Seungmi Yang1, Jennifer A Hutcheon2. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal Canada. Electronic address: seungmi.yang@mcgill.ca. 2. Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To illustrate how conditional growth percentiles can be adapted for use to systematically identify implausible measurements in growth trajectory data. METHODS: The use of conditional growth percentiles as a tool to assess serial weight data was reviewed. The approach was applied to 86,427 weight measurements (kg) taken between birth and age 6.5 years in 8217 girls participating in the Promotion of Breast Feeding Intervention Trial in Belarus. A conditional mean and variance was calculated for each weight measurement, which reflects the expected weight at a current visit given the girl's previous weights. Measurements were flagged as outliers if they were more than 4 standard deviation (SD) above or below the expected (conditional) weight. RESULTS: The method identified 234 weight measurements (0.3%) from 216 girls as potential outliers. Review of these trajectories confirmed the implausibility of the flagged measurements, and that the approach identified observations that would not have been identified using a conventional cross-sectional approach (± 4 SD of the population mean) for identifying implausible values. Stata code to implement the approach is provided. CONCLUSIONS: Conditional growth percentiles can be used to systematically identify implausible values in growth trajectory data and may be particularly useful for large data sets where the high number of trajectories makes ad hoc approaches unfeasible.
PURPOSE: To illustrate how conditional growth percentiles can be adapted for use to systematically identify implausible measurements in growth trajectory data. METHODS: The use of conditional growth percentiles as a tool to assess serial weight data was reviewed. The approach was applied to 86,427 weight measurements (kg) taken between birth and age 6.5 years in 8217 girls participating in the Promotion of Breast Feeding Intervention Trial in Belarus. A conditional mean and variance was calculated for each weight measurement, which reflects the expected weight at a current visit given the girl's previous weights. Measurements were flagged as outliers if they were more than 4 standard deviation (SD) above or below the expected (conditional) weight. RESULTS: The method identified 234 weight measurements (0.3%) from 216 girls as potential outliers. Review of these trajectories confirmed the implausibility of the flagged measurements, and that the approach identified observations that would not have been identified using a conventional cross-sectional approach (± 4 SD of the population mean) for identifying implausible values. Stata code to implement the approach is provided. CONCLUSIONS: Conditional growth percentiles can be used to systematically identify implausible values in growth trajectory data and may be particularly useful for large data sets where the high number of trajectories makes ad hoc approaches unfeasible.
Authors: Jennifer A Hutcheon; Robert W Platt; Barbara Abrams; Katherine P Himes; Hyagriv N Simhan; Lisa M Bodnar Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: M S Kramer; B Chalmers; E D Hodnett; Z Sevkovskaya; I Dzikovich; S Shapiro; J P Collet; I Vanilovich; I Mezen; T Ducruet; G Shishko; V Zubovich; D Mknuik; E Gluchanina; V Dombrovskiy; A Ustinovitch; T Kot; N Bogdanovich; L Ovchinikova; E Helsing Journal: JAMA Date: 2001 Jan 24-31 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Seungmi Yang; Kate Tilling; Richard Martin; Neil Davies; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Michael S Kramer Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2011-07-15 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Jennifer A Hutcheon; Grace M Egeland; Lucie Morin; Sara J Meltzer; Geir Jacobsen; Robert W Platt Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: Stephanie A Richard; Benjamin J J McCormick; Mark A Miller; Laura E Caulfield; William Checkley Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-11-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Pamela J Surkan; Anna K Ettinger; Rebecca S Hock; Saifuddin Ahmed; Donna M Strobino; Cynthia S Minkovitz Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2014-07-21 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Carrie Daymont; Michelle E Ross; A Russell Localio; Alexander G Fiks; Richard C Wasserman; Robert W Grundmeier Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Michelle C Dimitris; Jennifer A Hutcheon; Robert W Platt; Katherine P Himes; Lisa M Bodnar; Jay S Kaufman Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2021-04-22 Impact factor: 6.996