| Literature DB >> 26584635 |
Norisato Mitsutake1,2, Toshihiko Fukushima3, Michiko Matsuse1, Tatiana Rogounovitch4, Vladimir Saenko5, Shinya Uchino6, Masahiro Ito7, Keiji Suzuki1, Shinichi Suzuki3, Shunichi Yamashita1,5.
Abstract
After the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, the thyroid ultrasound screening program for children aged 0-18 at the time of the accident was started from October 2011. The prevalence of thyroid carcinomas in that population has appeared to be very high (84 cases per 296,253). To clarify the pathogenesis, we investigated the presence of driver mutations in these tumours. 61 classic papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTCs), two follicular variant PTCs, four cribriform-morular variant PTCs and one poorly-differentiated thyroid carcinoma were analysed. We detected BRAF(V600E) in 43 cases (63.2%), RET/PTC1 in six (8.8%), RET/PTC3 in one (1.5%) and ETV6/NTRK3 in four (5.9%). Among classic and follicular variant PTCs, BRAF(V600E) was significantly associated with the smaller size. The genetic pattern was completely different from post-Chernobyl PTCs, suggesting non-radiogenic etiology of these cancers. This is the first study demonstrating the oncogene profile in the thyroid cancers discovered by large mass screening, which probably reflects genetic status of all sporadic and latent tumours in the young Japanese population. It is assumed that BRAF(V600E) may not confer growth advantage on paediatric PTCs, and many of these cases grow slowly, suggesting that additional factors may be important for tumour progression in paediatric PTCs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26584635 PMCID: PMC4653756 DOI: 10.1038/srep16976
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Clinicopathological features of the current cases.
| Age at operation (ave, y.o. ± s.d.) | 17.3 ± 2.8 |
| (median: range, y.o.) | 18: 9–22 |
| Sex | |
| M | 22 |
| F | 46 |
| Tumor size (mm ± s.d.) | 14.7 ± 9.2 |
| Histology | |
| CP | 61 |
| FV | 2 |
| CMV | 4 |
| PD | 1 |
| pT | |
| pT1 or 2 | 37 |
| pT3 | 31 |
| pN | |
| pN0 | 15 |
| pN1a or 1b | 52 |
| M | |
| M0 | 65 |
| M1 | 2 |
| pEx | |
| pEx0 | 36 |
| pEx1 | 32 |
CP: classic papillary, FV: follicular variant, CMV: cribriform-morular variant, PDTC: poorly differentiated.
Genetic alterations in the current cases.
| 43 (63.2%) | |
| 0 | |
| 0 | |
| 0 | |
| 6 (8.8%) | |
| 1 (1.5%) | |
| 4 (5.9%) | |
| 0 | |
| 0 | |
| 0 | |
| 0 |
*including 4 cases in which the strength of A signal in the sequence chromatogram was less than 20% compared to that of T signal.
Association of the BRAF mutation with clinicopathological features of the PTC cases found by mass screening.
| Rearrangement or unknown mutation | Univariate p-value; OR (95% CI) | Multivariate p-value; OR or B (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All PTC cases | 43 | 20 | ||
| Age at operation (y.o. ± s.d.) | 18.2 ± 2.3 | 16.7 ± 3.7 | 0.115 | |
| Sex | 0.155 | 0.089; OR = 3.115 (0.841–11.494) | ||
| M | 18 | 4 | ||
| F | 25 | 16 | ||
| Tumor size (mm ± s.d.) | 12.2 ± 6.8 | 18.3 ± 9.5 | ||
| Microcarcinoma | ||||
| ≤10 mm | 22 | 3 | ||
| >10 mm | 21 | 17 | ||
| Histology | 0.097 | Not performed because of no FV in the | ||
| CP | 43 | 18 | ||
| FV | 0 | 2 | ||
| pT | 0.103 | 0.086; OR = 2.779 (0.866–8.923) | ||
| pT1 or 2 | 26 | 7 | ||
| pT3 | 17 | 13 | ||
| pN | 0.714 | 0.783; OR = 0.800 (0.164–3.917) | ||
| pN0 | 6 | 4 | ||
| pN1a or 1b | 36 | 16 | ||
| M | 0.090 | Not performed because of no M in the | ||
| M0 | 43 | 17 | ||
| M1 | 0 | 2 | ||
| pEx | 0.109 | 0.096; OR = 0.370 (0.115–1.193) | ||
| pEx0 | 18 | 13 | ||
| pEx1 | 25 | 7 |
aMann-Whitney test.
bFisher’s exact test.
cLinear regression adjusted for sex.
dLinear regression adjusted for age and sex.
eLogistic regression adjusted for age.
fLogistic regression adjusted for age and sex. OR: odds ratio, B: regression coefficient, CI: confidential interval, CP: classic papillary, FV: follicular variant.