Literature DB >> 26593970

Comparing variation in hospital rates of cesarean delivery among low-risk women using 3 different measures.

Joanne C Armstrong1, Katy B Kozhimannil2, Patricia McDermott3, George R Saade4, Sindhu K Srinivas5.   

Abstract

This report describes the development of a measure of low-risk cesarean delivery by the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). Safely lowering the cesarean delivery rate is a priority for maternity care clinicians and health care delivery systems. Therefore, hospital quality assurance programs are increasingly tracking cesarean delivery rates among low-risk pregnancies. Two commonly used definitions of "low risk" are available, the Joint Commission (JC) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) measures, but these measures are not clinically comprehensive. We sought to refine the definition of the low-risk cesarean delivery rate to enhance the validity of the metric for quality measurement. We created this refined definition-called the SMFM definition-and compared it to the JC and AHRQ measures using claims-based data from the 2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample of >863,000 births in 612 hospitals. Using these definitions, we calculated means and interquartile ranges (25th-75th percentile range) for hospital low-risk cesarean delivery rates, stratified by hospital size, teaching status, urban/rural location, and payer mix. Across all hospitals, the mean low-risk cesarean delivery rate was lowest for the SMFM definition (12.65%), but not substantially different from the JC and AHRQ measures (13.12% and 13.29%, respectively). We empirically examined the SMFM definition to ensure its validity and utility. This refined definition performs similarly to existing measures and has the added advantage of clinical perspective, enhanced face validity, and ease of use.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine; cesarean delivery rate variation; hospital variation; low-risk cesarean delivery rate; quality measurement

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26593970     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  9 in total

1.  Hospital volume and cesarean delivery among low-risk women in a nationwide sample.

Authors:  M A Clapp; K E James; A Melamed; J L Ecker; A J Kaimal
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Development and testing of a survey measure of organizational perinatal patient-centered care culture.

Authors:  Sara C Handley; Molly Passarella; Ashley E Martin; Scott A Lorch; Sindhu K Srinivas; Ingrid M Nembhard
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.734

3.  Impact of Statewide Mandatory Medicaid Managed Care (SMMC) Programs on Hospital Obstetric Outcomes.

Authors:  Hasan Symum; José Zayas-Castro
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-09

4.  Hospitalization Duration Following Uncomplicated Cesarean Delivery: Predictors, Facility Variation, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Jerome J Federspiel; Sunitha C Suresh; Kristin C Darwin; Linda M Szymanski
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2020-06-19

5.  Evaluation of Hospital Cesarean Delivery-Related Profits and Rates in the United States.

Authors:  Rie Sakai-Bizmark; Michael G Ross; Dennys Estevez; Lauren E M Bedel; Emily H Marr; Yusuke Tsugawa
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-03-01

6.  Birth Volume and Geographic Distribution of US Hospitals With Obstetric Services From 2010 to 2018.

Authors:  Sara C Handley; Molly Passarella; Heidi M Herrick; Julia D Interrante; Scott A Lorch; Katy B Kozhimannil; Ciaran S Phibbs; Elizabeth E Foglia
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-10-01

7.  Hospital Admission in the Latent versus the Active Phase of Labor: Comparison of Perinatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Viola Seravalli; Noemi Strambi; Enrica Castellana; Maria Alessia Salamina; Chiara Bettini; Mariarosaria Di Tommaso
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-20

8.  Spontaneous vaginal birth varies significantly across US hospitals.

Authors:  Rebecca R S Clark; Eileen T Lake
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.689

9.  Patient and Hospital Factors Associated With Unexpected Newborn Complications Among Term Neonates in US Hospitals.

Authors:  Mark A Clapp; Kaitlyn E James; Sara V Bates; Anjali J Kaimal
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-02-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.