| Literature DB >> 26588092 |
Johanna A Bac-Molenaar1,2, Emilie F Fradin1,2, Juriaan A Rienstra1, Dick Vreugdenhil1, Joost J B Keurentjes2.
Abstract
Induction ofEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26588092 PMCID: PMC4654576 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143212
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Natural variation in anthocyanin accumulation.
A) Representative examples of categories of anthocyanin accumulation. Anthocyanin accumulation was scored visually by assigning each individual plant to an accumulation category. B) Geographical distribution of the accessions in Europe. The color indicates the anthocyanin accumulation category in stress conditions.
Fig 2Linear correlation between accumulation category assigned to plants by visual scoring and anthocyanin content quantified spectrophotometrically.
Fig 3Frequency distribution over the scoring categories.
In total 2160 plants were scored, three replicates of each of the 360 accessions in control and in PEG treated conditions. A) Frequency distribution based on number of plants. B) Frequency distribution based on number of accessions.
Fig 4Manhattan plots of GWA mapping for anthocyanin accumulation under control (A) and stress conditions (B).
A Bonferroni-corrected threshold of α = 0.05 is represented by the dashed line. Each dot represents a SNP and different colors indicate the five chromosomes of Arabidopsis. (C) Blow-up of the region around the significantly associated SNPs. All genes positioned in the region are represented by arrows (red color: genes known to play a role in anthocyanin accumulation).
Fig 5Relative expression of 4 MYB-transcription factors and CML23, AT1G44600, a calmodulin-like gene, in control and PEG-treated plants.
For each gene, the values are relative to the average and are normalized using the expression of two reference genes. Error bars represent standard deviations. Accessions are ordered from low to high anthocyanin accumulation upon osmotic stress. Details can be found in S1 Data.
Statistics of the sequence diversity of MYB75, MYB113 and MYB114, MYB90 and results of tests for deviations from neutrality of selection of Tajima [30] and Fu and Li [31].
| SNPs | Fu and Li | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gene | mutations | syn | non-syn | Tajima's D | D* | F* | # of alleles |
| MYB75 | 36 | 13 | 21 | -1.32 | -2.00& | -2.02& | 15 |
| MYB113 | 41 | 13 | 25 | -2.05* | -3.16* | -3.00* | 19 |
| MYB114 | 27 | 4 | 22 | -1.18 | -2.17& | -2.23& | 18 |
| MYB90 | 10 | 6 | 4 | -1.14 | -6.94* | -5.96* | 5 |
SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism; mutation: this number deviates from the number of SNPs if at one position more than two different nucleotides are observed; syn = synonymous, non-syn = non-synonymous. Significance is indicated by * (α = 0.05) and & (α = 0.10).
Fig 6Genotypic and phenotypic differences between alleles of MYB90.
A) Positions of non-synonymous SNPs and corresponding amino acid changes defining the alleles. Number of accessions carrying the allele are indicated above the double line. B) Anthocyanin accumulation per allele (mean +/- SD). Means per allele are compared by ANOVA following pairwise comparison using Bonferroni corrected significance threshold of α = 0.05. Letters above the bars indicate significant differences.