Jared C Foster1, Jennifer G Le-Rademacher2, Josephine L Feliciano3, Ajeet Gajra4, Drew K Seisler1, Ronald DeMatteo5, Jacqueline M Lafky6, Arti Hurria7, Hyman B Muss8, Harvey J Cohen9, Aminah Jatoi1. 1. Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota. 2. Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 3. Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland. 4. State University of New York, Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, New York. 5. Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 6. Cancer Clinical Research Office, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 7. Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California. 8. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 9. Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A nocebo is an inert substance associated with adverse events. Although previous studies have examined the positive (placebo) effects of such inert substances, few have examined negative (nocebo) adverse event profiles, particularly in older patients who have higher morbidity and can experience frequent and severe adverse events from cancer therapy. METHODS: This study focused on placebo/nocebo-exposed patients who participated in 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled, cancer therapeutic studies, namely, North Central Cancer Therapy Group trial NCCTG 97-24-51 and American College of Surgeons Oncology Group trial Z9001, with the goal of reporting the comparative, age-based adverse event rates, as reported during the conduct of these trials. RESULTS: Among the 446 patients who received only placebo/nocebo and who were the focus of the current report, 161 were aged ≥65 years at the time of respective trial entry, and 5234 adverse events occurred. Unadjusted adverse event rates did not differ significantly between patients aged ≥65 years and younger patients (rate ratio, 1.01; 99% confidence interval, 0.47-2.02), and the findings were similar findings for grade 2 or worse adverse events and for all symptom-driven adverse events (for example, pain, loss of appetite, anxiety). Adjustment for sex, ethnicity, baseline performance score, and individual trial resulted in no significant age-based differences in adverse event rates. Similar findings were observed with an age threshold of 70 years. CONCLUSIONS:Adverse events are equally common in older and younger cancer patients who are exposed to nocebo and thus require the same degree of clinical consideration regardless of age. Cancer 2017;123:4193-4198.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: A nocebo is an inert substance associated with adverse events. Although previous studies have examined the positive (placebo) effects of such inert substances, few have examined negative (nocebo) adverse event profiles, particularly in older patients who have higher morbidity and can experience frequent and severe adverse events from cancer therapy. METHODS: This study focused on placebo/nocebo-exposed patients who participated in 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled, cancer therapeutic studies, namely, North Central Cancer Therapy Group trial NCCTG 97-24-51 and American College of Surgeons Oncology Group trial Z9001, with the goal of reporting the comparative, age-based adverse event rates, as reported during the conduct of these trials. RESULTS: Among the 446 patients who received only placebo/nocebo and who were the focus of the current report, 161 were aged ≥65 years at the time of respective trial entry, and 5234 adverse events occurred. Unadjusted adverse event rates did not differ significantly between patients aged ≥65 years and younger patients (rate ratio, 1.01; 99% confidence interval, 0.47-2.02), and the findings were similar findings for grade 2 or worse adverse events and for all symptom-driven adverse events (for example, pain, loss of appetite, anxiety). Adjustment for sex, ethnicity, baseline performance score, and individual trial resulted in no significant age-based differences in adverse event rates. Similar findings were observed with an age threshold of 70 years. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse events are equally common in older and younger cancerpatients who are exposed to nocebo and thus require the same degree of clinical consideration regardless of age. Cancer 2017;123:4193-4198.
Authors: Hyman Muss; Javier Cortes; Linda T Vahdat; Fatima Cardoso; Chris Twelves; Jantien Wanders; Corina E Dutcus; Jay Yang; Seth Seegobin; Joyce O'Shaughnessy Journal: Oncologist Date: 2014-03-28
Authors: Shauna L Hillman; Sumithra J Mandrekar; Brian Bot; Ronald P DeMatteo; Edith A Perez; Karla V Ballman; Heidi Nelson; Jan C Buckner; Daniel J Sargent Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-05-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Amit Mahipal; Aaron C Denson; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Richard Lush; Ambuj Kumar; Tzu-Hua Juan; Michael J Schell; Daniel M Sullivan Journal: Cancer Control Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 3.302
Authors: Tamar L Ben-Shaanan; Hilla Azulay-Debby; Tania Dubovik; Elina Starosvetsky; Ben Korin; Maya Schiller; Nathaniel L Green; Yasmin Admon; Fahed Hakim; Shai S Shen-Orr; Asya Rolls Journal: Nat Med Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Kathleen I Pritchard; Howard A Burris; Yoshinori Ito; Hope S Rugo; Shaker Dakhil; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Mario Campone; Tibor Csöszi; José Baselga; Puttisak Puttawibul; Martine Piccart; Daniel Heng; Shinzaburo Noguchi; Vichien Srimuninnimit; Hugues Bourgeois; Antonio Gonzalez Martin; Karen Osborne; Ashok Panneerselvam; Tetiana Taran; Tarek Sahmoud; Michael Gnant Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Ronald P Dematteo; Karla V Ballman; Cristina R Antonescu; Robert G Maki; Peter W T Pisters; George D Demetri; Martin E Blackstein; Charles D Blanke; Margaret von Mehren; Murray F Brennan; Shreyaskumar Patel; Martin D McCarter; Jonathan A Polikoff; Benjamin R Tan; Kouros Owzar Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-03-18 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Araba Adjei; Jan C Buckner; Elizabeth Cathcart-Rake; Hongbin Chen; Harvey J Cohen; Dyda Dao; Jo-Ellen De Luca; Josephine Feliciano; Rachel A Freedman; Richard M Goldberg; Judith Hopkins; Joleen Hubbard; Aminah Jatoi; Meghan Karuturi; Margaret Kemeny; Gretchen G Kimmick; Heidi D Klepin; Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Jacqueline M Lafky; Jennifer G Le-Rademacher; Daneng Li; Stuart M Lichtman; Ronald Maggiore; Jeanne Mandelblatt; Vicki A Morrison; Hyman B Muss; Michael O Ojelabi; Mina S Sedrak; Niveditha Subbiah; Virginia Sun; Susan Tuttle; Noam VanderWalde; Tanya Wildes; Melisa L Wong; Jennifer Woyach Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2019-06-11 Impact factor: 3.599