Hongmei Wang1, Fang Qiu2, Eugene Boilesen3, Preethy Nayar4, Lina Lander5, Kate Watkins6, Shinobu Watanabe-Galloway5. 1. Department of Health Services Research and Administration, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska. hongmeiwang@unmc.edu. 2. Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska. 3. Center for Collaboration on Research Design and Analysis, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska. 4. Department of Health Services Research and Administration, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska. 5. Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska. 6. El Paso County Public Health, Communicable Disease Program, Colorado Springs, Colorado.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to examine the rural-urban differences in Medicare expenditures on end-of-life care for elderly cancer patients in the United States. METHODS: We analyzed Medicare claims data for 175,181 elderly adults with lung, colorectal, female breast, or prostate cancer diagnosis who died in 2008. The end-of-life costs were quantified as total Medicare expenditures for the last 12 months of care including inpatient, outpatient, physician services, hospice, home health, skilled nursing facilities (SNF), and durable medical expenditure. Linear regression models were used to estimate rural-urban differences in log-transformed end-of-life costs and logistic regressions were used to estimate probability of service use, adjusting for demographics, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities. FINDINGS: On average, elderly cancer patients cost Medicare $51,273, $50,274, $62,815, and $50,941 in the last year for breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer, respectively. Rural patients cost Medicare about 10%, 6%, 8%, and 4% less on end-of-life care than their urban counterparts for breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer, respectively. Rural cancer patients were less likely to use hospice and home health, more likely to use outpatient and SNF, and they cost Medicare less on inpatient and physician services and more on outpatient care conditional on service use. CONCLUSIONS: The lower Medicare spending on end-of-life care for the rural cancer patients suggests disparities based on place of residence. A future study that delineates the source of the rural-urban difference can help us understand whether it indicates inappropriate level of palliative care and find effective policies to reduce the urban-rural disparities.
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to examine the rural-urban differences in Medicare expenditures on end-of-life care for elderly cancerpatients in the United States. METHODS: We analyzed Medicare claims data for 175,181 elderly adults with lung, colorectal, female breast, or prostate cancer diagnosis who died in 2008. The end-of-life costs were quantified as total Medicare expenditures for the last 12 months of care including inpatient, outpatient, physician services, hospice, home health, skilled nursing facilities (SNF), and durable medical expenditure. Linear regression models were used to estimate rural-urban differences in log-transformed end-of-life costs and logistic regressions were used to estimate probability of service use, adjusting for demographics, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities. FINDINGS: On average, elderly cancerpatients cost Medicare $51,273, $50,274, $62,815, and $50,941 in the last year for breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer, respectively. Rural patients cost Medicare about 10%, 6%, 8%, and 4% less on end-of-life care than their urban counterparts for breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer, respectively. Rural cancerpatients were less likely to use hospice and home health, more likely to use outpatient and SNF, and they cost Medicare less on inpatient and physician services and more on outpatient care conditional on service use. CONCLUSIONS: The lower Medicare spending on end-of-life care for the rural cancerpatients suggests disparities based on place of residence. A future study that delineates the source of the rural-urban difference can help us understand whether it indicates inappropriate level of palliative care and find effective policies to reduce the urban-rural disparities.
Authors: Marie Bakitas; Kristen Allen Watts; Emily Malone; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Susan McCammon; Richard Taylor; Rodney Tucker; Ronit Elk Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2020-02-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jolyn S Taylor; Suja S Rajan; Ning Zhang; Larissa A Meyer; Lois M Ramondetta; Diane C Bodurka; David R Lairson; Sharon H Giordano Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Barbara Pesut; Brenda Hooper; Marnie Jacobsen; Barbara Nielsen; Miranda Falk; Brian P O 'Connor Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2017-06-05 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Hannah Wunsch; Damon Scales; Hayley B Gershengorn; May Hua; Andrea D Hill; Longdi Fu; Therese A Stukel; Gordon Rubenfeld; Robert A Fowler Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-07-03
Authors: Peter May; Lorna Roe; Christine A McGarrigle; Rose Anne Kenny; Charles Normand Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-02-14 Impact factor: 2.655