| Literature DB >> 26585246 |
Si Shen1, Hao Wang2, Jing Zhang3, Fei Wang4, Meng Chen5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a serious problem in the recent aging society, and early diagnosis and intervention of articular cartilage degeneration are very important for the onset of OA. Therefore, development of newer MRI techniques is necessary and expected for detection of early articular cartilage degeneration.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26585246 PMCID: PMC4653945 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-015-0810-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Fig. 1T2-weighted images of the FCC on experimental side (left side) in Group e and Group a-d. MRI with T2WI shown normal signal on sagittal view
Fig. 2T1ρ original sagittal images of the FCC on experimental side (left side) in Group e and Group a-d before T1ρ fitting. There was no significant imaging change of the cartilage
Fig. 3T1ρ pseudo-color images of the FCC on experimental side in Group E and Group a-d after T1ρ fitting. Compared with Group E, the color of FCC in Group a-d gradually became darker, i.e., progressive changes from pale green to dark green were noted
Fig. 4Shown were sections of H&E stained (×100) FCC from Group e, and the experimental sides of Group a-d. The normal morphology of chondrocytes in Group a-d gradually disappeared, and fibrosis of the ECM was observed, indicating early degeneration in the FCC of the experimental side
Fig. 5Shown were sections of Safranin-O and Fast Green stained (×100) FCC from Group e, and the experimental sides of Group a-d. In Group a-d, intensity of red positively correlated with the presence of glycosaminoglycans attached to PG gradually became pale, meanwhile the range of Fast Green staining of the collagen fibers gradually increased, indicating early cartilage degeneration
T1ρ values of LFCC and MFCC in the bilateral knees of rabbits expressed as the mean ± standard deviation
| T1ρ (ms) | Group A | Group B | Group C | Group D | Group Ee
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental side | Control sidea | Experimental side | Control | Experimental side | Control | Experimental side | Control | EA
| EB
| EC
| ED
| |
| LFCC | 43.89 ± 4.87 | 37.69 ± 6.73 | 55.41 ± 6.99 | 38.45 ± 5.83 | 68.74 ± 6.40 | 39.10 ± 5.77 | 79.63 ± 12.26 | 49.67 ± 8.46 | 39.11 ± 4.51 | 41.77 ± 8.05 | 39.38 ± 7.6 | 45.33 ± 12.42 |
| 95 % CI | 42.75-45.04 | 36.11-39.28 | 53.44-57.38 | 36.81-40.08 | 66.47-71.01 | 37.05-41.15 | 73.54-85.73 | 45.46-53.88 | 36.79-41.44 | 37.31-46.23 | 33.53-45.23 | 14.48-76.18 |
| MFCC | 44.53 ± 5.10 | 37.53 ± 7.57 | 55.33 ± 5.98 | 38.72 ± 5.14 | 69.54 ± 6.39 | 39.76 ± 5.62 | 74.91 ± 11.6 | 47.36 ± 8.44 | 38.50 ± 6.48 | 40.77 ± 5.43 | 41.43 ± 6.42 | 35.08 ± 4.88 |
| 95 % CI | 43.3-45.73 | 35.75-39.31 | 53.64-57.02 | 37.27-40.16 | 67.26-71.8 | 37.76-41.75 | 69.14-80.68 | 43.16-51.56 | 35.17-41.80 | 37.75-43.78 | 36.49-46.37 | 22.94-47.22 |
*There was no significant difference in T1ρ values between the LFCC and MFCC, within the bilateral knees of Group A, B, C, and D (P > 0.05)
aBetween the control side of Group A and the subgroup EA, no difference in T1ρ values of LFCC existed (t = −0.98, P = 0.33), and also no difference in T1ρ values of MFCC existed (t = −1.05, P = 0.30)
bBetween the control side of Group B and the subgroup EB, no difference in T1ρ values of LFCC existed (t = −1.12, P = 0.27), and also no difference in T1ρ values of MFCC existed (t = −1.51, P = 0.14)
cBetween the control side of Group C and the subgroup EC, no difference in T1ρ values of LFCC existed (t = −1.51, P = 0.14), and also no difference in T1ρ values of MFCC existed (t = −1.30, P =0.20)
dThe T1ρ value of LFCC on control side in Group D was significantly higher than in subgroup ED (t =2.49, P = 0.02), and the T1ρ value of MFCC was obviously greater than in subgroup ED too (t = 4.70, P = 0.00)
eNo difference of T1ρ values existed in Group E (P > 0.05)
Fig 6T1ρ values of LFCC and MFCC on the experimental side compared with the control side in Group a-d. T1ρ values of the experimental side were significantly higher than the control side (P < 0.05)
Fig. 7Differences in T1ρ values of LFCC and MFCC among Group a, b, c, and d. 7a From Group A to Group D, T1ρ values of LFCC and MFCC on the experimental side increased gradually (P < 0.05). 7b: No difference in T1ρ values of the control side existed among Group A, B, and C (P > 0.05), while the T1ρ value in Group D was obviously greater than in Group A, B, and C (P < 0.05)
Fig. 8Gross specimens of a rabbit model in the experimental groups. The FCC of the bilateral knees was observed to be smooth and with little change in morphology