Literature DB >> 26581875

Oculomotor selection underlies feature retention in visual working memory.

Nina M Hanning1, Donatas Jonikaitis2, Heiner Deubel2, Martin Szinte2.   

Abstract

Oculomotor selection, spatial task relevance, and visual working memory (WM) are described as three processes highly intertwined and sustained by similar cortical structures. However, because task-relevant locations always constitute potential saccade targets, no study so far has been able to distinguish between oculomotor selection and spatial task relevance. We designed an experiment that allowed us to dissociate in humans the contribution of task relevance, oculomotor selection, and oculomotor execution to the retention of feature representations in WM. We report that task relevance and oculomotor selection lead to dissociable effects on feature WM maintenance. In a first task, in which an object's location was encoded as a saccade target, its feature representations were successfully maintained in WM, whereas they declined at nonsaccade target locations. Likewise, we observed a similar WM benefit at the target of saccades that were prepared but never executed. In a second task, when an object's location was marked as task relevant but constituted a nonsaccade target (a location to avoid), feature representations maintained at that location did not benefit. Combined, our results demonstrate that oculomotor selection is consistently associated with WM, whereas task relevance is not. This provides evidence for an overlapping circuitry serving saccade target selection and feature-based WM that can be dissociated from processes encoding task-relevant locations.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  saccade; task relevance; visual feature; working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26581875     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00927.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  13 in total

1.  Visuospatial Working Memory as a Fundamental Component of the Eye Movement System.

Authors:  Stefan Van der Stigchel; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-03-20

2.  Dissociable Contribution of Extrastriate Responses to Representational Enhancement of Gaze Targets.

Authors:  Yaser Merrikhi; Mohammad Shams-Ahmar; Hamid Karimi-Rouzbahani; Kelsey Clark; Reza Ebrahimpour; Behrad Noudoost
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.420

3.  Spatial working memory alters the efficacy of input to visual cortex.

Authors:  Yaser Merrikhi; Kelsey Clark; Eddy Albarran; Mohammadbagher Parsa; Marc Zirnsak; Tirin Moore; Behrad Noudoost
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Independent Effects of Eye and Hand Movements on Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  Nina M Hanning; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-17

5.  Transsaccadic integration benefits are not limited to the saccade target.

Authors:  Emma E M Stewart; Alexander C Schütz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  On-item fixations during serial encoding do not affect spatial working memory.

Authors:  Stefan Czoschke; Sebastian Henschke; Elke B Lange
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Modulations of foveal vision associated with microsaccade preparation.

Authors:  Natalya Shelchkova; Martina Poletti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Visual working memory and action: Functional links and bi-directional influences.

Authors:  Freek van Ede
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2020-05-12

9.  Prioritized verbal working memory content biases ongoing action.

Authors:  Jacob A Miller; Anastasia Kiyonaga; Richard B Ivry; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Goal-directed and stimulus-driven selection of internal representations.

Authors:  Freek van Ede; Alexander G Board; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.