Literature DB >> 26586021

High exposure to inorganic arsenic by food: the need for risk reduction.

Ursula Gundert-Remy1, Georg Damm2, Heidi Foth3, Alexius Freyberger4, Thomas Gebel5, Klaus Golka6, Claudia Röhl7, Thomas Schupp8, Klaus-Michael Wollin9, Jan Georg Hengstler10.   

Abstract

Arsenic is a human carcinogen that occurs ubiquitously in soil and water. Based on epidemiological studies, a benchmark dose (lower/higher bound estimate) between 0.3 and 8 μg/kg bw/day was estimated to cause a 1 % increased risk of lung, skin and bladder cancer. A recently published study by EFSA on dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European population reported 95th percentiles (lower bound min to upper bound max) for different age groups in the same range as the benchmark dose. For toddlers, a highly exposed group, the highest values ranged between 0.61 and 2.09 µg arsenic/kg bw/day. For all other age classes, the margin of exposure is also small. This scenario calls for regulatory action to reduce arsenic exposure. One priority measure should be to reduce arsenic in food categories that contribute most to exposure. In the EFSA study the food categories 'milk and dairy products,' 'drinking water' and 'food for infants' represent major sources of inorganic arsenic for infants and also rice is an important source. Long-term strategies are required to reduce inorganic arsenic in these food groups. The reduced consumption of rice and rice products which has been recommended may be helpful for a minority of individuals consuming unusually high amounts of rice. However, it is only of limited value for the general European population, because the food categories 'grain-based processed products (non rice-based)' or 'milk and dairy products' contribute more to the exposure with inorganic arsenic than the food category 'rice.' A balanced regulatory activity focusing on the most relevant food categories is required. In conclusion, exposure to inorganic arsenic represents a risk to the health of the European population, particularly to young children. Regulatory measures to reduce exposure are urgently required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arsenic; Drinking water; Human exposure; Regulatory toxicology; Rice; Risk assessment; Risk management; Threshold values

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26586021     DOI: 10.1007/s00204-015-1627-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  19 in total

Review 1.  Rice Intake and Emerging Concerns on Arsenic in Rice: a Review of the Human Evidence and Methodologic Challenges.

Authors:  Margaret R Karagas; Tracy Punshon; Matt Davis; Catherine M Bulka; Francis Slaughter; Despina Karalis; Maria Argos; Habibul Ahsan
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2019-12

Review 2.  Neurotoxicity Linked to Dysfunctional Metal Ion Homeostasis and Xenobiotic Metal Exposure: Redox Signaling and Oxidative Stress.

Authors:  Carla Garza-Lombó; Yanahi Posadas; Liliana Quintanar; María E Gonsebatt; Rodrigo Franco
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 8.401

3.  Mitigating dietary arsenic exposure: Current status in the United States and recommendations for an improved path forward.

Authors:  Keeve E Nachman; Gary L Ginsberg; Mark D Miller; Carolyn J Murray; Anne E Nigra; Claire B Pendergrast
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Intra- and Interlaboratory Evaluation of an Assay of Soil Arsenic Relative Bioavailability in Mice.

Authors:  Karen Bradham; Carina Herde; Paul Herde; Albert L Juhasz; Karen Herbin-Davis; Brittany Elek; Amy Farthing; Gary L Diamond; David J Thomas
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 5.279

Review 5.  Arsenic-induced neurotoxicity: a mechanistic appraisal.

Authors:  Carla Garza-Lombó; Aglaia Pappa; Mihalis I Panayiotidis; María E Gonsebatt; Rodrigo Franco
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.358

6.  Embryonic arsenic exposure reduces intestinal cell proliferation and alters hepatic IGF mRNA expression in killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus).

Authors:  Kaleigh C Sims; Katey L Schwendinger; Dana B Szymkowicz; Jonathan R Swetenberg; Lisa J Bain
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2019-02-07

Review 7.  Critical evaluation of human health risks due to hydraulic fracturing in natural gas and petroleum production.

Authors:  Klaus-Michael Wollin; G Damm; H Foth; A Freyberger; T Gebel; A Mangerich; U Gundert-Remy; F Partosch; C Röhl; T Schupp; Jan G Hengstler
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 8.  The possible role of arsenic and gene-arsenic interactions in susceptibility to breast cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Roxana Moslehi; Cristy Stagnar; Sneha Srinivasan; Pawel Radziszowski; David O Carpenter
Journal:  Rev Environ Health       Date:  2020-12-25       Impact factor: 4.022

9.  Highlight report: Occupational urinary bladder cancer.

Authors:  H M Bolt
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.068

10.  Rice versus Drinking Water: Estimating the Primary Source of Arsenic in the U.S. Diet.

Authors:  Julia R Barrett
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.