Literature DB >> 16834860

Treatment of non-endemic hepatolithiasis in a Western country. The role of hepatic resection.

Marco Catena1, Luca Aldrighetti, Renato Finazzi, Giandomenico Arzu, Marcella Arru, Carlo Pulitanò, Gianfranco Ferla.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and the efficacy of hepatic resective surgery in the treatment of single lobe hepatolithiasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis and comparison between hepatic resections in patients with hepatolithiasis (hepatolithiasis group [HG]) and liver masses (control group [CG]). Seventeen consecutive Caucasian patients with single lobe hepatolithiasis (HG) and 30 patients with liver masses without chronic liver disease and previous chemotherapy (CG), were operated during the 5-year period 2000-2005, inclusive. Major hepatic resections including 4 right hepatectomies, 10 left hepatectomies, and 3 left lateral sectionectomy in HG, and 12 right hepatectomies, 3 extended right hepatectomy, 5 left hepatectomies, 4 left lateral sectionectomy, 5 bisegmentectomy, and 1 mesohepatectomy in CG. The main outcome measures were: type and length of surgical procedures, intra- and postoperative blood losses and transfusions (packed red blood cells [PRBC] and fresh frozen plasma [FFP]), intra- and postoperative course and complications (within 30 days of the operation), length of hospitalisation, histopathology, and recurrence of hepatolithiasis.
RESULTS: Mean operation time was 6.21 +/- 2.38 h in HG versus 7.10 +/- 2.21 h in CG (P = 0.33). Mean intra-operative blood loss in CG was higher than in HG (1010 +/- 550 ml versus 560 +/- 459 ml; P = 0.035). The other variables considered in the two groups were not statistically different. Intra-operative transfusion were 0.50 +/- 0.85 units in HG versus 1.35 +/- 2.25 units of PRBC in CG (P = 0.06), and 0.66 +/- 1.34 units in HG versus 0.68 +/- 1.20 units of FFP in CG (P = 0.44), respectively. No cases of death were registered. Postoperative complications occurred in 12 patients (25.5%) - 5 cases (10.6%) in HG and 7 cases (14.8%) in CG (P = 0.18). Mean postoperative transfusions were 0.47 +/- 1.24 units in HG versus 1.10 +/- 1.18 units of PRBC in CG (P = 0.35), and 0.65 +/- 1.40 units in HG versus 0.46 +/- 0.82 units of FFP in CG (P = 0.25), respectively. Difference in median hospitalisation was not statistically significant (14 +/- 10 days versus 12 +/- 9 days; P = 0.28). Histopathology showed cholangiocarcinoma in 2 cases (11.7%). During the follow-up period (range, 5-127 months; mean, 50.4 +/- 41.9 months), 1 patient had lithiasis recurrence and 1 patient died for the co-existing cholangiocarcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic resection is the treatment of choice in patients with single lobe hepatolithiasis. An early indication for surgery may reduce the mortality/morbidity rates of hepatic resection for hepatolithiasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16834860      PMCID: PMC1964647          DOI: 10.1308/003588406X98711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  18 in total

1.  Role of right hepatic lobectomy in the treatment of isolated right-sided hepatolithiasis.

Authors:  C J Hung; P W Lin
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Partial hepatectomy for intrahepatic stones.

Authors:  T K Choi; J Wong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Late development of cholangiocarcinoma after the treatment of hepatolithiasis.

Authors:  K Chijiiwa; H Ichimiya; S Kuroki; A Koga; F Nakayama
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1993-09

4.  Hepatic resection for hepatolithiasis and long-term results.

Authors:  K Chijiiwa; N Kameoka; M Komura; T Yamasaki; H Noshiro; K Nakano
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Hepatolithiasis: epidemiology and classification.

Authors:  A Pausawasdi; P Watanapa
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr

6.  Hepatolithiasis associated with cholangiocarcinoma. Possible etiologic significance.

Authors:  A Koga; H Ichimiya; K Yamaguchi; K Miyazaki; F Nakayama
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Improving perioperative outcome expands the role of hepatectomy in management of benign and malignant hepatobiliary diseases: analysis of 1222 consecutive patients from a prospective database.

Authors:  Ronnie T Poon; Sheung Tat Fan; Chung Mau Lo; Chi Leung Liu; Chi Ming Lam; Wai Key Yuen; Chun Yeung; John Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Hepatic resection for hepatolithiasis.

Authors:  S T Fan; E C Lai; J Wong
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-09

9.  Current management and long-term prognosis of hepatolithiasis.

Authors:  K Chijiiwa; H Yamashita; J Yoshida; S Kuroki; M Tanaka
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1995-02

10.  Reappraisal of the systematic management of complicated hepatolithiasis with bilateral intrahepatic biliary strictures.

Authors:  K S Jeng; I Ohta; F S Yang
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1996-02
View more
  25 in total

1.  Application of combined rigid choledochoscope and accurate positioning method in the adjuvant treatment of bile duct stones.

Authors:  Ping Wang; Xiaowu Chen; Beiwang Sun; Yanmin Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

2.  Bilateral liver resection for bilateral intrahepatic stones.

Authors:  Shao-Qiang Li; Li-Jian Liang; Yun-Peng Hua; Bao-Gang Peng; Dong Chen; Shun-Jun Fu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Surgical management of hepatolithiasis.

Authors:  Sujit Vijay Sakpal; Nitin Babel; Ronald Scott Chamberlain
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 4.  Classification and management of hepatolithiasis: A high-volume, single-center's experience.

Authors:  Xiaobin Feng; Shuguo Zheng; Feng Xia; Kuansheng Ma; Shuguang Wang; Ping Bie; Jiahong Dong
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2012-11

5.  Common bile duct stones - their presentation, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Rajendra Desai; Bahaman N Shokouhi
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 0.656

6.  Sphincter of Oddi laxity: an important factor in hepatolithiasis.

Authors:  Ting-Bo Liang; Yu Liu; Xue-Li Bai; Jun Yu; Wei Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Incidence and Prognosis of Subsequent Cholangiocarcinoma in Patients with Hepatic Resection for Bile Duct Stones.

Authors:  Hyun Jung Kim; Tae Uk Kang; Heather Swan; Min Ji Kang; Nayoung Kim; Hyeong Sik Ahn; Seon Mee Park
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 8.  Early detection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Mami Hamaoka; Kazuto Kozaka; Osamu Matsui; Takahiro Komori; Takashi Matsubara; Norihide Yoneda; Kotaro Yoshida; Dai Inoue; Azusa Kitao; Wataru Koda; Toshifumi Gabata; Satoshi Kobayashi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 9.  Hepatolithiasis and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A review.

Authors:  Hyo Jung Kim; Jae Seon Kim; Moon Kyung Joo; Beom Jae Lee; Ji Hoon Kim; Jong Eun Yeon; Jong-Jae Park; Kwan Soo Byun; Young-Tae Bak
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Liver Resection for Primary Intrahepatic Stones: Focus on Postoperative Infectious Complications.

Authors:  Gennaro Clemente; Agostino M De Rose; Rita Murri; Francesco Ardito; Gennaro Nuzzo; Felice Giuliante
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.