| Literature DB >> 26587121 |
Naouar Ouattassi1, Najib Benmansour1, Mohammed Ridal1, Zouheir Zaki1, Karima Bendahhou2, Chakib Nejjari2, Abdeljabbar Cherkaoui3, Mohammed Nouredine El Amine El Alami1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Acoustic evaluation of alaryngeal voices is among the most prominent issues in speech analysis field. In fact, many methods have been developed to date to substitute the classic perceptual evaluation. The Aim of this study is to present our experience in erygmophonic speech objective assessment and to discuss the most widely used methods of acoustic speech appraisal. through a prospective case-control study we have measured acoustic parameters of speech quality during one year of erygmophonic rehabilitation therapy of Moroccan laryngectomized patients.Entities:
Keywords: Erygmophonic speech; formants; perturbation analysis method; spectrogram
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26587121 PMCID: PMC4633833 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2015.21.270.4301
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pan Afr Med J
Average values of fundamental frequency (F0), first, second, third and fourth (F1, F2, F3 and F4) formant frequency values of the sustained vowel /a/ produced by Moroccan erygmophonic speakers
| F0 | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months | 285 (17) | 1024 (45) | 2081 (48) | 3159 (68) | 4295 (36) |
| 6 months | 204 (23) | 898 (128) | 1858 (134) | 3079(142) | 4125 (78) |
| 9 months | 257 (65) | 834 (143) | 1830 (127) | 3090(183) | 4147 (112) |
| 12 months | 239 (75) |
| 1773 (213) | 2903(227) | 4055 (245) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
is the statistical significance of the enhancement of formants values through rehabilitation process.
Figure 1Average formant values of sustained /a/ produced by Moroccan erygmophonic and laryngeal speakers; (p: statistically significant at 0.05 level)
Results of perturbation analysis of normal and erygmophonic voices
| Laryngeal voice | Erygmophonic voice | Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test Results ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean Jitter for Arabic (Hz) | M= 112 | M= 0.95 | N= 33 |
| SD= 2.75 | SD= 0.36 |
| |
| Mean jitter for French (Hz) | M= 91 | M= 0.593 | N= 33 |
| SD= 5.87 | SD= 0.51 |
| |
| Mean shimmer for Arabic (dB) | M= 0.75 | M= 0.324 | N= 33 |
| SD= 0.3 | SD= 0.21 |
| |
| Mean shimmer for French (dB) | M= 0.81 | M= 0.297 | N= 33 |
| SD= 0.21 | SD= 0.33 |
| |
| Err count | M= 0 | M= 79.3 | N= 33 |
| SD= 0 | SD= 53.1 |
|
Abbreviations: : Mean; : standard deviation; : the amount of speech samples; : error. (*): statistical significance set at the level of =0.05
Figure 2The spectrogram of the laryngeal production of “te” exhibits a well-defined onset of voicing and a formantic organisation
Figure 3The spectrogram of “te” for a patient at the end of the speech training shows higher F4 frequency, low extent of voicing and observance of the formantic organization