Literature DB >> 25092122

Factorial experiments: efficient tools for evaluation of intervention components.

Linda M Collins1, John J Dziak2, Kari C Kugler2, Jessica B Trail3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An understanding of the individual and combined effects of a set of intervention components is important for moving the science of preventive medicine interventions forward. This understanding can often be achieved in an efficient and economical way via a factorial experiment, in which two or more independent variables are manipulated. The factorial experiment is a complement to the RCT; the two designs address different research questions.
PURPOSE: To offer an introduction to factorial experiments aimed at investigators trained primarily in the RCT.
METHODS: The factorial experiment is compared and contrasted with other experimental designs used commonly in intervention science to highlight where each is most efficient and appropriate.
RESULTS: Several points are made: factorial experiments make very efficient use of experimental subjects when the data are properly analyzed; a factorial experiment can have excellent statistical power even if it has relatively few subjects per experimental condition; and when conducting research to select components for inclusion in a multicomponent intervention, interactions should be studied rather than avoided.
CONCLUSIONS: Investigators in preventive medicine and related areas should begin considering factorial experiments alongside other approaches. Experimental designs should be chosen from a resource management perspective, which states that the best experimental design is the one that provides the greatest scientific benefit without exceeding available resources.
Copyright © 2014 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25092122      PMCID: PMC4171184          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.06.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  14 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review and mixed treatment comparison of pharmacological interventions for the treatment of obesity.

Authors:  L J Gray; N Cooper; A Dunkley; F C Warren; R Ara; K Abrams; M J Davies; K Khunti; A Sutton
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 9.213

Review 2.  Multilevel factorial experiments for developing behavioral interventions: power, sample size, and resource considerations.

Authors:  John J Dziak; Inbal Nahum-Shani; Linda M Collins
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-02-06

3.  Questions about quitting (Q2): design and methods of a Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) randomized screening experiment for an online, motivational smoking cessation intervention.

Authors:  J B McClure; H Derry; K R Riggs; E W Westbrook; J St John; S M Shortreed; A Bogart; L C An
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) and the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): new methods for more potent eHealth interventions.

Authors:  Linda M Collins; Susan A Murphy; Victor Strecher
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Web-based smoking-cessation programs: results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Victor J Strecher; Jennifer B McClure; Gwen L Alexander; Bibhas Chakraborty; Vijay N Nair; Janine M Konkel; Sarah M Greene; Linda M Collins; Carola C Carlier; Cheryl J Wiese; Roderick J Little; Cynthia S Pomerleau; Ovide F Pomerleau
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Overweight and obesity prevention for adolescents: a cluster randomized controlled trial in a school setting.

Authors:  Emilie Bonsergent; Nelly Agrinier; Nathalie Thilly; Sabrina Tessier; Karine Legrand; Edith Lecomte; Evelyne Aptel; Serge Hercberg; Jean-François Collin; Serge Briançon
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Translational Research in South Africa: Evaluating Implementation Quality Using a Factorial Design.

Authors:  Linda L Caldwell; Edward A Smith; Linda M Collins; John W Graham; Mary Lai; Lisa Wegner; Tania Vergnani; Catherine Matthews; Joachim Jacobs
Journal:  Child Youth Care Forum       Date:  2012-04-01

Review 8.  Effectiveness of primary care-relevant treatments for obesity in adults: a systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Erin S Leblanc; Elizabeth O'Connor; Evelyn P Whitlock; Carrie D Patnode; Tanya Kapka
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  The multiphase optimization strategy for engineering effective tobacco use interventions.

Authors:  Linda M Collins; Timothy B Baker; Robin J Mermelstein; Megan E Piper; Douglas E Jorenby; Stevens S Smith; Bruce A Christiansen; Tanya R Schlam; Jessica W Cook; Michael C Fiore
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2011-04

10.  Developing multicomponent interventions using fractional factorial designs.

Authors:  Bibhas Chakraborty; Linda M Collins; Victor J Strecher; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  102 in total

1.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Optimized Smoking Treatment Delivered in Primary Care.

Authors:  Megan E Piper; Jessica W Cook; Tanya R Schlam; Douglas E Jorenby; Stevens S Smith; Linda M Collins; Robin Mermelstein; David Fraser; Michael C Fiore; Timothy B Baker
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2018-09-13

2.  Treatment seeking as a mechanism of change in a randomized controlled trial of a mobile health intervention to support recovery from alcohol use disorders.

Authors:  Joseph E Glass; James R McKay; David H Gustafson; Rachel Kornfield; Paul J Rathouz; Fiona M McTavish; Amy K Atwood; Andrew Isham; Andrew Quanbeck; Dhavan Shah
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2017-03-30

3.  Corrigendum to "Optimization of remotely delivered intensive lifestyle treatment for obesity using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy: Opt-IN study protocol" [Contemp. Clin. Trials 38 (2014) 251-259].

Authors:  Christine A Pellegrini; Sara A Hoffman; Linda M Collins; Bonnie Spring
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-11-29       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Shooting for the bull's eye in septic shock.

Authors:  Kay Choong See; Tow Keang Lim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Adapting Evaluations of Alternative Payment Models to a Changing Environment.

Authors:  Thomas W Grannemann; Randall S Brown
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  A smartphone "app"-delivered randomized factorial trial targeting physical activity in adults.

Authors:  Jason Fanning; Sarah Roberts; Charles H Hillman; Sean P Mullen; Lee Ritterband; Edward McAuley
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-03-02

7.  Randomization procedures for multicomponent behavioral intervention factorial trials in the multiphase optimization strategy framework: challenges and recommendations.

Authors:  John A Gallis; Gary G Bennett; Dori M Steinberg; Sandy Askew; Elizabeth L Turner
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Developing Optimized Adaptive Interventions in Education.

Authors:  Daniel Almirall; Connie Kasari; Daniel F McCaffrey; Inbal Nahum-Shani
Journal:  J Res Educ Eff       Date:  2017-11-29

9.  Toward Usable Evidence: Optimizing Knowledge Accumulation in HCI Research on Health Behavior Change.

Authors:  Predrag Klasnja; Eric B Hekler; Elizabeth V Korinek; John Harlow; Sonali R Mishra
Journal:  Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst       Date:  2017-05

10.  Assessing the Effects of Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Behavior Change Strategies on Physical Activity in Older Adults: a Factorial Experiment.

Authors:  Siobhan K McMahon; Beth Lewis; J Michael Oakes; Jean F Wyman; Weihua Guan; Alexander J Rothman
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2017-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.