Literature DB >> 26586504

An Overview of Electrostatic Free Energy Computations for Solutions and Proteins.

Yen-Lin Lin1, Alexey Aleksandrov2, Thomas Simonson2, Benoît Roux1,3.   

Abstract

Free energy simulations for electrostatic and charging processes in complex molecular systems encounter specific difficulties owing to the long-range, 1/r Coulomb interaction. To calculate the solvation free energy of a simple ion, it is essential to take into account the polarization of nearby solvent but also the electrostatic potential drop across the liquid-gas boundary, however distant. The latter does not exist in a simulation model based on periodic boundary conditions because there is no physical boundary to the system. An important consequence is that the reference value of the electrostatic potential is not an ion in a vacuum. Also, in an infinite system, the electrostatic potential felt by a perturbing charge is conditionally convergent and dependent on the choice of computational conventions. Furthermore, with Ewald lattice summation and tinfoil conducting boundary conditions, the charges experience a spurious shift in the potential that depends on the details of the simulation system such as the volume fraction occupied by the solvent. All these issues can be handled with established computational protocols, as reviewed here and illustrated for several small ions and three solvated proteins.

Year:  2014        PMID: 26586504     DOI: 10.1021/ct500195p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  39 in total

1.  Copper Oxidation/Reduction in Water and Protein: Studies with DFTB3/MM and VALBOND Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Haiyun Jin; Puja Goyal; Akshaya Kumar Das; Michael Gaus; Markus Meuwly; Qiang Cui
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Travis Jensen; David R Slochower; Matteo Aldeghi; Vytautas Gapsys; Dimitris Ntekoumes; Stefano Bosisio; Michail Papadourakis; Niel M Henriksen; Bert L de Groot; Zoe Cournia; Alex Dickson; Julien Michel; Michael K Gilson; Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Polarizable Force Field for Molecular Ions Based on the Classical Drude Oscillator.

Authors:  Fang-Yu Lin; Pedro E M Lopes; Edward Harder; Benoît Roux; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Allosteric response and substrate sensitivity in peptide binding of the signal recognition particle.

Authors:  Connie Y Wang; Thomas F Miller
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Accuracy limit of rigid 3-point water models.

Authors:  Saeed Izadi; Alexey V Onufriev
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; Bryce K Allen; Timothy J Giese; Zhenyu Guo; Pengfei Li; Charles Lin; T Dwight McGee; David A Pearlman; Brian K Radak; Yujun Tao; Hsu-Chun Tsai; Huafeng Xu; Woody Sherman; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Multiple binding modes of ibuprofen in human serum albumin identified by absolute binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Stefania Evoli; David L Mobley; Rita Guzzi; Bruno Rizzuti
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.676

8.  QM/MM free energy simulations: recent progress and challenges.

Authors:  Xiya Lu; Dong Fang; Shingo Ito; Yuko Okamoto; Victor Ovchinnikov; Qiang Cui
Journal:  Mol Simul       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.178

9.  Protein-Ligand Electrostatic Binding Free Energies from Explicit and Implicit Solvation.

Authors:  Saeed Izadi; Boris Aguilar; Alexey V Onufriev
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Constant-pH Molecular Dynamics Simulations for Large Biomolecular Systems.

Authors:  Brian K Radak; Christophe Chipot; Donghyuk Suh; Sunhwan Jo; Wei Jiang; James C Phillips; Klaus Schulten; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.