| Literature DB >> 26581396 |
Jorge A Torreão1,2, Barbara M Ianni3, Charles Mady4, Evandro Naia5, Carlos H Rassi6, Cesar Nomura7, José R Parga8, Luis F Avila9, José A F Ramires10, Roberto Kalil-Filho11, Carlos E Rochitte12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chagas' heart disease is an important public health problem in South America. Several aspects of the pathogenesis are not fully understood, especially in its subclinical phases. On pathology Chagas' heart disease is characterized by chronic myocardial inflammation and extensive myocardial fibrosis. The latter has also been demonstrated by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). In three clinical phases of this disease, we sought to investigate the presence of LGE, myocardial increase in signal intensity in T2-weighted images (T2W) and in T1-weighted myocardial early gadolinium enhancement (MEGE), previously described CMR surrogates for myocardial fibrosis, myocardial edema and hyperemia, respectively.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26581396 PMCID: PMC4652401 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-015-0200-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ISSN: 1097-6647 Impact factor: 5.364
Demographic characteristics, clinical and functional assessment by CMR
| Clinical phases | Total |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indeterminate | CPND | CPD | |||
| (n = 16) | (n = 17) | (n = 21) | (n = 54) | ||
| Age | 57.8 ± 11.9 | 54.3 ± 10.3 | 54.7 ± 11.3 | 55.5 ± 11.1 | 0.61 |
| Male | 3 (18.7 %) | 7 (41.1 %) | 16 (76.1 %) | 26 (48.1 %) | 0.02 |
| FC NYHA = I | 16 (100 %) | 14 (82.4 %) | 1 (4.8 %) | 31 (57.4 %) | <0.001 |
| FC NYHA > I | 0 (0) | 3 (17.6 %) | 20 (95.2 %) | 23 (42.6 %) | <0.001 |
| RVEDVi (ml/m2) | 67.7 ± 14.9 | 70.4 ± 12.2 | 78.0 ± 22.7 | 72.6 ± 18.0 | 0.19 |
| RVESVi (ml/m2) | 25.9a ± 5.6 | 32.0 ± 9.1 | 40.8a ± 21.7 | 33.6 ± 15.8 | 0.01 |
| RVEF (%) | 60.9a ± 7.1 | 54.7 ± 7.9 | 49.2a ± 12.8 | 54.4 ± 10.9 | 0.04 |
| LVEDVi (ml/m2) | 72.0a ± 15.4 | 84.6b ± 22.7 | 137.0a, b ± 44.0 | 101.4 ± 42.6 | <0.001 |
| LVESVi (ml/m2) | 24.9a ± 6.3 | 39.7b ± 19.5 | 90.4a, b ± 42.3 | 55.0 ± 40.6 | <0.001 |
| LVEF (%) | 65.0a ± 5.7 | 54.0a ± 12.0 | 35.8a ± 10.8 | 50.2 ± 15.8 | <0.001 |
| Mass index(g/m2) | 55.2a ± 10.5 | 70.9 ± 15.8 | 82.2a ± 27.6 | 70.6 ± 22.8 | 0.01 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD for numeric variables or absolute and relative frequencies (%) for categorical variables
CPND cardiac phase without left ventricular systolic dysfunction, CPD cardiac phase with left ventricular systolic dysfunctional. LV left ventricle, EF ejection fraction, EDV end-diastolic volume, ESV end-systolic volume, RV right ventricle. FC functional class, NYHA New York Heart Association
Difference by post hoc analysis (a, b)
LGE and T2W among clinical and functional characteristics
| LGE |
| T2W |
| Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | No | Yes | ||||
| (n = 15) | (n = 39) | (n = 14) | (n = 40) | (n = 54) | |||
| Age | 57.6 ± 11.9 | 54.6 ± 10.7 | NS | 58.1 ± 12.7 | 54.6 ± 10.5 | NS | 55.5 ± 11.1 |
| LVEDVi (ml/m2) | 23.9 ± 6.1 | 68.1 ± 41.9 | <0.001 | 24.1 ± 6.4 | 65.9 ± 42.0 | <0.001 | 55.0 ± 40.6 |
| LVEF (%) | 66.4 ± 5.1 | 43.3 ± 13.5 | <0.001 | 66.7 ± 4.7 | 44.4 ± 14.1 | <0.001 | 50.2 ± 15.8 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD for numeric variables or absolute and relative frequencies (%) for categorical variables
LVEF left ventricle ejection fraction, LVIEDV Left ventricle indexed end-diastolic volume, FC functional class, NYHA New York Heart Association
Presence of LGE, TW2 and MEGE among clinical classification, FC NYHA, gender, LVFE and LVEDVi categories
| LGE | TW2 | MEGE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IND | (n = 16) | (n = 16) | (n = 12) |
| 2 (12,5 %) | 3 (18.8 %) | 3 (25 %) | |
| Mass (g): 0,85 ± 2,47a | Segments: 0.31 ± 0.87 a, b | ||
| CPND | (n = 17) | (n = 17) | (n = 13) |
| 16 (94,1 %) | 16 (94,1 %) | 12 (92.3 %) | |
| Mass (g): 13.00 ± 10.8 a | Segments: 3.24 ± 2.3 a | ||
| CPD | (n = 21) | (n = 21) | (n = 17) |
| 21 (100 %) | 21 (100 %) | 16 (94.1 %) | |
| Mass (g): 25.00 ± 11.9 a | Segments: 3.67 ± 1.82 b | ||
|
| <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| LVEF > 55 % | (n = 24) | (n = 24) | (n = 19) |
| 9 (37.5 %) | 10 (41.7 %) | 8 (42,1 %) | |
| Mass (g): 2.62 g ± 4.19 a | Segments: 0.92 ± 1.3 a, b | ||
| LVEF =30-55 % | (n = 18) | (n = 18) | (n = 17) |
| 18 (100 %) | 18 (100 %) | 16 (94,1 %) | |
| Mass (g): 19.60 g ± 11.6 a | Segments: 3.94 ± 2.2a | ||
| LVEF < 30 % | (n = 12) | (n = 12) | (n = 6) |
| 12 (100 %) | 12 (100 %) | 6 (100 %) | |
| Mass (g): 29.00 g ± 10.8 a | Segments: 3.67 ± 1.8 b | ||
|
| <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| LVEDVi < 85 | (n = 22) | (n = 22) | (n = 17) |
| 10 (45.5 %) | 12 (54.5 %) | 9 (52,9 %) | |
| LVEDVi = 85-135 ml/m2 | (n = 20) | (n = 20) | (n = 19) |
| 17 (85.0 %) | 16 (80.0 %) | 16 (84,2 %) | |
| LVEDVi > 135 ml/m2 | (n = 12) | (n = 12) | (n = 6) |
| 12 (100 %) | 12 (100 %) | 6 (100 %) | |
|
| <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| NYHA FC = 1 | (n = 31) | (n = 31) | (n = 25) |
| 16 (51,6 %) | 17 (54,8 %) | 15 (60,0 %) | |
| NYHA FC > 1 | (n = 23) | (n = 23) | (n = 17) |
| 23 (100 %) | 23 (100 %) | 16 (94,1 %) | |
|
| <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Male | (n = 26) | (n = 26) | (n = 19) |
| 23 (88,4 %) | 23 (88,4) | 17 (89,4 %) | |
| Female | (n = 28) | (n = 28) | (n = 23) |
| 16 (57.1 %) | 17 (60.7 %) | 14 (60.8 %) | |
|
| <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Total | (N = 54) | (N = 54) | (N = 42) |
| 39 (72.2 %) | 40 (74.0 %) | 31 (73,8 %) |
Data are expressed in absolute and relative (%) frequency
LGE Late Gadolinium Enhancement image, TW2 T2 weighted image, MEGE Myocardial Early Gadolinium Enhancement image, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEDVi Left ventricle indexed end-diastolic volume, IND Indeterminate, CPND Cardiac phase without left ventricular systolic dysfunction, CPD Cardiac phase with left ventricular systolic dysfunctional, FC Functional class, NYHA New York Heart Association
Difference by post hoc analysis (a, b)
Fig. 1Apical (a), mid (b) and basal (c) short-axis images of a Chagas’ heart disease patient in the indeterminate phase (patient 54, IND) with T2w (left column), cine SSFP for anatomical reference (mid column) and LGE (right column). Red arrows indicate increased myocardial signal intensity (T2W Ratio: 2.5). On the apical short-axis slice one can see a positive T2w image without correspondent LGE
Fig. 2Short-axis images of a Chagas’ heart disease patient in the cardiac phase without LV dysfunction (patient 15, CPND). LGE (right) and T2 weighted (left) images with increased regional myocardial signal intensity on both techniques (T2W Ratio: 2.6)
Fig. 3Mid (a) and basal (b) short-axis images of a Chagas’ heart disease patient in the cardiac phase with LV dysfunction (patient 24, CPD). LGE (right) and T2 weighted (left) images with increased regional myocardial signal intensity on both techniques (T2W Ratio: 2.4)
Fig. 4MEGE evaluation. Example of a negative case, pre contrast (a) and post contrast (b). Example of a positive case, pre contrast (c) and post contrast (d)
Fig. 5Association of segments with LGE and T2W positive, using the AHA segmentation model. Data are expressed as absolute frequency
Fig. 6LV segmental dysfunction distribution based on the presence or absence of myocardial abnormalities. The presence of T2W increased the chance of segmental dysfunction in the absence of myocardial fibrosis
Fig. 7Correlation between segments with LGE and segments with T2W image
Fig. 8Correlation between mass of LGE and segments with T2W image