Literature DB >> 26266514

Residue-Specific Force Field (RSFF2) Improves the Modeling of Conformational Behavior of Peptides and Proteins.

Shuxiang Li1, Adrian H Elcock1.   

Abstract

A recent report of (3)J(HNHα) scalar coupling constants for hundreds of two-residue peptides has provided an important opportunity to test simulation force fields for proteins. Here, we compare the abilities of three derivatives of the Amber ff99SB force field to reproduce these data. We report molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of 256 two-residue peptides and show that the recently developed residue-specific force field (RSFF2) produces a dramatic improvement in the agreement with experimental (3)J(HNHα) coupling constants. We further show that RSFF2 also appears to produce a modest improvement in reproducing the (3)J(HNHα) coupling constants of five model proteins. Perhaps surprisingly, an analysis of neighboring residue effects (NREs) on the (3)J(HNHα) coupling constants of the two-residue peptides indicates little difference between the force fields' abilities to reproduce experimental NREs. We speculate that this might indicate limitations in the force fields' descriptions of nonbonded interactions between adjacent side chains or with terminal capping groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  J-coupling constants; Karplus equation; MD simulation; NMR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26266514      PMCID: PMC4657862          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett        ISSN: 1948-7185            Impact factor:   6.475


  25 in total

1.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters.

Authors:  Viktor Hornak; Robert Abel; Asim Okur; Bentley Strockbine; Adrian Roitberg; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-11-15

2.  Limits on variations in protein backbone dynamics from precise measurements of scalar couplings.

Authors:  Beat Vögeli; Jinfa Ying; Alexander Grishaev; Ad Bax
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Force field bias in protein folding simulations.

Authors:  Peter L Freddolino; Sanghyun Park; Benoît Roux; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Biomolecular simulation: a computational microscope for molecular biology.

Authors:  Ron O Dror; Robert M Dirks; J P Grossman; Huafeng Xu; David E Shaw
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 12.981

Review 5.  Assessing the accuracy of physical models used in protein-folding simulations: quantitative evidence from long molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Stefano Piana; John L Klepeis; David E Shaw
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 6.809

6.  Neighboring residue effects in terminally blocked dipeptides: implications for residual secondary structures in intrinsically unfolded/disordered proteins.

Authors:  Young-Sang Jung; Kwang-Im Oh; Geum-Sook Hwang; Minhaeng Cho
Journal:  Chirality       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.437

7.  Structure and dynamics of the homologous series of alanine peptides: a joint molecular dynamics/NMR study.

Authors:  Jürgen Graf; Phuong H Nguyen; Gerhard Stock; Harald Schwalbe
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Are Protein Force Fields Getting Better? A Systematic Benchmark on 524 Diverse NMR Measurements.

Authors:  Kyle A Beauchamp; Yu-Shan Lin; Rhiju Das; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Stefano Piana; Kim Palmo; Paul Maragakis; John L Klepeis; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-06

10.  Systematic validation of protein force fields against experimental data.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Paul Maragakis; Stefano Piana; Michael P Eastwood; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Transient β-hairpin formation in α-synuclein monomer revealed by coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulation.

Authors:  Hang Yu; Wei Han; Wen Ma; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Osmotic Pressure Simulations of Amino Acids and Peptides Highlight Potential Routes to Protein Force Field Parameterization.

Authors:  Mark S Miller; Wesley K Lay; Adrian H Elcock
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Evolution of All-Atom Protein Force Fields to Improve Local and Global Properties.

Authors:  Gül H Zerze; Wenwei Zheng; Robert B Best; Jeetain Mittal
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 6.475

4.  Protein dynamics and structural waters in bromodomains.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Zhang; Kai Chen; Yun-Dong Wu; Olaf Wiest
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The conformational and mutational landscape of the ubiquitin-like marker for autophagosome formation in cancer.

Authors:  Burcu Aykac Fas; Emiliano Maiani; Valentina Sora; Mukesh Kumar; Maliha Mashkoor; Matteo Lambrughi; Matteo Tiberti; Elena Papaleo
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 16.016

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.