| Literature DB >> 26579104 |
Asmine Bastardo1, Carmen Ravelo2, Jesús L Romalde3.
Abstract
Phylogeographic patterns and population genetic structure of Yersinia ruckeri, the pathological agent of enteric redmouth disease (ERM) in salmonids, were investigated on the basis of concatenated multiloci sequences from isolates of different phenotypes obtained between 1965 and 2009 from diverse areas and hosts. Sequence analyses revealed genetic differentiation among subpopulations with the largest genetic distance occurring between subpopulations of Europe and Canada and/or South America. Bayesian analysis indicated the presence of three ancestral population clusters. Mismatch distribution displayed signatures characteristic of changes in size due to demographic and spatial expansions in the overall Y. ruckeri population, and also in the geographically separate subpopulations. Furthermore, a weak signal of isolation by distance was determined. A significant positive correlation between genetic and geographical distances was observed. These results revealed that the population of Y. ruckeri has undergone both ancient and recent population changes that were probably induced by biogeography forces in the past and, much more recently, by adaptive processes forced by aquaculture expansion. These findings have important implications for future studies on Y. ruckeri population dynamics, on the potential role of genetic structure to explain variations in ERM transmission, and on the effect of past evolutionary events on current estimations of gene flow.Entities:
Keywords: Bayesian analysis; Yersinia ruckeri; aquaculture; genetic structure; phylogeography; population changes
Year: 2015 PMID: 26579104 PMCID: PMC4625090 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01198
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Summary information of .
| CA | Canada (5) | ST5, ST15, ST21, ST24, ST25 | BT1 (5) | O1a, O1b, O2a, O2b, O4 | 1965–1980 | |
| FN | Finland (3) Norway | ST 2 (2), ST 3, ST 17 | BT1 (2) BT2 (2) | O1a (3), O1b | 1985–2009 | |
| DG | Denmark (4) Germany | ST1, ST20, ST22, ST23, ST25 | BT1 (5) | O1a (2), O2a, O2b (2) | 1983–1989 | |
| UK | United Kingdom (8) | ST1 (4), ST2, ST13, ST14, ST30 | BT1 (3) BT2 (5) | O1a (6), O1b, O2b | 1995–2007 | |
| PO | Portugal (21) | ST2 (14), ST3 (3), ST8, ST19, ST26 (2) | BT1 (7) BT2 (14) | O1a (17), O3 (4) | 1994–2006 | |
| SF | Spain (4) France | ST2 (4), ST23 | BT1 (5) | O1a (4), O2b | 1980–2002 | |
| PE | Peru (27) | ST1 (7), ST2 (14), ST9 (2), ST10, ST11, ST12, ST28 | BT1 (22) BT2 (5) | O1a | 2008 | |
| CH | Chile (11) | ST1 (2), ST7 (8), ST8 | BT1 (11) | O1a (2), O1b (8), O2b | 2008 | |
| US | United States (17) | ST1, ST2 (10), ST4, ST6, ST14, ST16 (3), | BT1 (7) BT2 (10) | O1a (4), O1b (10), O2b, O3, O4 | 1965–2006 |
When more than one, number of isolates is indicated in brackets.
Established by Bastardo et al. (2012). Each ST corresponds to one haplotype in this study.
Host species: Oncorhynchus mykiss, Ondatra zibethica, Salvelinus malma, Salmo salar, Salmo trutta, Anguilla anguilla, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha.
Figure 1Median-joining network of . Colors indicate the different geographic area. Circles represent each haplotype (HT). A line between haplotypes represent one mutational step. Numbers on the lines indicate the number of mutational steps greater than one. Open circles represents haplotypes not present in the sample. Radius of the circle is proportional to the number of sequences.
Statistics of genetic variation observed within the 9 populations of .
| Overall | 103 | 30 | 2.671 ± 0.89 | 0.79 ± 0.03 | 0.0010 ± 0.0002 | −2.286 | 0.056 | −20.646 | 1.00 | −6.145 | −5.484 |
| CA | 5 | 5 | 4.800 ± 2.81 | 1.00 ± 0.12 | 0.0017 ± 0.0011 | 0.789 | 0.131 | −1.411 | 1.00 | 0.298 | 0.251 |
| FN | 4 | 3 | 3.000 ± 1.96 | 0.83 ± 0.22 | 0.0011 ± 0.0008 | −0.808 | 0.471 | 0.731 | 0.77 | −0.808 | −0.777 |
| DG | 5 | 5 | 4.800 ± 2.81 | 1.00 ± 0.12 | 0.0017 ± 0.0011 | 0.789 | 0.195 | −1.411 | 1.00 | 0.789 | 0.830 |
| UK | 8 | 5 | 1.964 ± 1.23 | 0.78 ± 0.15 | 0.0007 ± 0.0005 | −0.704 | 0.191 | −1.191 | 0.93 | −0.721 | −0.792 |
| PO | 21 | 5 | 4.380 ± 2.25 | 0.54 ± 0.11 | 0.0016 ± 0.0009 | −2.037 | 0.175 | 3.528 | 0.08 | −3.377 | −3.479 |
| SF | 5 | 3 | 1.200 ± 0.90 | 0.70 ± 0.21 | 0.0004 ± 0.0003 | −1.048 | 0.433 | −0.186 | 0.87 | −1.048 | −1.051 |
| PE | 27 | 7 | 1.059 ± 0.72 | 0.65 ± 0.08 | 0.0004 ± 0.0002 | −0.935 | 0.098 | −2.719 | 0.98 | −1.802 | −1.799 |
| CH | 11 | 3 | 1.054 ± 0.75 | 0.47 ± 0.16 | 0.0004 ± 0.0003 | −1.464 | 0.232 | 0.694 | 0.65 | −1.444 | −1.634 |
| US | 17 | 7 | 1.352 ± 0.87 | 0.71 ± 0.10 | 0.0005 ± 0.0003 | −1.197 | 0.100 | −2.838 | 0.98 | −1.073 | −1.274 |
| Cluster I | 73 | – | – | – | −1.729 | 0.043 | −9.611 | 1.00 | −3.461 | −3.450 | |
| Cluster II | 14 | – | – | – | −0.650 | 0.122 | −1.233 | 0.92 | −0.650 | −0.965 | |
| Cluster III | 16 | – | – | – | −1.618 | 0.171 | −3.930 | 0.99 | −2.465 | −2.592 |
N, number of sequences analyzed; HT, number of haplotypes; K, average number of pairwise differences; Hd, haplotypes diversity; π, nucleotide diversity; D, Tajima's index; R2, Ramos-Onsins' test; FS, Fu's statistic; * D* and F*, Fu and Li tests; S, Strobeck's statistic.
significance at P < 0.05;
shows significance for Fu's and for Fu and Li tests at P < 0.001, and for Tajima's index at P < 0.01, respectively; Clusters I, II and III, genetic groups defined by genetic population structure analysis.
Matrix of pairwise genetic differentiation (.
| CA | – | ∞ | ∞ | 1.9 | 12.6 | 3.1 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 1.1 |
| FN | −0.1422 | – | ∞ | 5.3 | ∞ | ∞ | 1.7 | 0.6 | 4.5 |
| DG | −0.1215 | −0.1262 | – | ∞ | 27.5 | 12.5 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| UK | 0.2126 | 0.0860 | 0.0652 | – | 9.4 | 72.7 | 6.3 | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| PO | 0.0381 | −0.0938 | 0.0179 | 0.0507 | – | ∞ | 3.2 | 1.4 | 5.7 |
| SF | 0.1379 | −0.0253 | 0.0385 | 0.0068 | −0.0319 | – | 23.8 | 0.5 | 104.6 |
| PE | 0.4454 | 0.2264 | 0.3199 | 0.0729 | 0.1356 | 0.0201 | – | 0.5 | 2.7 |
| CH | 0.4212 | 0.4677 | 0.2913 | 0.2001 | 0.2538 | 0.4606 | 0.4891 | – | 0.4 |
| US | 0.3187 | 0.1006 | 0.2761 | 0.1938 | 0.0801 | 0.0047 | 0.1552 | 0.5354 | – |
Upper corner: Nm (number of migrants per generation) estimated from FST values.
Lower corner: Pairwise FST values.
Shows a significant P-value (<0.05).
Figure 2Structure analysis of 103 . Each vertical bar represents a single isolate. The height of each color represents the probability of assignment to that cluster. Subpopulations are listed at the bottom and their geographical origins as indicated in Table 1. For each plotting strains ordered by ancestry coefficients (A) and by geographic origin (B) are showed.
Figure 3Populations and subpopulations inferred in clusters I, II, and III by STRUCTURE analyses. The peak at ΔK represents the most probable number of populations and subpopulations. (A) K = 5 subpopulations identified within cluster I. (B) K = 6 subpopulations identified within cluster II, and (C) K = 8 and K = 5 subpopulations determined within the cluster III. Each vertical line in the structure bar plot represents each strain. Different colored segments on the vertical bar represent strains with mixed membership coefficient (maximum 1) to the different population, subpopulation or cluster. For each cluster, plotting ordered by geographic origin, and ancestry coefficients are showed.
Figure 4Population expansion signals in Site-frequency spectrum indicating excess of singleton mutations in sequences. Spectrum compares observed frequencies of segregating sites to expected distribution under the null hypothesis of no population change. (B) Mismatch distribution of observed frequencies of pairwise difference among concatenates sequences and expected frequencies, under neutral model of evolution given the null hypothesis of no population change, population expansion, and spatial expansion.
Results of Mismatch distribution analyses for different locations .
| Overall | 103 | 0.0802 | 0.0068 | 0.0068 | 1.10 (0.65–1.58) | 1.13 (0.67–0.12) |
| CA | 5 | 0.0870 | 0.0870 | 0.2800 | 4.93 (1.56–7.73) | 4.93 (1.27–7.45) |
| FN | 4 | 0.3278 | 0.3137 | 0.9722 | 3.45 (0.89–6.11) | 3.47 (0.67–69) |
| DG | 5 | 0.0393 | 0.0393 | 0.1200 | 2.74 (0.77–7.98) | 2.73 (0.91–8.63) |
| UK | 8 | 0.0307 | 0.0280 | 0.1300 | 2.51 (0.31–5.36) | 2.22 (0.69–5.35) |
| PO | 21 | 0.0869 | 0.0236 | 0.2291 | 5.19 (0.42–91.19) | 3.67 (0.00–9.28) |
| SF | 5 | 0.0062 | 0.0052 | 0.0050 | 1.57 (0.00–2.91) | 1.52 (0.00–3.37) |
| PE | 27 | 0.0011 | 0.0010 | 0.0471 | 1.08 (0.42–1.87) | 0.82 (0.28–2.23) |
| CH | 11 | 0.0319 | 0.0295 | 0.1743 | 0.15 (0.00–1.58) | 4.69 (0.00–124.0) |
| US | 17 | 0.0132 | 0.0138 | 0.1074 | 0.15 (0.00–1.59) | 4.69 (0.00–124.0) |
| Cluster 1 | 73 | 0.0019 | 0.0013 | 0.0557 | 1.00 (0.00–53.5) | 0.54 (0.35–2.40) |
| Cluster II | 14 | 0.0464 | 0.0355 | 0.1331 | 3.89 (0.00–6.416) | 2.61 (0.86–6.43) |
| Cluster III | 16 | 0.0091 | 0.0092 | 0.0238 | 4.44 (2.40–6.69) | 4.12 (1.89–5.73) |
N, number of sequences analyzed; r, SSD, mismatch distribution; Raggedness index; τ, divergence time;
, under demographic expansion model;
, under spatial expansion model;
significance at P < 0.05.
Figure 5Spatial analysis. (A) Moran's correlogram of individual allele frequencies. Moran's I was plotted for individual allele frequencies across 6 distance classes (black line). Significant value (black dot) of Moran's I indicate positive spatial dependence at P < 0.05 (B) Mantel test for isolation by distance. Regresion based on genetic distance (PhiFST) values among 9 subpopulations. Regresion slope = 0.0431 ± 0.005; R2 = 0.350 Mantel probability P < 0.01.