obtained using this method (Mocilac, 2012 ▸).
Refinement
Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3 ▸. The refinement of structures (I) and (II) were performed similarly. H atoms attached to C atoms were treated as riding using the SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸) defaults at 294 (1) K with C—H = 0.93 Å (aromatic) and U
iso(H) = 1.2U
eq(C) (aromatic). The methyl C—H = 0.96 Å (aliphatic) and U
iso(H) = 1.5U
eq(C). The amino N—H and water O—H H atoms were refined with isotropic displacement parameters in both structures (I) and (II). In (I) the methyl group H atoms were refined as disordered over two sets of sites with equal occupancies 60° apart.
Table 3
Experimental details
CmoM
CmoBr
Crystal data
Chemical formula
C13H12N2O2·H2O
C12H9BrN2O2·H2O
Mr
246.26
311.14
Crystal system, space group
Monoclinic, P21/c
Monoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)
294
294
a, b, c (Å)
10.9754 (2), 12.9877 (2), 8.9544 (2)
10.9036 (4), 13.0518 (3), 8.9804 (3)
β (°)
96.546 (2)
96.460 (3)
V (Å3)
1268.09 (4)
1269.90 (7)
Z
4
4
Radiation type
Mo Kα
Mo Kα
μ (mm−1)
0.09
3.24
Crystal size (mm)
0.61 × 0.36 × 0.19
0.35 × 0.20 × 0.04
Data collection
Diffractometer
Agilent Xcalibur Sapphire3 Gemini Ultra
Agilent Xcalibur Sapphire3 Gemini Ultra
Absorption correction
Analytical (ABSFAC; Clark & Reid, 1998 ▸)
Analytical (ABSFAC; Clark and Reid, 1998 ▸)
Tmin, Tmax
0.962, 0.983
0.398, 0.844
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
14095, 4060, 2987
9904, 2811, 1881
Rint
0.017
0.029
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1)
0.739
0.658
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S
0.049, 0.136, 1.03
0.046, 0.106, 1.03
No. of reflections
4060
2811
No. of parameters
177
175
H-atom treatment
H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)
0.21, −0.16
0.68, −0.64
Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2012 ▸), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▸).
Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, CmoM, CmoBr. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015019556/lh5787sup1.cifStructure factors: contains datablock(s) CmoM. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015019556/lh5787CmoMsup2.hklStructure factors: contains datablock(s) CmoBr. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015019556/lh5787CmoBrsup3.hklClick here for additional data file.Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015019556/lh5787CmoMsup4.cmlClick here for additional data file.Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015019556/lh5787CmoBrsup5.cmlCCDC references: 1431472, 1431471Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Extinction coefficient: 0.017 (2)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes)
are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken
into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles
and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only
used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic)
treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s.
planes.
Absorption correction: analytical (ABSFAC; Clark and Reid, 1998)
k = −16→16
Tmin = 0.398, Tmax = 0.844
l = −8→11
9904 measured reflections
3330 standard reflections every 60 min
2811 independent reflections
intensity decay: 1%
1881 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Refinement on F2
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full
Secondary atom site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.046
Hydrogen site location: mixed
wR(F2) = 0.106
H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.03
w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0324P)2 + 1.3864P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2811 reflections
(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
175 parameters
Δρmax = 0.68 e Å−3
0 restraints
Δρmin = −0.64 e Å−3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes)
are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken
into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles
and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only
used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic)
treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s.
planes.
Authors: Aniello Palma; John F Gallagher; Helge Müller-Bunz; Joanna Wolowska; Eric J L McInnes; Donal F O'Shea Journal: Dalton Trans Date: 2008-11-05 Impact factor: 4.390