Literature DB >> 26594401

Crystal structure of (±)-(7RS,8SR)-7-methyl-1,4-dioxa-spiro-[4.5]decane-7,8-diol.

Takeshi Oishi1, Hiroaki Yamamoto2, Tomoya Sugai2, Keisuke Fukaya2, Yu Yamaguchi2, Ami Watanabe2, Takaaki Sato2, Noritaka Chida2.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C9H16O4, the five-membered dioxolane ring adopts a twist conformation; two adjacent C atoms deviate alternately from the mean plane of other atoms by -0.297 (4) and 0.288 (4) Å. The spiro-fused cyclo-hexane ring shows a chair form. The hy-droxy group substituted in an axial position makes an intra-molecular O-H⋯O hydrogen bond with one of the O atoms in the cyclic ether, forming an S(6) ring motif. In the crystal, the O-H⋯O hydrogen bond involving the equatorial hy-droxy group connects the mol-ecules into a zigzag chain with a C(5) motif running along the c axis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crystal structure; cyclo­hexa­ne; hydrogen bonds; hy­droxy groups; paclitaxel

Year:  2015        PMID: 26594401      PMCID: PMC4647432          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015016783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Paclitaxel (systematic name: (1S,2S,3R,4S,7R,9S,10S,12R,15S)-4,12-diacet­oxy-1,9-dihy­droxy-15-{[(2R,3S)-3-benzoylamino-2-hy­droxy-3-phen­yl]propano­yl}­oxy-10,14,17,17-tetramethyl-11-oxo-6-oxa­tetra­cyclo­[11.3.1.03,10.04,7]hepta­dec-13-en-2-yl benzoate) is a well-known natural diterpenoid with a potent anti­tumor activity (Wall & Wani, 1995 ▸). Its rather complicated structure and significant bioactivity have attracted chemical and medicinal inter­ests. While we recently reported several structures of the compounds (Oishi, Yamaguchi et al., 2015 ▸; Oishi, Fukaya et al., 2015a ▸,b ▸) obtained in the synthesis of paclitaxel (Fukaya, Tanaka et al., 2015 ▸; Fukaya, Kodama et al., 2015 ▸), the title compound has been prepared in an efficient synthetic approach to furnish the highly functionalized cyclo­hexane unit (Fukaya, Sugai et al., 2015 ▸). Although the title compound has been reported first with a different synthetic procedure, any stereochemical or conformational assignment was not mentioned (Li et al., 1981 ▸).

Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound is shown in Fig. 1 ▸. The dioxolane ring (O1/C2/C3/O4/C5) adopts a twist form with puckering parameters of Q(2) = 0.3523 (16) Å and φ(2) = 233.8 (3)°. Atoms C2 and C3 deviate from the mean plane of the other three atoms by −0.297 (4) and 0.288 (4) Å, respectively. The cyclo­hexane ring (C5–C10) adopts a chair form with puckering parameters of Q = 0.5560 (18) Å, θ = 3.32 (18)°, φ = 193 (3)°, Q(2) = 0.0323 (17) Å and Q(3) = 0.5551 (18) Å. The C5—O1, C7—C11 and C8—O13 bonds of equatorially oriented substituents make angles of 68.30 (9), 69.85 (9) and 75.76 (9)°, respectively, with the normal to the Cremer and Pople plane of the cyclo­hexane ring. The axially oriented hy­droxy group forms an intra­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bond (O12—H12⋯O4; Table 1 ▸), generating an S(6) graph-set motif. In this ring motif, five atoms (C5—O4⋯H12—O12—O7) are nearly coplanar with a maximum deviation of 0.012 (5) Å for atom O4.
Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound, showing the atom labels. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. The yellow dotted line indicates the intra­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bond. Only H atoms connected to O and chiral C atoms are shown for clarity.

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (, )

DHA DHHA D A DHA
O12H12O40.842.052.7838(16)146
O13H13O12i 0.841.992.8093(16)166
C6H6BO1ii 0.992.613.5631(19)162

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

Supra­molecular features

The crystal packing features an inter­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bond (O13—H13⋯O12i; Table 1 ▸) connecting enanti­omers related by a glide plane to form a chain structure with a C(5) graph-set motif running along the c axis (Fig. 2 ▸). An inter­molecular C—H⋯O inter­action (C6—H6B⋯O1ii; Table 1 ▸) with a slightly longer distance, leading to form a sheet parallel to (100), is also observed (Fig. 3 ▸).
Figure 2

A partial packing view showing the chain structure. Yellow lines indicate the intra­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. Purple dashed lines indicate the inter­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. Only H atoms involved in hydrogen bonds are shown for clarity. [Symmetry code: (i) x, −y + , z − .]

Figure 3

A packing diagram viewed down the c axis. Black dotted lines indicate the inter­molecular C—H⋯O inter­actions. Yellow lines and purple dashed lines indicate the intra- and inter­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, respectively. Only H atoms involved in hydrogen bonds are shown for clarity. [Symmetry code: (ii) −x, −y + 1, −z + 2.]

Database survey

In the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.36, November 2014; Groom & Allen, 2014 ▸), 266 structures containing a 7-methyl-1,4-dioxa­spiro­[4.5]decane skeleton, (a), are registered (Fig. 4 ▸). These include six compounds with 7,8-di­oxy-substituents. Two of them (JIQFIY and JIQGAR; Collins et al., 1998 ▸), synthesized from d-glucose, are closely related to the title compound [(b); racemic, P21/c], which are its 9,10-dimeth­oxy-8-O-methyl [(c); chiral, P212121] and 9,10-dimeth­oxy-6-phenyl-8-O-methyl [(d); chiral, P212121] derivatives. In the crystal structures of (c) and (d), the dioxolane rings adopt twist forms and the cyclo­hexane rings show chair forms. The intra­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bond is also observed in (c), but not in (d).
Figure 4

(a) 7-Methyl-1,4-dioxa­spiro­[4.5]decane; as the core structure for database survey, (b) the title compound, and its (c) 9,10-dimeth­oxy-8-O-methyl and (d) 9,10-dimeth­oxy-6-phenyl-8-O-methyl derivatives.

Synthesis and crystallization

The title compound was afforded in an improved synthetic approach of paclitaxel from 3-methyl­anisole (Fukaya, Sugai et al., 2015 ▸). Purification was carried out by silica gel column chromatography, and colorless crystals were obtained from an ethyl acetate solution by slow evaporation at ambient temperature. M.p. 359–360 K. HRMS (ESI) m/z calculated for C9H16O4Na+ [M + Na]+: 211.0946; found: 211.0936. Analysis calculated for C9H16O4: C 57.43, H 8.57%; found: C 57.51, H 8.50%. It is noted that the crystals grown from a diethyl ether solution under a pentane-saturated atmosphere were non-merohedral twins, and the structure is essentially the same as that reported here.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. C-bound H atoms were positioned geometrically with C—H = 0.98–1.00 Å, and constrained to ride on their parent atoms with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C) or 1.5U eq(methyl C). The hy­droxy H atoms were placed guided by difference maps, with O—H = 0.84 Å and with U iso(H) = 1.5U eq(O).
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC9H16O4
M r 188.22
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)90
a, b, c ()7.7403(5), 18.1498(11), 6.7335(5)
()103.281(2)
V (3)920.66(11)
Z 4
Radiation typeMo K
(mm1)0.11
Crystal size (mm)0.28 0.27 0.25
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker D8 Venture
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2014)
T min, T max 0.97, 0.97
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2(I)] reflections8165, 1612, 1205
R int 0.037
(sin /)max (1)0.595
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.036, 0.092, 1.01
No. of reflections1612
No. of parameters121
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
max, min (e 3)0.25, 0.27

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2014 ▸), SHELXS2013 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006 ▸), publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▸) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015016783/is5419sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015016783/is5419Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015016783/is5419Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 1422946 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C9H16O4Dx = 1.358 Mg m3
Mr = 188.22Melting point: 360.2 K
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.7403 (5) ÅCell parameters from 2733 reflections
b = 18.1498 (11) Åθ = 2.7–24.7°
c = 6.7335 (5) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
β = 103.281 (2)°T = 90 K
V = 920.66 (11) Å3Prism, colorless
Z = 40.28 × 0.27 × 0.25 mm
F(000) = 408
Bruker D8 Venture diffractometer1612 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1205 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Multilayered confocal mirror monochromatorRint = 0.037
Detector resolution: 10.4167 pixels mm-1θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.7°
φ and ω scansh = −9→8
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2014)k = −21→21
Tmin = 0.97, Tmax = 0.97l = −8→7
8165 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.092H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.01w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0407P)2 + 0.4103P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1612 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.008
121 parametersΔρmax = 0.25 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.27 e Å3
Experimental. IR (KBr) 3476, 3398, 2986, 2950, 2931, 2895, 1448, 1419, 1397, 1356, 1229, 1120, 1083, 1060, 1013, 952, 840, 696 cm-1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (p.p.m.) 4.02–3.91 (m, 4H), 3.73 (s, 1H), 3.33 (ddd, J = 10.7, 10.6, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 2.03 (d, J = 10.6 Hz, 1H), 1.94–1.86 (m, 2H), 1.78–1.56 (m, 4H), 1.25 (d, J = 0.9 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ (p.p.m.) 108.7 (C), 74.0 (CH), 72.5 (C), 64.7 (CH2), 64.4 (CH2), 44.1 (CH2), 33.2 (CH2), 28.4 (CH2), 26.2 (CH3).
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.Problematic one reflection with |I(obs)-I(calc)|/σW(I) greater than 10 (0 2 0) has been omitted in the final refinement.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.27151 (15)0.55328 (6)1.12431 (17)0.0191 (3)
C20.4342 (2)0.58896 (9)1.2186 (3)0.0209 (4)
H2A0.53260.57251.1580.025*
H2B0.46620.57961.36750.025*
C30.3914 (2)0.66886 (9)1.1734 (3)0.0204 (4)
H3A0.3270.69021.2710.025*
H3B0.50020.6981.17720.025*
O40.28135 (15)0.66576 (6)0.97209 (18)0.0177 (3)
C50.1875 (2)0.59633 (9)0.9519 (2)0.0154 (4)
C6−0.0045 (2)0.60871 (9)0.9585 (2)0.0139 (4)
H6A−0.00850.63651.08390.017*
H6B−0.06170.56030.96630.017*
C7−0.1103 (2)0.65073 (8)0.7741 (3)0.0139 (4)
C8−0.0926 (2)0.61203 (9)0.5774 (2)0.0141 (4)
H8−0.14270.56140.58040.017*
C90.1009 (2)0.60306 (9)0.5692 (3)0.0161 (4)
H9A0.15510.65230.56490.019*
H9B0.10790.57640.4430.019*
C100.2047 (2)0.56059 (9)0.7546 (3)0.0160 (4)
H10A0.15980.50940.74960.019*
H10B0.33150.55860.74990.019*
C11−0.3033 (2)0.65735 (10)0.7850 (3)0.0209 (4)
H11A−0.31080.68380.90970.031*
H11B−0.35440.6080.78680.031*
H11C−0.36920.68450.66580.031*
O12−0.04355 (15)0.72524 (6)0.77185 (18)0.0170 (3)
H120.06520.7260.8280.026*
O13−0.19319 (15)0.64738 (6)0.40008 (17)0.0179 (3)
H13−0.14460.68750.38250.027*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0174 (6)0.0186 (7)0.0174 (7)−0.0029 (5)−0.0040 (5)0.0046 (5)
C20.0167 (9)0.0220 (10)0.0206 (10)−0.0018 (8)−0.0024 (7)−0.0001 (8)
C30.0197 (10)0.0203 (10)0.0186 (10)−0.0022 (8)−0.0012 (8)−0.0022 (8)
O40.0167 (6)0.0158 (6)0.0178 (7)−0.0057 (5)−0.0021 (5)0.0019 (5)
C50.0157 (9)0.0124 (8)0.0162 (9)−0.0029 (7)−0.0001 (7)0.0041 (7)
C60.0165 (9)0.0130 (9)0.0130 (9)−0.0021 (7)0.0048 (7)−0.0011 (7)
C70.0154 (9)0.0099 (8)0.0166 (10)−0.0008 (7)0.0042 (7)0.0003 (7)
C80.0160 (9)0.0114 (9)0.0132 (9)−0.0010 (7)−0.0002 (7)0.0010 (7)
C90.0178 (9)0.0162 (9)0.0147 (9)−0.0001 (7)0.0045 (7)−0.0020 (7)
C100.0135 (9)0.0164 (9)0.0188 (10)0.0001 (7)0.0051 (7)−0.0005 (7)
C110.0181 (9)0.0223 (10)0.0233 (10)0.0017 (8)0.0071 (8)0.0005 (8)
O120.0176 (6)0.0129 (6)0.0195 (7)−0.0011 (5)0.0021 (5)−0.0007 (5)
O130.0192 (7)0.0171 (6)0.0145 (7)−0.0021 (5)−0.0019 (5)0.0036 (5)
O1—C51.4265 (19)C7—C111.517 (2)
O1—C21.428 (2)C7—C81.532 (2)
C2—C31.503 (2)C8—O131.4200 (19)
C2—H2A0.99C8—C91.520 (2)
C2—H2B0.99C8—H81.0
C3—O41.427 (2)C9—C101.529 (2)
C3—H3A0.99C9—H9A0.99
C3—H3B0.99C9—H9B0.99
O4—C51.4453 (19)C10—H10A0.99
C5—C101.512 (2)C10—H10B0.99
C5—C61.514 (2)C11—H11A0.98
C6—C71.526 (2)C11—H11B0.98
C6—H6A0.99C11—H11C0.98
C6—H6B0.99O12—H120.84
C7—O121.4491 (19)O13—H130.84
C5—O1—C2107.70 (12)O12—C7—C8108.41 (13)
O1—C2—C3102.52 (13)C11—C7—C8111.28 (14)
O1—C2—H2A111.3C6—C7—C8109.66 (13)
C3—C2—H2A111.3O13—C8—C9111.85 (13)
O1—C2—H2B111.3O13—C8—C7112.27 (13)
C3—C2—H2B111.3C9—C8—C7111.41 (13)
H2A—C2—H2B109.2O13—C8—H8107.0
O4—C3—C2102.13 (13)C9—C8—H8107.0
O4—C3—H3A111.3C7—C8—H8107.0
C2—C3—H3A111.3C8—C9—C10111.21 (14)
O4—C3—H3B111.3C8—C9—H9A109.4
C2—C3—H3B111.3C10—C9—H9A109.4
H3A—C3—H3B109.2C8—C9—H9B109.4
C3—O4—C5107.54 (12)C10—C9—H9B109.4
O1—C5—O4105.99 (12)H9A—C9—H9B108.0
O1—C5—C10111.37 (13)C5—C10—C9111.42 (13)
O4—C5—C10108.24 (13)C5—C10—H10A109.3
O1—C5—C6108.93 (13)C9—C10—H10A109.3
O4—C5—C6110.10 (13)C5—C10—H10B109.3
C10—C5—C6112.02 (13)C9—C10—H10B109.3
C5—C6—C7113.40 (13)H10A—C10—H10B108.0
C5—C6—H6A108.9C7—C11—H11A109.5
C7—C6—H6A108.9C7—C11—H11B109.5
C5—C6—H6B108.9H11A—C11—H11B109.5
C7—C6—H6B108.9C7—C11—H11C109.5
H6A—C6—H6B107.7H11A—C11—H11C109.5
O12—C7—C11106.50 (13)H11B—C11—H11C109.5
O12—C7—C6110.42 (13)C7—O12—H12109.5
C11—C7—C6110.50 (14)C8—O13—H13109.5
C5—O1—C2—C330.97 (17)C5—C6—C7—C853.80 (17)
O1—C2—C3—O4−37.36 (16)O12—C7—C8—O13−61.28 (17)
C2—C3—O4—C530.55 (17)C11—C7—C8—O1355.53 (17)
C2—O1—C5—O4−12.62 (16)C6—C7—C8—O13178.10 (12)
C2—O1—C5—C10104.89 (15)O12—C7—C8—C965.06 (16)
C2—O1—C5—C6−131.06 (14)C11—C7—C8—C9−178.13 (13)
C3—O4—C5—O1−12.23 (16)C6—C7—C8—C9−55.56 (17)
C3—O4—C5—C10−131.81 (14)O13—C8—C9—C10−176.36 (12)
C3—O4—C5—C6105.44 (15)C7—C8—C9—C1057.07 (18)
O1—C5—C6—C7−176.78 (12)O1—C5—C10—C9174.98 (12)
O4—C5—C6—C767.39 (16)O4—C5—C10—C9−68.89 (16)
C10—C5—C6—C7−53.12 (18)C6—C5—C10—C952.69 (18)
C5—C6—C7—O12−65.60 (17)C8—C9—C10—C5−55.09 (18)
C5—C6—C7—C11176.83 (13)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O12—H12···O40.842.052.7838 (16)146
O13—H13···O12i0.841.992.8093 (16)166
C6—H6B···O1ii0.992.613.5631 (19)162
  6 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  The Cambridge Structural Database in retrospect and prospect.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Frank H Allen
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  Synthesis of Paclitaxel. 1. Synthesis of the ABC Ring of Paclitaxel by SmI2-Mediated Cyclization.

Authors:  Keisuke Fukaya; Yuta Tanaka; Ayako C Sato; Keisuke Kodama; Hirohisa Yamazaki; Takeru Ishimoto; Yasuyoshi Nozaki; Yuki M Iwaki; Yohei Yuki; Kentaro Umei; Tomoya Sugai; Yu Yamaguchi; Ami Watanabe; Takeshi Oishi; Takaaki Sato; Noritaka Chida
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 6.005

4.  Synthesis of Paclitaxel. 2. Construction of the ABCD Ring and Formal Synthesis.

Authors:  Keisuke Fukaya; Keisuke Kodama; Yuta Tanaka; Hirohisa Yamazaki; Tomoya Sugai; Yu Yamaguchi; Ami Watanabe; Takeshi Oishi; Takaaki Sato; Noritaka Chida
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 6.005

5.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

6.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.