Lucy Holmes1, Changxing Ma2, Haiping Qiao3, Cheryl Drabik3, Colleen Hurley3, Donna Jones3, Sarah Judkiewicz3, Howard Faden4. 1. University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY; Women & Children's Hospital of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY. Electronic address: LHolmes@upa.chob.edu. 2. University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY. 3. Women & Children's Hospital of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY. 4. University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY; Women & Children's Hospital of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a 3-day vs 10-day course of antibiotics after surgical drainage of skin abscesses is associated with different failure and recurrence rates. STUDY DESIGN:Patients age 3 months to 17 years seeking care at a pediatric emergency department with an uncomplicated skin abscess that required surgical drainage were randomized to receive 3 or 10 days of oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole therapy. Patients were evaluated 10-14 days later to assess clinical outcome. Patients were followed for 6 months to determine the cumulative rate of recurrent skin infections. RESULTS: Among the 249 patients who were enrolled, 87% of wound cultures grew Staphylococcus aureus (S aureus) (55% methicillin-resistant S aureus [MRSA], 32% methicillin-sensitive S aureus), 11% other organisms, and 2% no growth. Thirteen patients experienced treatment failure. Among all patients, no significant difference in failure rates between the 3- and 10-day treatment groups was found. After we stratified patients by the infecting organism, only patients with MRSA infection were more likely to experience treatment failure in the 3-day group than the 10-day group (P = .03, rate difference 10.1%, 95% CI 2.1%-18.2%) Recurrent infection within 1 month of surgical drainage was more likely in patients infected with MRSA who received 3 days of antibiotics. (P = .046, rate difference 10.3%, 95% CI 0.8%-19.9%). CONCLUSION:Patients with MRSA skin abscesses are more likely to experience treatment failure and recurrent skin infection if given 3 rather than 10 days of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole after surgical drainage. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02024867.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a 3-day vs 10-day course of antibiotics after surgical drainage of skin abscesses is associated with different failure and recurrence rates. STUDY DESIGN:Patients age 3 months to 17 years seeking care at a pediatric emergency department with an uncomplicated skin abscess that required surgical drainage were randomized to receive 3 or 10 days of oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole therapy. Patients were evaluated 10-14 days later to assess clinical outcome. Patients were followed for 6 months to determine the cumulative rate of recurrent skin infections. RESULTS: Among the 249 patients who were enrolled, 87% of wound cultures grew Staphylococcus aureus (S aureus) (55% methicillin-resistant S aureus [MRSA], 32% methicillin-sensitive S aureus), 11% other organisms, and 2% no growth. Thirteen patients experienced treatment failure. Among all patients, no significant difference in failure rates between the 3- and 10-day treatment groups was found. After we stratified patients by the infecting organism, only patients with MRSA infection were more likely to experience treatment failure in the 3-day group than the 10-day group (P = .03, rate difference 10.1%, 95% CI 2.1%-18.2%) Recurrent infection within 1 month of surgical drainage was more likely in patients infected with MRSA who received 3 days of antibiotics. (P = .046, rate difference 10.3%, 95% CI 0.8%-19.9%). CONCLUSION:Patients with MRSA skin abscesses are more likely to experience treatment failure and recurrent skin infection if given 3 rather than 10 days of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole after surgical drainage. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02024867.
Authors: Robert S Daum; Loren G Miller; Lilly Immergluck; Stephanie Fritz; C Buddy Creech; David Young; Neha Kumar; Michele Downing; Stephanie Pettibone; Rebecca Hoagland; Samantha J Eells; Mary G Boyle; Trisha Chan Parker; Henry F Chambers Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J H Shahbazian; P D Hahn; S Ludwig; J Ferguson; P Baron; A Christ; K Spicer; P Tolomeo; A M Torrie; W B Bilker; V C Cluzet; B Hu; K Julian; I Nachamkin; S C Rankin; D O Morris; E Lautenbach; M F Davis Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2017-10-31 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Ian C Glenn; Nicholas E Bruns; Domenic Craner; Alexander T Gibbons; Danial Hayek; Neil L McNinch; Oliver S Soldes; Todd A Ponsky Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2017-02-22 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: Patrick G Hogan; Marcela Rodriguez; Allison M Spenner; Jennifer M Brenneisen; Mary G Boyle; Melanie L Sullivan; Stephanie A Fritz Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2018-01-06 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Asha C Bowen; Jonathan R Carapetis; Bart J Currie; Vance Fowler; Henry F Chambers; Steven Y C Tong Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2017-11-02 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Guliz Erdem; Don Buckingham; Kevin Drewes; Brian Kenney; Annika Gibson; Nathaniel Gallup; William Barson Journal: Pediatr Qual Saf Date: 2020-02-15