| Literature DB >> 26586458 |
Chen Chen1, Dinghua Yang1, Qunwei Wang2, Xintian Wang3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 2-10% of the patients with hepatolithiasis may develop cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Despite recent advances in the treatment of cancers, the 5-year survival rate for CCA patients currently remains poor, primarily due to early local invasion and distant metastasis of the cancer. This study aimed to investigate miR-200a expression in combined hepatolithiasis and CCA as well as its correlation with the clinical features of CCA. MATERIAL AND METHODS miR-200a expression in combined hepatolithiasis and CCA was detected by real-time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). Its correlation with the clinicopathology of CCA was analyzed by t-tests. The effect of miR-200a on the proliferation CCA cells was determined by MTT assay. The effect of miR-200a on the invasive ability of CCA cells was assessed by Boyden chamber test. RESULTS The expression level of MiR-200a in patients with combined hepatolithiasis and CCA was significantly decreased compared with patients with only hepatolithiasis (P<0.01). Furthermore, miR-200a expression in hepatic duct cancer RBE cells was substantially reduced compared with hepatolithiasis group (P<0.01). Correlation analysis showed that abnormal expression of miR-200a was only associated with the differentiation degree and metastasis of CCA. MiR-200a transfection significantly inhibited the proliferation and invasion of REB cells (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS MiR-200a may suppress the proliferative and invasive ability of REB cells. The reduced miR-200a expression might be correlated with the development and progression of CCA.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26586458 PMCID: PMC4657761 DOI: 10.12659/msm.895013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Figure 1miR-200a expression detected by qRT-PCR. (A) A, para-carcinoma tissue; B hepatolithiasis tissue; C combined hepatolithiasis and CCA. ** P<0.01 compared with group A and B. (B) A, intrahepatic bile duct epithelial cells; B, RBE cells. ** P<0.01 compared with group A.
Correlation between miR-200a expression and the clinicopathological parameters of CCA.
| Parameter | n | miR-200a | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | |||
| <60 | 33 | 0.67±0.11 | 0.773 |
| ≥60 | 27 | 0.75±0.07 | |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 30 | 0.77±0.09 | 0.718 |
| Female | 30 | 0.70±0.13 | |
| T stage | |||
| T1 | 20 | 0.71±0.11 | 0.583 |
| T2 | 20 | 0.65±0.05 | |
| T3 | 20 | 0.75±0.10 | |
| Differentiation | |||
| High/moderate | 30 | 1.05±0.15 | 0.000 |
| Low | 30 | 0.45±0.09 | |
| Lymph node metastasis | |||
| Yes | 21 | 0.59±0.07 | 0.009 |
| No | 39 | 0.94±0.11 | |
Figure 2Effect of miR-200a on the proliferation of REB cells. A, miR-200a expression detected by qRT-PCR; B, the proliferation of REB cells detected by MTT assay.
Figure 3Effect of miR-200a on the invasion of REB cells.