Literature DB >> 26593739

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients with Myocardial Infarction, Myocardial Injury, and Nonelevated Troponins.

Laura Sarkisian1, Lotte Saaby1, Tina S Poulsen1, Oke Gerke2, Nikolaj Jangaard1, Susanne Hosbond1, Axel C P Diederichsen1, Kristian Thygesen3, Hans Mickley4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac troponins have emerged as the preferred biomarkers for detecting myocardial necrosis and diagnosing myocardial infarction. However, current cardiac troponin assays do not discriminate between ischemic and nonischemic causes of myocardial cell death. Thus, when an increased troponin value is encountered in the absence of obvious myocardial ischemia, a careful search for other clinical conditions is crucial.
METHODS: In 2010 to 2011, we prospectively studied hospitalized patients who had cardiac troponin I measured on clinical indication. An acute myocardial infarction was diagnosed in cases of a cardiac troponin I increase or decrease pattern with at least 1 value >30 ng/L (99th percentile) together with myocardial ischemia. Myocardial injury was defined as cardiac troponin I values >30 ng/L, but without signs or symptoms indicating overt cardiac ischemia. Patients with peak values ≤30 ng/L were classified as nonelevated cardiac troponin I. Follow-up was at least 3 years with all-cause mortality as the sole clinical end point.
RESULTS: A total of 3762 patients were included. Of these, 488 (13%) had acute myocardial infarction, 1089 (29%) had myocardial injury, and 2185 (58%) had nonelevated cardiac troponin I values. Patients with myocardial injury frequently presented with dyspnea, were older, and had more comorbidity than patients in the 2 other groups. During a median follow-up of 3.2 years, 1342 patients died. Mortality differed significantly between groups: 39% in those with myocardial infarction, 59% in those with myocardial injury, and 23% in those with nonelevated cardiac troponin I (log-rank test; P < .0001). No significant difference in mortality between patients with type 2 myocardial infarction and patients with myocardial injury was observed (63% and 59%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with myocardial injury are older and have more comorbidity than those with acute myocardial infarction. Both groups exhibit a poorer prognosis than patients with nonelevated cardiac troponin I values. Of note, a very high long-term mortality is observed in patients with type 2 myocardial infarction and patients with myocardial injury.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Myocardial infarction; Myocardial injury; Prognosis; Troponins; Type 2 myocardial infarction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26593739     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  34 in total

1.  Use of the HEART Pathway with high sensitivity cardiac troponins: A secondary analysis.

Authors:  Simon A Mahler; Jason P Stopyra; Fred S Apple; Robert F Riley; Gregory B Russell; Brian C Hiestand; James W Hoekstra; Cedric W Lefebvre; Bret A Nicks; David M Cline; Kim L Askew; David M Herrington; Gregory L Burke; Chadwick D Miller
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.281

2.  Troponin Release and Reversible Left Ventricular Dysfunction After Transient Pressure Overload.

Authors:  Brian R Weil; Gen Suzuki; Rebeccah F Young; Vijay Iyer; John M Canty
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Higher non-cardiac mortality and lesser impact of early revascularization in patients with type 2 compared to type 1 acute myocardial infarction: results from the Tokyo CCU Network registry.

Authors:  Satoshi Higuchi; Makoto Suzuki; Yu Horiuchi; Hiroyuki Tanaka; Mike Saji; Hideaki Yoshino; Ken Nagao; Takeshi Yamamoto; Morimasa Takayama
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 4.  Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: Evolving Approaches to Diagnosis and Risk-Stratification.

Authors:  Andrew R Chapman; Yader Sandoval
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Mortality in sepsis: Comparison of outcomes between patients with demand ischemia, acute myocardial infarction, and neither demand ischemia nor acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Mahek Shah; Soumya Patnaik; Obiora Maludum; Brijesh Patel; Byomesh Tripathi; Manyoo Agarwal; Lohit Garg; Sahil Agrawal; Ulrich P Jorde; Matthew W Martinez
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program.

Authors:  Cian P McCarthy; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Avinainder Singh; Zirui Song; Ron Blankstein; Hanna K Gaggin; Jason H Wasfy; James L Januzzi
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin and the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Andrew R Chapman; Philip D Adamson; Anoop S V Shah; Atul Anand; Fiona E Strachan; Amy V Ferry; Kuan Ken Lee; Colin Berry; Iain Findlay; Anne Cruikshank; Alan Reid; Alasdair Gray; Paul O Collinson; Fred Apple; David A McAllister; Donogh Maguire; Keith A A Fox; Catalina A Vallejos; Catriona Keerie; Christopher J Weir; David E Newby; Nicholas L Mills
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Diagnosis, Investigation and Management of Patients with Acute and Chronic Myocardial Injury.

Authors:  Caelan Taggart; Ryan Wereski; Nicholas L Mills; Andrew R Chapman
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Myocardial Injury After Temporary Transvenous Cardiac Pacing.

Authors:  Meng Liu; Pingsheng Wu
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Performance of the GRACE 2.0 score in patients with type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction.

Authors:  John Hung; Andreas Roos; Erik Kadesjö; David A McAllister; Dorien M Kimenai; Anoop S V Shah; Atul Anand; Fiona E Strachan; Keith A A Fox; Nicholas L Mills; Andrew R Chapman; Martin J Holzmann
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 35.855

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.