BACKGROUND: Episodic thinking, whether past or future, uses similar neural machinery, and individuals with alcohol dependence have clear challenges with both. Moreover, alcohol-dependent individuals' narrowed temporal window likely gives rise to greater valuation of immediate rewards. We aimed to strengthen working memory (WM) in alcohol-dependent individuals and measure performance on near-transfer (novel WM) and far-transfer delay discounting (DD) tasks, including episodic future thinking (EFT) performance. Importantly, heterogeneous intervention responses could obscure a treatment effect due to individuals' baseline differences. Therefore, we considered WM, DD, and EFT DD scores using rate-dependent analyses. METHODS: A total of 50 alcohol-dependent individuals received either 20 active (Trained) or sham (Control) WM training sessions using the Cogmed adaptive WM training program. Participants completed a near-transfer novel WM task and far-transfer DD and EFT DD tasks before and after training. RESULTS: Active WM training improved performance on the near-transfer task. As determined by Oldham's correlation [rmean(x,y),y-x], initially low near-transfer task scores improved more than initially high scores (i.e., rate dependence) in the Trained group only. Moreover, Trained group individuals with the highest rates of EFT DD at baseline rate-dependently decreased following training, whereas WM training had no effect on DD alone. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the notion that WM training improves near-transfer task performance and may enhance the effects of EFT DD in a subset of alcohol-dependent individuals trapped within the narrowest temporal window. Rate-dependent changes highlight that we should attend to baseline performance to better identify individuals who would most benefit from an intervention.
BACKGROUND:Episodic thinking, whether past or future, uses similar neural machinery, and individuals with alcohol dependence have clear challenges with both. Moreover, alcohol-dependent individuals' narrowed temporal window likely gives rise to greater valuation of immediate rewards. We aimed to strengthen working memory (WM) in alcohol-dependent individuals and measure performance on near-transfer (novel WM) and far-transfer delay discounting (DD) tasks, including episodic future thinking (EFT) performance. Importantly, heterogeneous intervention responses could obscure a treatment effect due to individuals' baseline differences. Therefore, we considered WM, DD, and EFT DD scores using rate-dependent analyses. METHODS: A total of 50 alcohol-dependent individuals received either 20 active (Trained) or sham (Control) WM training sessions using the Cogmed adaptive WM training program. Participants completed a near-transfer novel WM task and far-transfer DD and EFT DD tasks before and after training. RESULTS: Active WM training improved performance on the near-transfer task. As determined by Oldham's correlation [rmean(x,y),y-x], initially low near-transfer task scores improved more than initially high scores (i.e., rate dependence) in the Trained group only. Moreover, Trained group individuals with the highest rates of EFT DD at baseline rate-dependently decreased following training, whereas WM training had no effect on DD alone. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the notion that WM training improves near-transfer task performance and may enhance the effects of EFT DD in a subset of alcohol-dependent individuals trapped within the narrowest temporal window. Rate-dependent changes highlight that we should attend to baseline performance to better identify individuals who would most benefit from an intervention.
Authors: Edmund J S Sonuga-Barke; Daniel Brandeis; Samuele Cortese; David Daley; Maite Ferrin; Martin Holtmann; Jim Stevenson; Marina Danckaerts; Saskia van der Oord; Manfred Döpfner; Ralf W Dittmann; Emily Simonoff; Alessandro Zuddas; Tobias Banaschewski; Jan Buitelaar; David Coghill; Chris Hollis; Eric Konofal; Michel Lecendreux; Ian C K Wong; Joseph Sergeant Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Daniel L Schacter; Donna Rose Addis; Demis Hassabis; Victoria C Martin; R Nathan Spreng; Karl K Szpunar Journal: Neuron Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Antoine Bechara; Kent C Berridge; Warren K Bickel; Jose A Morón; Sidney B Williams; Jeffrey S Stein Journal: Psychol Sci Public Interest Date: 2019-10
Authors: Benjamin Rolland; Fabien D'Hondt; Solène Montègue; Mélanie Brion; Eric Peyron; Julia D'Aviau de Ternay; Philippe de Timary; Mikaïl Nourredine; Pierre Maurage Journal: Neuropsychol Rev Date: 2019-01-03 Impact factor: 7.444
Authors: Rachel L Gunn; Kyle R Gerst; Elizabeth A Wiemers; Thomas S Redick; Peter R Finn Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Alexandra M Mellis; Sarah E Snider; Harshawardhan U Deshpande; Stephen M LaConte; Warren K Bickel Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-08-26 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Jeffrey S Stein; William H Craft; Rocco A Paluch; Kirstin M Gatchalian; Mark H Greenawald; Teresa Quattrin; Lucy D Mastrandrea; Leonard H Epstein; Warren K Bickel Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2020-09-28