Megan E Piper1,2, Michael C Fiore1,2, Stevens S Smith1,2, David Fraser1, Daniel M Bolt3, Linda M Collins4, Robin Mermelstein5, Tanya R Schlam1,2, Jessica W Cook1,2,6, Douglas E Jorenby1,2, Wei-Yin Loh7, Timothy B Baker1,2. 1. Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. 2. University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medicine, Madison, WI, USA. 3. University of Wisconsin, Department of Educational Psychology, Madison, WI, USA. 4. The Methodology Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA. 5. University of Illinois at Chicago, Institute for Health Research and Policy, Chicago, IL, USA. 6. William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, USA. 7. University of Wisconsin, Department of Statistics, Madison, WI, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: To identify promising intervention components intended to help smokers to attain and maintain abstinence in their quit smoking attempts. DESIGN: A fully crossed, six-factor randomized fractional factorial experiment. SETTING:Eleven primary care clinics in southern Wisconsin, USA. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 637 adult smokers (55% women, 88% white) motivated to quit smoking who visited primary care clinics. INTERVENTIONS: Six intervention components designed to prepare smokers to quit, and achieve and maintain abstinence (i.e. for the preparation, cessation and maintenance phases of smoking treatment): (1) preparation nicotine patch versus none; (2) preparation nicotine gum versus none; (3) preparation counseling versus none; (4) intensive cessation in-person counseling versus minimal; (5) intensive cessation telephone counseling versus minimal; and (6) 16 versus 8 weeks of combination nicotine replacement therapy (nicotine patch + nicotine gum). MEASUREMENTS: Seven-day self-reported point-prevalence abstinence at 16 weeks. FINDINGS: Preparation counseling significantly improved week 16 abstinence rates (P = .04), while both forms of preparation nicotine replacement therapy interacted synergistically with intensive cessation in-person counseling (P < 0.05). Conversely, intensive cessation phone counseling and intensive cessation in-person counseling interacted antagonistically (P < 0.05)-these components produced higher abstinence rates by themselves than in combination. CONCLUSIONS: Preparation counseling and the combination of intensive cessation in-person counseling with preparation nicotine gum or patch are promising intervention components for smoking and should be evaluated as an integrated treatment package.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To identify promising intervention components intended to help smokers to attain and maintain abstinence in their quit smoking attempts. DESIGN: A fully crossed, six-factor randomized fractional factorial experiment. SETTING: Eleven primary care clinics in southern Wisconsin, USA. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 637 adult smokers (55% women, 88% white) motivated to quit smoking who visited primary care clinics. INTERVENTIONS: Six intervention components designed to prepare smokers to quit, and achieve and maintain abstinence (i.e. for the preparation, cessation and maintenance phases of smoking treatment): (1) preparation nicotine patch versus none; (2) preparation nicotinegum versus none; (3) preparation counseling versus none; (4) intensive cessation in-person counseling versus minimal; (5) intensive cessation telephone counseling versus minimal; and (6) 16 versus 8 weeks of combination nicotine replacement therapy (nicotine patch + nicotinegum). MEASUREMENTS: Seven-day self-reported point-prevalence abstinence at 16 weeks. FINDINGS: Preparation counseling significantly improved week 16 abstinence rates (P = .04), while both forms of preparation nicotine replacement therapy interacted synergistically with intensive cessation in-person counseling (P < 0.05). Conversely, intensive cessation phone counseling and intensive cessation in-person counseling interacted antagonistically (P < 0.05)-these components produced higher abstinence rates by themselves than in combination. CONCLUSIONS: Preparation counseling and the combination of intensive cessation in-person counseling with preparation nicotinegum or patch are promising intervention components for smoking and should be evaluated as an integrated treatment package.
Authors: Timothy B Baker; Robin Mermelstein; Linda M Collins; Megan E Piper; Douglas E Jorenby; Stevens S Smith; Bruce A Christiansen; Tanya R Schlam; Jessica W Cook; Michael C Fiore Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2011-04
Authors: Saul Shiffman; Deborah M Scharf; William G Shadel; Chad J Gwaltney; Qianyu Dang; Stephanie M Paton; Duncan B Clark Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2006-04
Authors: Jack F Hollis; Timothy A McAfee; Jeffrey L Fellows; Susan M Zbikowski; Michael Stark; Karen Riedlinger Journal: Tob Control Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Linda M Collins; Jessica B Trail; Kari C Kugler; Timothy B Baker; Megan E Piper; Robin J Mermelstein Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Megan E Piper; Jessica W Cook; Tanya R Schlam; Douglas E Jorenby; Stevens S Smith; Linda M Collins; Robin Mermelstein; David Fraser; Michael C Fiore; Timothy B Baker Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2018-09-13
Authors: John A Gallis; Gary G Bennett; Dori M Steinberg; Sandy Askew; Elizabeth L Turner Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2019-11-25 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Nayoung Kim; Danielle E McCarthy; Wei-Yin Loh; Jessica W Cook; Megan E Piper; Tanya R Schlam; Timothy B Baker Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-10-25 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Joanna Buscemi; E Amy Janke; Kari C Kugler; Jenna Duffecy; Thelma J Mielenz; Sara M St George; Sherri N Sheinfeld Gorin Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2016-08-01
Authors: Megan E Piper; Tanya R Schlam; Jessica W Cook; Stevens S Smith; Daniel M Bolt; Wei-Yin Loh; Robin Mermelstein; Linda M Collins; Michael C Fiore; Timothy B Baker Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2016-11-25 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Megan E Piper; Jessica W Cook; Tanya R Schlam; Stevens S Smith; Daniel M Bolt; Linda M Collins; Robin Mermelstein; Michael C Fiore; Timothy B Baker Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2016-11-24 Impact factor: 4.492