Literature DB >> 26588020

Is T1ρ Mapping an Alternative to Delayed Gadolinium-enhanced MR Imaging of Cartilage in the Assessment of Sulphated Glycosaminoglycan Content in Human Osteoarthritic Knees? An in Vivo Validation Study.

Jasper van Tiel1, Gyula Kotek1, Max Reijman1, Pieter K Bos1, Esther E Bron1, Stefan Klein1, Kazem Nasserinejad1, Gerjo J V M van Osch1, Jan A N Verhaar1, Gabriel P Krestin1, Harrie Weinans1, Edwin H G Oei1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if T1ρ mapping can be used as an alternative to delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) in the quantification of cartilage biochemical composition in vivo in human knees with osteoarthritis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional review board. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Twelve patients with knee osteoarthritis underwent dGEMRIC and T1ρ mapping at 3.0 T before undergoing total knee replacement. Outcomes of dGEMRIC and T1ρ mapping were calculated in six cartilage regions of interest. Femoral and tibial cartilages were harvested during total knee replacement. Cartilage sulphated glycosaminoglycan (sGAG) and collagen content were assessed with dimethylmethylene blue and hydroxyproline assays, respectively. A four-dimensional multivariate mixed-effects model was used to simultaneously assess the correlation between outcomes of dGEMRIC and T1ρ mapping and the sGAG and collagen content of the articular cartilage.
RESULTS: T1 relaxation times at dGEMRIC showed strong correlation with cartilage sGAG content (r = 0.73; 95% credibility interval [CI] = 0.60, 0.83) and weak correlation with cartilage collagen content (r = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.58). T1ρ relaxation times did not correlate with cartilage sGAG content (r = 0.04; 95% CI: -0.21, 0.28) or collagen content (r = -0.05; 95% CI = -0.31, 0.20).
CONCLUSION: dGEMRIC can help accurately measure cartilage sGAG content in vivo in patients with knee osteoarthritis, whereas T1ρ mapping does not appear suitable for this purpose. Although the technique is not completely sGAG specific and requires a contrast agent, dGEMRIC is a validated and robust method for quantifying cartilage sGAG content in human osteoarthritis subjects in clinical research. (©) RSNA, 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26588020     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015150693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  26 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative techniques for musculoskeletal MRI at 7 Tesla.

Authors:  Neal K Bangerter; Meredith D Taylor; Grayson J Tarbox; Antony J Palmer; Daniel J Park
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-12

Review 2.  Imaging of osteoarthritis-recent research developments and future perspective.

Authors:  Daichi Hayashi; Frank W Roemer; Ali Guermazi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  The value of MR T2* measurements in normal and osteoarthritic knee cartilage: effects of age, sex, and location.

Authors:  Ping-Huei Tsai; Chin-Chean Wong; Wing P Chan; Tung-Wu Lu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  A unique anisotropic R2 of collagen degeneration (ARCADE) mapping as an efficient alternative to composite relaxation metric (R2 -R1 ρ ) in human knee cartilage study.

Authors:  Yuxi Pang; Riann M Palmieri-Smith; Dariya I Malyarenko; Scott D Swanson; Thomas L Chenevert
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  [Chondral and osteochondral defects : Representation by imaging methods].

Authors:  S Nebelung; B Rath; M Tingart; C Kuhl; S Schrading
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Associations of three-dimensional T1 rho MR mapping and three-dimensional T2 mapping with macroscopic and histologic grading as a biomarker for early articular degeneration of knee cartilage.

Authors:  T Sasho; J Katsuragi; S Yamaguchi; H Haneishi; T Aizimu; T Tanaka; A Watanabe; Y Sato; R Akagi; K Matsumoto; T Uno; K Motoori
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 7.  [Advanced cartilage imaging for detection of cartilage injuries and osteochondral lesions].

Authors:  A S Gersing; B J Schwaiger; K Wörtler; P M Jungmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis with Bone Marrow-Derived Mononuclear Cell Injection: 12-Month Follow-up.

Authors:  Valdis Goncars; Konstantins Kalnberzs; Eriks Jakobsons; Ilze Enģele; Ieva Briede; Kristaps Blums; Kristaps Erglis; Martins Erglis; Liene Patetko; Indrikis Muiznieks; Andrejs Erglis
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Quantitative ultrashort echo time magnetization transfer (UTE-MT) for diagnosis of early cartilage degeneration: comparison with UTE-T2* and T2 mapping.

Authors:  Jiawei Yang; Hongda Shao; Yajun Ma; Lidi Wan; Yixuan Zhang; Junjie Jiang; Jiang Du; Guangyu Tang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-01

10.  Bi-component T2 mapping correlates with articular cartilage material properties.

Authors:  Matthew M Grondin; Fang Liu; Michael F Vignos; Alexey Samsonov; Wan-Ju Li; Richard Kijowski; Corinne R Henak
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.