Literature DB >> 26589655

Communicating efficacy information based on composite scores in direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising.

Pamela A Williams1, Amie C O'Donoghue2, Helen W Sullivan2, Jessica Fitts Willoughby3, Claudia Squire4, Sarah Parvanta4, Kevin R Betts2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Drug efficacy can be measured by composite scores, which consist of two or more symptoms or other clinical components of a disease. We evaluated how individuals interpret composite scores in direct-to-consumer (DTC) prescription drug advertising.
METHODS: We conducted an experimental study of seasonal allergy sufferers (n=1967) who viewed a fictitious print DTC ad that varied by the type of information featured (general indication, list of symptoms, or definition of composite scores) and the presence or absence of an educational intervention about composite scores. We measured composite score recognition and comprehension, and perceived drug efficacy and risk.
RESULTS: Ads that featured either (1) the composite score definition alone or (2) the list of symptoms or general indication information along with the educational intervention improved composite score comprehension. Ads that included the composite score definition or the educational intervention led to lower confidence in the drug's benefits. The composite score definition improved composite score recognition and lowered drug risk perceptions.
CONCLUSION: Adding composite score information to DTC print ads may improve individuals' comprehension of composite scores and affect their perceptions of the drug. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Providing composite score information may lead to more informed patient-provider prescription drug decisions.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Communication; Composite scores; Direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertisements; Marketing; Prescription drugs; United States

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26589655      PMCID: PMC8827128          DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  16 in total

1.  The effect of numerical statements of risk on trust and comfort with hypothetical physician risk communication.

Authors:  Andrea D Gurmankin; Jonathan Baron; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 2.  A historical perspective of elevated systolic vs diastolic blood pressure from an epidemiological and clinical trial viewpoint.

Authors:  G H Rutan; R H McDonald; L H Kuller
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Randomized study of placebo and framing information in direct-to-consumer print advertisements for prescription drugs.

Authors:  Amie C O'Donoghue; Helen W Sullivan; Kathryn J Aikin
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2014-12

4.  A content analysis of direct-to-consumer television prescription drug advertisements.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kaphingst; William DeJong; Rima E Rudd; Lawren H Daltroy
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec

5.  Television advertisement format and the provision of risk information about prescription drug products.

Authors:  Lewis H Glinert; Jon C Schommer
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2005-06

6.  Creating demand for prescription drugs: a content analysis of television direct-to-consumer advertising.

Authors:  Dominick L Frosch; Patrick M Krueger; Robert C Hornik; Peter F Cronholm; Frances K Barg
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  The Food and Drug Administration has the legal basis to restrict promotion of flawed comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Aaron S Kesselheim; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising, 1989-1998. A content analysis of conditions, targets, inducements, and appeals.

Authors:  R A Bell; R L Kravitz; M S Wilkes
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 0.493

Review 9.  Direct marketing of pharmaceuticals to consumers.

Authors:  Alan Lyles
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 21.981

10.  Presenting efficacy information in direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertisements.

Authors:  Amie C O'Donoghue; Helen W Sullivan; Kathryn J Aikin; Dhuly Chowdhury; Rebecca R Moultrie; Douglas J Rupert
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-12-25
View more
  4 in total

1.  Consumers' Understanding of FDA Approval Requirements and Composite Scores in Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Print Ads.

Authors:  Amie C O'Donoghue; Helen W Sullivan; Pamela A Williams; Claudia Squire; Kevin R Betts; Jessica Fitts Willoughby; Sarah Parvanta
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2016-07-14

2.  The risk-value trade-off: price and brand information impact consumers' intentions to purchase OTC drugs.

Authors:  Lisa Aufegger; Celine Yanar; Ara Darzi; Colin Bicknell
Journal:  J Pharm Policy Pract       Date:  2021-01-25

3.  A survey of perceptions and attitudes about direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs among college students in South Korea.

Authors:  Young-Mo Yang; Jae-Joon Lee; Eun Jeong; Sun Young Kim; Mi Ah Han; Eun Joo Choi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The FDA's Diverse and Dynamic Activities in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: Advancing and Supporting Health Equity.

Authors:  Christine Lee; Melanie J McLean; Caroline J Huang; Anh Nguyen Zarndt; Kathryn J Aikin; Paula Rausch; Barbara R Cohen; Janine Delahanty; Danielle M Sholly; Wendy I Slavit; Ewa D Carlton
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.