J N Graff1, G Baciarello2, A J Armstrong3, C S Higano4, P Iversen5, T W Flaig6, D Forer7, T Parli7, D Phung8, B Tombal9, T M Beer10, C N Sternberg2. 1. Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland Division of Oncology, Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, USA graffj@ohsu.edu. 2. Department of Medical Oncology, San Camillo and Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy. 3. Divisions of Medical Oncology and Urology, Duke University Medical Center and the Duke Cancer Institute, Durham. 4. Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA. 5. Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, København, Denmark. 6. Department of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora. 7. Medivation, Inc., San Francisco, USA. 8. Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., Leiden, The Netherlands. 9. Department of Urology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium. 10. Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer disproportionately affects older men. Because age affects treatment decisions, it is important to understand the efficacy and tolerability of therapies for advanced prostate cancer in elderly men. This analysis describes efficacy and safety outcomes in men aged ≥75 years who received enzalutamide, an androgen receptor inhibitor, in the phase III PREVAIL trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PREVAIL was a randomised, double-blind, multinational study of oral enzalutamide 160 mg/day (N = 872) versus placebo (N = 845) in chemotherapy-naive men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Overall survival (OS) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) were coprimary end points. Subgroup analysis of men aged ≥75 years (elderly) and men aged <75 years was pre-specified for the coprimary end points and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Among 609 elderly patients (35%) who participated in PREVAIL, median treatment duration was 16.6 and 5.0 months in the enzalutamide and placebo arms, respectively. In the elderly subgroup, OS was greater with enzalutamide than with placebo [32.4 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 27.7-not yet reached] versus 25.1 months (95% CI 22.6-28.0); hazard ratio (HR) = 0.61 (95% CI 0.47-0.79); P = 0.0001], as was rPFS [not yet reached (95% CI 12.3-not yet reached) versus 3.7 months (95% CI 3.6-5.3); HR = 0.17 (95% CI 0.12-0.24); P < 0.0001]. Irrespective of treatment assignment, incidence of AEs was similar between the two age groups, except for an overall higher incidence of falls among elderly patients than younger patients [84/609 (13.8%) versus 62/1106 (5.6%)] and among elderly patients receiving enzalutamide than those receiving placebo [61/317 (19.2%) versus 23/292 (7.9%)]. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly men benefited from treatment with enzalutamide in terms of OS and rPFS. Enzalutamide was well tolerated in the elderly subgroup and those aged <75 years. Age and enzalutamide treatment were associated with a higher incidence of falls. CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER: NCT01212991, ClinicalTrials.gov.
BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer disproportionately affects older men. Because age affects treatment decisions, it is important to understand the efficacy and tolerability of therapies for advanced prostate cancer in elderly men. This analysis describes efficacy and safety outcomes in men aged ≥75 years who received enzalutamide, an androgen receptor inhibitor, in the phase III PREVAIL trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PREVAIL was a randomised, double-blind, multinational study of oral enzalutamide 160 mg/day (N = 872) versus placebo (N = 845) in chemotherapy-naive men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Overall survival (OS) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) were coprimary end points. Subgroup analysis of men aged ≥75 years (elderly) and men aged <75 years was pre-specified for the coprimary end points and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Among 609 elderly patients (35%) who participated in PREVAIL, median treatment duration was 16.6 and 5.0 months in the enzalutamide and placebo arms, respectively. In the elderly subgroup, OS was greater with enzalutamide than with placebo [32.4 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 27.7-not yet reached] versus 25.1 months (95% CI 22.6-28.0); hazard ratio (HR) = 0.61 (95% CI 0.47-0.79); P = 0.0001], as was rPFS [not yet reached (95% CI 12.3-not yet reached) versus 3.7 months (95% CI 3.6-5.3); HR = 0.17 (95% CI 0.12-0.24); P < 0.0001]. Irrespective of treatment assignment, incidence of AEs was similar between the two age groups, except for an overall higher incidence of falls among elderly patients than younger patients [84/609 (13.8%) versus 62/1106 (5.6%)] and among elderly patients receiving enzalutamide than those receiving placebo [61/317 (19.2%) versus 23/292 (7.9%)]. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly men benefited from treatment with enzalutamide in terms of OS and rPFS. Enzalutamide was well tolerated in the elderly subgroup and those aged <75 years. Age and enzalutamide treatment were associated with a higher incidence of falls. CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER: NCT01212991, ClinicalTrials.gov.
Authors: Kerri M Winters-Stone; Esther Moe; Julie N Graff; Nathan F Dieckmann; Sydnee Stoyles; Carolyn Borsch; Joshi J Alumkal; Christopher L Amling; Tomasz M Beer Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jared C Foster; Jennifer G Le-Rademacher; Josephine L Feliciano; Ajeet Gajra; Drew K Seisler; Ronald DeMatteo; Jacqueline M Lafky; Arti Hurria; Hyman B Muss; Harvey J Cohen; Aminah Jatoi Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Kim Edmunds; Haitham Tuffaha; Daniel A Galvão; Paul Scuffham; Robert U Newton Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-01-07 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Ajeet Gajra; Tyler J Zemla; Aminah Jatoi; Josephine L Feliciano; Melisa L Wong; Hongbin Chen; Ronald Maggiore; Ryan P McMurray; Arti Hurria; Hyman B Muss; Harvey J Cohen; Jacqueline Lafky; Martin J Edelman; Rogerio Lilenbaum; Jennifer G Le-Rademacher Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2018-03-30 Impact factor: 15.609