Literature DB >> 26589826

Growing degree hours - a simple, accurate, and precise protocol to approximate growing heat summation for grapevines.

S Gu1.   

Abstract

Despite its low accuracy and consistency, growing degree days (GDD) has been widely used to approximate growing heat summation (GHS) for regional classification and phenological prediction. GDD is usually calculated from the mean of daily minimum and maximum temperatures (GDDmm) above a growing base temperature (T gb). To determine approximation errors and accuracy, daily and cumulative GDDmm was compared to GDD based on daily average temperature (GDDavg), growing degree hours (GDH) based on hourly temperatures, and growing degree minutes (GDM) based on minute-by-minute temperatures. Finite error, due to the difference between measured and true temperatures above T gb is large in GDDmm but is negligible in GDDavg, GDH, and GDM, depending only upon the number of measured temperatures used for daily approximation. Hidden negative error, due to the temperatures below T gb when being averaged for approximation intervals larger than measuring interval, is large in GDDmm and GDDavg but is negligible in GDH and GDM. Both GDH and GDM improve GHS approximation accuracy over GDDmm or GDDavg by summation of multiple integration rectangles to reduce both finite and hidden negative errors. GDH is proposed as the standardized GHS approximation protocol, providing adequate accuracy and high precision independent upon T gb while requiring simple data recording and processing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Finite error; GDD; GDH; Hidden negative error; Rectangular integration

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26589826     DOI: 10.1007/s00484-015-1105-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biometeorol        ISSN: 0020-7128            Impact factor:   3.787


  3 in total

1.  An improved model for determining degree-day values from daily temperature data.

Authors:  C Cesaraccio; D Spano; P Duce; R L Snyder
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Grapevine bud break prediction for cool winter climates.

Authors:  Claas Nendel
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 3.787

3.  Growing degree-days for the 'Niagara Rosada' grapevine pruned in different seasons.

Authors:  Fábio Vale Scarpare; João Alexio Scarpare Filho; Alessandro Rodrigues; Klaus Reichardt; Luiz Roberto Angelocci
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 3.787

  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  Assessing multi-risk characteristics of heat and cold stress for rice across the southern parts of China.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Bingyun Yang; Sen Li; Dapeng Huang; Zhiguo Huo
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Effect of weather conditions, substrate pH, biochar amendment and plant species on two plant growth-promoting microbes on vegetated roofs and facades.

Authors:  Long Xie; Sari Timonen; Alan C Gange; Kirsi Kuoppamäki; Marleena Hagner; Susanna Lehvävirta
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  Towards a Stochastic Model to Simulate Grapevine Architecture: A Case Study on Digitized Riesling Vines Considering Effects of Elevated CO2.

Authors:  Dominik Schmidt; Katrin Kahlen; Christopher Bahr; Matthias Friedel
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17

4.  Assessment of Climate Change Impacts on Chilling and Forcing for the Main Fresh Fruit Regions in Portugal.

Authors:  Helder Fraga; João A Santos
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Generic calibration of a simple model of diurnal temperature variations for spatial analysis of accumulated degree-days.

Authors:  Raphael Felber; Sibylle Stoeckli; Pierluigi Calanca
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.787

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.