Literature DB >> 26586603

Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: A white paper from the European Association for Palliative Care.

Lukas Radbruch1, Carlo Leget2, Patrick Bahr3, Christof Müller-Busch4, John Ellershaw5, Franco de Conno6, Paul Vanden Berghe7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recognition of the ongoing discussion on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, the Board of Directors of the European Association for Palliative Care commissioned this white paper from the palliative care perspective. AIM: This white paper aims to provide an ethical framework for palliative care professionals on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. It also aims to provide an overview on the available evidence as well as a discourse of ethical principles related to these issues.
DESIGN: Starting from a 2003 European Association for Palliative Care position paper, 21 statements were drafted and submitted to a five-round Delphi process PARTICIPANTS: A panel with 17 experts commented on the paper in round 1. Board members of national palliative care or hospice associations that are collective members of European Association for Palliative Care were invited to an online survey in rounds 2 and 3. The expert panel and the European Association for Palliative Care board members participated in rounds 4 and 5. This final version was adopted as an official position paper of the European Association for Palliative Care in April 2015.
RESULTS: Main topics of the white paper are concepts and definitions of palliative care, its values and philosophy, euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, key issues on the patient and the organizational level. The consensus process confirmed the 2003 European Association for Palliative Care white paper and its position on the relationship between palliative care and euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide.
CONCLUSION: The European Association for Palliative Care feels that it is important to contribute to informed public debates on these issues. Complete consensus seems to be unachievable due to incompatible normative frameworks that clash.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Euthanasia; consensus process; online survey; palliative sedation; physician-assisted suicide

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26586603     DOI: 10.1177/0269216315616524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Med        ISSN: 0269-2163            Impact factor:   4.762


  32 in total

1.  [Austrian guideline for palliative sedation therapy (long version) : Results of a Delphi process of the Austrian Palliative Society (OPG)].

Authors:  Dietmar Weixler; Sophie Roider-Schur; Rudolf Likar; Claudia Bozzaro; Thomas Daniczek; Angelika Feichtner; Christoph Gabl; Bernhard Hammerl-Ferrari; Maria Kletecka-Pulker; Ulrich H J Körtner; Hilde Kössler; Johannes G Meran; Aurelia Miksovsky; Bettina Pusswald; Thomas Wienerroither; Herbert Watzke
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2016-12-06

2.  Changes in opinions on palliative sedation of palliative care specialists over 16 years and their effects on clinical practice.

Authors:  Sayaka Maeda; Tatsuya Morita; Masayuki Ikenaga; Hirofumi Abo; Yoshiyuki Kizawa; Satoru Tsuneto
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Physician and Surrogate Agreement with Assisted Dying and Continuous Deep Sedation in Advanced Dementia in Switzerland.

Authors:  Andrea Jutta Loizeau; Simon M Cohen; Susan L Mitchell; Nathan Theill; Stefanie Eicher; Mike Martin; Florian Riese
Journal:  Neurodegener Dis       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.977

4.  Ambivalence toward euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide has decreased among physicians in Finland.

Authors:  Reetta P Piili; Pekka Louhiala; Jukka Vänskä; Juho T Lehto
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.834

5.  An exploration of person-centred approach in end-of-life care policies in England and Japan.

Authors:  Chao Fang; Miho Tanaka
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.113

6.  [Ethical arguments for and against the participation of the medical profession in assisted death: analysis of the Ethics Department of the Chilean Medical Association].

Authors:  SofÍa P Salas; Rodrigo A Salinas; Mauricio Besio; Constanza Micolich; AnamarÍa Arriagada; Adelio Misseroni Raddatz; Carlos Y Valenzuela; Fernando Novoa; Gladys BÓrquez EstefÓ
Journal:  Rev Med Chil       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 0.553

7.  Euthanasia in Belgium: trends in reported cases between 2003 and 2013.

Authors:  Sigrid Dierickx; Luc Deliens; Joachim Cohen; Kenneth Chambaere
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  Palliative Sedation for the Terminally Ill Patient.

Authors:  Ferdinando Garetto; Ferdinando Cancelli; Romina Rossi; Marco Maltoni
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.749

9.  Awareness and Attitudes towards Advance Care Directives (ACDs): An Online Survey of Portuguese Adults.

Authors:  Carlos Laranjeira; Maria Dos Anjos Dixe; Luís Gueifão; Lina Caetano; Rui Passadouro; Ana Querido
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-29

10.  The views of Aotearoa/New Zealand adults over 60 years regarding the End of Life Choice Act 2019.

Authors:  Rosemary Frey; Deborah Balmer
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2021-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.