Literature DB >> 26581504

Does impulsivity change rate dependently following stimulant administration? A translational selective review and re-analysis.

W K Bickel1,2, A J Quisenberry3, S E Snider3.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Rate dependence refers to an orderly relationship between a baseline measure of behavior and the change in that behavior following an intervention. The most frequently observed rate-dependent effect is an inverse relationship between the baseline rate of behavior and response rates following an intervention. A previous report of rate dependence in delay discounting suggests that the discounting of delayed reinforcers, and perhaps, other impulsivity measures, may change rate dependently following acute and chronic administration of potentially therapeutic medications in both preclinical and clinical studies.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current paper was to review the effects of stimulants on delay discounting and other impulsivity tasks.
METHODS: All studies identified from the literature were required to include (1) an objective measure of impulsivity; (2) administration of amphetamine, methylphenidate, or modafinil; (3) presentation of a pre- and postdrug administration impulsivity measure; and (4) the report of individual drug effects or results in groups split by baseline or vehicle impulsivity. Twenty-five research reports were then reanalyzed for evidence consistent with rate dependence.
RESULTS: Of the total possible instances, 67 % produced results consistent with rate dependence. Specifically, 72, 45, and 80 % of the data sets were consistent with rate dependence following amphetamine, methylphenidate, and modafinil administration, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that rate dependence is a more robust phenomenon than reported in the literature. Impulsivity studies should consider this quantitative signature as a process to determine the effects of variables and as a potential prognostic tool to evaluate the effectiveness of future interventions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Addiction; Amphetamine; Impulsivity; Methylphenidate; Modafinil; Psychostimulants; Rate dependence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26581504      PMCID: PMC4703435          DOI: 10.1007/s00213-015-4148-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  53 in total

Review 1.  Baseline-dependency of nicotine effects: a review.

Authors:  K A Perkins
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.293

2.  A power primer.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 3.  The behavioral- and neuro-economic process of temporal discounting: A candidate behavioral marker of addiction.

Authors:  Warren K Bickel; Mikhail N Koffarnus; Lara Moody; A George Wilson
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 5.250

4.  Selective effects of methylphenidate in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a functional magnetic resonance study.

Authors:  C J Vaidya; G Austin; G Kirkorian; H W Ridlehuber; J E Desmond; G H Glover; J D Gabrieli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Effects of the atypical stimulant modafinil on a brief gambling episode in pathological gamblers with high vs. low impulsivity.

Authors:  M Zack; C X Poulos
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 4.153

6.  Disparate cocaine-induced locomotion as a predictor of choice behavior in rats trained in a delay-discounting task.

Authors:  Jessica J Stanis; Randi M Burns; Luke K Sherrill; Joshua M Gulley
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 7.  Dopamine vs noradrenaline: inverted-U effects and ADHD theories.

Authors:  Florence Levy
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.744

8.  Impulsive action in the 5-choice serial reaction time test in 5-HT₂c receptor null mutant mice.

Authors:  Paul J Fletcher; Ashlie D Soko; Guy A Higgins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Differential effects of modafinil and methylphenidate on stop-signal reaction time task performance in the rat, and interactions with the dopamine receptor antagonist cis-flupenthixol.

Authors:  Dawn M Eagle; Miles R A Tufft; Hannah L Goodchild; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-02-03       Impact factor: 4.415

10.  Performance deficits of NK1 receptor knockout mice in the 5-choice serial reaction-time task: effects of d-amphetamine, stress and time of day.

Authors:  Ting Carrie Yan; Julia A Dudley; Ruth K Weir; Ewelina M Grabowska; Yolanda Peña-Oliver; Tamzin L Ripley; Stephen P Hunt; David N Stephens; S Clare Stanford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  15 in total

1.  The Return of Rate Dependence.

Authors:  Amanda J Quisenberry; Sarah E Snider; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Behav Anal (Wash D C)       Date:  2016-11

Review 2.  Pharmacotherapies for decreasing maladaptive choice in drug addiction: Targeting the behavior and the drug.

Authors:  Frank N Perkins; Kevin B Freeman
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.533

3.  Working Memory Training Improves Alcohol Users' Episodic Future Thinking: A Rate-Dependent Analysis.

Authors:  Sarah E Snider; Harshawardhan U Deshpande; Jonathan M Lisinski; Mikhail N Koffarnus; Stephen M LaConte; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-11-21

4.  Novel Therapeutics for Addiction: Behavioral and Neuroeconomic Approaches.

Authors:  Warren K Bickel; Alexandra M Mellis; Sarah E Snider; Lara Moody; Jeffrey S Stein; Amanda J Quisenberry
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Psychiatry       Date:  2016-07-02

5.  Improvement of attention with amphetamine in low- and high-performing rats.

Authors:  Karly M Turner; Thomas H J Burne
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Some current dimensions of the behavioral economics of health-related behavior change.

Authors:  Warren K Bickel; Lara Moody; Stephen T Higgins
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 7.  Order in the absence of an effect: Identifying rate-dependent relationships.

Authors:  Sarah E Snider; Amanda J Quisenberry; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Effects of neuromodulation on cognitive performance in individuals exhibiting addictive behaviors: A systematic review.

Authors:  Katherine R Naish; Lana Vedelago; James MacKillop; Michael Amlung
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Reward-enhancing effects of d-amphetamine and its interactions with nicotine were greater in female rats and persisted across schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  Kathleen R McNealy; Margaret E Ramsay; Scott T Barrett; Rick A Bevins
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 2.277

10.  Rejecting impulsivity as a psychological construct: A theoretical, empirical, and sociocultural argument.

Authors:  Justin C Strickland; Matthew W Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 8.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.