Literature DB >> 10521867

Evaluating the exposure and disease relationship with adjustment for different types of exposure misclassification: a regression approach.

A S Kosinski1, W D Flanders.   

Abstract

Misclassification of exposure can lead to biased results in the epidemiologic research. Available methods accounting for misclassification often require the use of a gold standard or assume non-differential misclassification of exposure. We present a regression approach which can detect and account for different types of misclassification when estimating the exposure and disease relationship. This approach uses two imperfect measures of a dichotomous exposure and does not require a gold standard. Standard statistical packages with a logistic regression module can be used for estimation of parameters through the EM algorithm process. Two examples are used to illustrate the methodology. Copyright 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10521867     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19991030)18:20<2795::aid-sim192>3.0.co;2-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  6 in total

1.  Binomial regression with a misclassified covariate and outcome.

Authors:  Sheng Luo; Wenyaw Chan; Michelle A Detry; Paul J Massman; Rachelle S Doody
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Expected estimating equations via EM for proportional hazards regression with covariate misclassification.

Authors:  Ching-Yun Wang; Xiao Song
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  STRATOS guidance document on measurement error and misclassification of variables in observational epidemiology: Part 2-More complex methods of adjustment and advanced topics.

Authors:  Pamela A Shaw; Paul Gustafson; Raymond J Carroll; Veronika Deffner; Kevin W Dodd; Ruth H Keogh; Victor Kipnis; Janet A Tooze; Michael P Wallace; Helmut Küchenhoff; Laurence S Freedman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Methods to adjust for misclassification in the quantiles for the generalized linear model with measurement error in continuous exposures.

Authors:  Ching-Yun Wang; Jean De Dieu Tapsoba; Catherine Duggan; Kristin L Campbell; Anne McTiernan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 5.  Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.

Authors:  John Collins; Minh Huynh
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Use of latent class models to accommodate inter-laboratory variation in assessing genetic polymorphisms associated with disease risk.

Authors:  Stephen D Walter; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 2.797

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.