Literature DB >> 26586723

Identification of Selective Lead Compounds for Treatment of High-Ploidy Breast Cancer.

Alka Choudhary1, Brittany Zachek1, Robert F Lera1, Lauren M Zasadil2, Amber Lasek1, Ryan A Denu1, Hyunjung Kim1, Craig Kanugh3, Jennifer J Laffin4, Josephine M Harter5, Kari B Wisinski1, Sandeep Saha6, Beth A Weaver2, Mark E Burkard7.   

Abstract

Increased ploidy is common in tumors but treatments for tumors with excess chromosome sets are not available. Here, we characterize high-ploidy breast cancers and identify potential anticancer compounds selective for the high-ploidy state. Among 354 human breast cancers, 10% have mean chromosome copy number exceeding 3, and this is most common in triple-negative and HER2-positive types. Women with high-ploidy breast cancers have higher risk of recurrence and death in two patient cohorts, demonstrating that it represents an important group for improved treatment. Because high-ploidy cancers are aneuploid, rather than triploid or tetraploid, we devised a two-step screen to identify selective compounds. The screen was designed to assure both external validity on diverse karyotypic backgrounds and specificity for high-ploidy cell types. This screen identified novel therapies specific to high-ploidy cells. First, we discovered 8-azaguanine, an antimetabolite that is activated by hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 (HPRT1), suggesting an elevated gene-dosage of HPRT1 in high-ploidy tumors can control sensitivity to this drug. Second, we discovered a novel compound, 2,3-diphenylbenzo[g]quinoxaline-5,10-dione (DPBQ). DPBQ activates p53 and triggers apoptosis in a polyploid-specific manner, but does not inhibit topoisomerase or bind DNA. Mechanistic analysis demonstrates that DPBQ elicits a hypoxia gene signature and its effect is replicated, in part, by enhancing oxidative stress. Structure-function analysis defines the core benzo[g]quinoxaline-5,10 dione as being necessary for the polyploid-specific effects of DPBQ. We conclude that polyploid breast cancers represent a high-risk subgroup and that DPBQ provides a functional core to develop polyploid-selective therapy. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(1); 48-59. ©2015 AACR. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26586723      PMCID: PMC4707107          DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther        ISSN: 1535-7163            Impact factor:   6.261


  45 in total

Review 1.  The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid.

Authors:  Luca Comai
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Cytokinesis failure triggers hippo tumor suppressor pathway activation.

Authors:  Neil J Ganem; Hauke Cornils; Shang-Yi Chiu; Kevin P O'Rourke; Jonathan Arnaud; Dean Yimlamai; Manuel Théry; Fernando D Camargo; David Pellman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  The NCI60 human tumour cell line anticancer drug screen.

Authors:  Robert H Shoemaker
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 4.  The causes and consequences of polyploidy in normal development and cancer.

Authors:  Teresa Davoli; Titia de Lange
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 13.827

5.  Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles.

Authors:  Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The cytotoxicity of thioguanine vs mercaptopurine in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  P C Adamson; D G Poplack; F M Balis
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.156

7.  CARM1 methylates chromatin remodeling factor BAF155 to enhance tumor progression and metastasis.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Zibo Zhao; Mark B Meyer; Sandeep Saha; Menggang Yu; Ailan Guo; Kari B Wisinski; Wei Huang; Weibo Cai; J Wesley Pike; Ming Yuan; Paul Ahlquist; Wei Xu
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 31.743

8.  Increased tetraploidy: cell-specific for the Gardner gene in the cultured cell.

Authors:  B S Danes
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Resveratrol and aspirin eliminate tetraploid cells for anticancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  Delphine Lissa; Laura Senovilla; Santiago Rello-Varona; Ilio Vitale; Mickaël Michaud; Federico Pietrocola; Alice Boilève; Florine Obrist; Chloé Bordenave; Pauline Garcia; Judith Michels; Mohamed Jemaà; Oliver Kepp; Maria Castedo; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A primate virus generates transformed human cells by fusion.

Authors:  Dominik M Duelli; Stephen Hearn; Michael P Myers; Yuri Lazebnik
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  8 in total

1.  Centrosome Amplification in Cancer Disrupts Autophagy and Sensitizes to Autophagy Inhibition.

Authors:  Ryan A Denu; Gulpreet Kaur; Madilyn M Sass; Aparna Lakkaraju; Mark E Burkard
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 5.852

2.  Survival-Associated Metabolic Genes and Risk Scoring System in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Chundi Gao; Huayao Li; Chao Zhou; Cun Liu; Jing Zhuang; Lijuan Liu; Changgang Sun
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 6.055

3.  A Selective β-Catenin-Metadherin/CEACAM1-CCL3 Axis Mediates Metastatic Heterogeneity upon Tumor-Macrophage Interaction.

Authors:  Sally K Y To; Maggie K S Tang; Yin Tong; Jiangwen Zhang; Karen K L Chan; Philip P C Ip; Jue Shi; Alice S T Wong
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 17.521

4.  Analysis of the "centrosome-ome" identifies MCPH1 deletion as a cause of centrosome amplification in human cancer.

Authors:  Ryan A Denu; Mark E Burkard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  High nuclear TPX2 expression correlates with TP53 mutation and poor clinical behavior in a large breast cancer cohort, but is not an independent predictor of chromosomal instability.

Authors:  Daniel R Matson; Ryan A Denu; Lauren M Zasadil; Mark E Burkard; Beth A Weaver; Christopher Flynn; P Todd Stukenberg
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Mesenchymal Stem Cells and their Derived Exosomes Promote Malignant Phenotype of Polyploid Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Cells through AMPK Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Lili Wang; Mingyue Ouyang; Sining Xing; Song Zhao; Shuo Liu; Lingyan Sun; Huiying Yu
Journal:  Anal Cell Pathol (Amst)       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 2.916

7.  Context-dependent effects of whole-genome duplication during mammary tumor recurrence.

Authors:  Rachel Newcomb; Emily Dean; Brock J McKinney; James V Alvarez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Centrosome amplification induces high grade features and is prognostic of worse outcomes in breast cancer.

Authors:  Ryan A Denu; Lauren M Zasadil; Craig Kanugh; Jennifer Laffin; Beth A Weaver; Mark E Burkard
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.