Sander van Hoeve1, Jim de Vos1, Jan P A M Verbruggen1, Paul Willems2, Kenneth Meijer2, Martijn Poeze1. 1. Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, the Netherlands. E-mail address for S. van Hoeve: s.vanhoeve@student.maastrichtuniversity.nl. 2. Department of Movement Sciences, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Calcaneal fractures are associated with substantial morbidity and socioeconomic impact, frequently leading to limited functional outcome and high economic costs. The Oxford foot model (OFM) has been reported as a valid addition to the biomechanical examination of the foot. The aim of our study was to analyze the gait of patients after operative repair of a calcaneal fracture in relation to functional outcome and radiographic findings. METHODS: Thirteen patients with a calcaneal fracture underwent gait analysis with OFM at a minimum of six months after open surgery. Intersegmental range of motion was measured during gait. Results were compared with those of healthy subjects and those of patients who had undergone subtalar arthrodesis. Patient-reported questionnaires and radiographic images were also evaluated. RESULTS: The range of motion between the hindfoot and the tibia in the push-off phase in the transverse plane was significantly correlated with the clinical outcome as reported by patients based on the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) (r(2) = 0.51; p < 0.001) and the Short Form (SF)-36 physical component summary score (r(2) = 0.52; p < 0.001). We found a significant correlation between the step-off in the subtalar joint as measured on postoperative computed tomography (CT) and range of motion (r(2) = -0.74; p = 0.004). The step-off was also correlated with the patient-reported outcome questionnaire FADI (r(2) = -0.76; p = 0.003) and the SF-36 physical component summary score (r(2) = -0.78; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the subtalar joint range of motion of patients after a calcaneal fracture was related both to the quality of the reduction of the subtalar joint as evaluated on postoperative CT scans and patient-reported functional outcome.
BACKGROUND: Calcaneal fractures are associated with substantial morbidity and socioeconomic impact, frequently leading to limited functional outcome and high economic costs. The Oxford foot model (OFM) has been reported as a valid addition to the biomechanical examination of the foot. The aim of our study was to analyze the gait of patients after operative repair of a calcaneal fracture in relation to functional outcome and radiographic findings. METHODS: Thirteen patients with a calcaneal fracture underwent gait analysis with OFM at a minimum of six months after open surgery. Intersegmental range of motion was measured during gait. Results were compared with those of healthy subjects and those of patients who had undergone subtalar arthrodesis. Patient-reported questionnaires and radiographic images were also evaluated. RESULTS: The range of motion between the hindfoot and the tibia in the push-off phase in the transverse plane was significantly correlated with the clinical outcome as reported by patients based on the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) (r(2) = 0.51; p < 0.001) and the Short Form (SF)-36 physical component summary score (r(2) = 0.52; p < 0.001). We found a significant correlation between the step-off in the subtalar joint as measured on postoperative computed tomography (CT) and range of motion (r(2) = -0.74; p = 0.004). The step-off was also correlated with the patient-reported outcome questionnaire FADI (r(2) = -0.76; p = 0.003) and the SF-36 physical component summary score (r(2) = -0.78; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the subtalar joint range of motion of patients after a calcaneal fracture was related both to the quality of the reduction of the subtalar joint as evaluated on postoperative CT scans and patient-reported functional outcome.
Authors: R Dubbeldam; J H Buurke; C Simons; C G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn; H Baan; A V Nene; H J Hermens Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Georgios Alexandridis; Amy C Gunning; Ger D J van Olden; Egbert-Jan M M Verleisdonk; Michiel J M Segers; Luke P H Leenen Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2018-03-17 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Sander van Hoeve; Michael Houben; Jan P A M Verbruggen; Paul Willems; Kenneth Meijer; Martijn Poeze Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2019-04-12 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Eric Swart; Richard Peindl; Nigel Zheng; Nahir Habet; Christine Churchill; John Adam Ruder; Rachel Seymour; Madhav Karunakar; James Kellam; Stephen Sims Journal: OTA Int Date: 2019-05-14