Abraham Merzo1, Samuel Lenell1, Lena Nyholm1, Per Enblad1, Anders Lewén2. 1. Department of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery, Uppsala University, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden. 2. Department of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery, Uppsala University, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden. anders.lewen@neuro.uu.se.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The increasing number of elderly patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) leads to specific neurointensive care (NIC) challenges. Therefore, elderly subjects with TBI need to be further studied. In this study we evaluated the demographics, management and outcome of elderly TBI patients receiving modern NIC. METHODS: Patients referred to our NIC unit between 2008 and 2010 were included. Patients were divided in two age groups, elderly (E) ≥65 years and younger (Y) 64-15 years. Parameters studied were the dominant finding on CT scans, neurological motor skills and consciousness, type of monitoring, neurosurgical procedures/treatments and Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended score at 6 months after injury. RESULTS: Sixty-two E (22 %) and 222 Y (78 %) patients were included. Falls were more common in E (81 %) and vehicle accidents were more common in Y patients (37 %). Acute subdural hematoma was significantly more common in E (50 % of cases) compared to Y patients (18 %). Intracranial pressure was monitored in 44 % of E and 57 % of Y patients. Evacuation of significant mass lesions was performed more common in the E group. The NIC mortality was similar in both groups (4-6 %). Favorable outcome was observed in 72 % of Y and 51 % of E patients. At the time of follow-up 25 % of E and 7 % of Y patients had died. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of elderly patients with TBI was significantly worse than in younger patients, as expected. However, as much as 51 % of the elderly patients showed a favorable outcome after NIC. We believe that these results encourage modern NIC in elderly patients with TBI. We need to study how secondary brain injury mechanisms differ in the older patients and to identify specific outcome predictors for elderly patients with TBI.
BACKGROUND: The increasing number of elderly patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) leads to specific neurointensive care (NIC) challenges. Therefore, elderly subjects with TBI need to be further studied. In this study we evaluated the demographics, management and outcome of elderly TBI patients receiving modern NIC. METHODS:Patients referred to our NIC unit between 2008 and 2010 were included. Patients were divided in two age groups, elderly (E) ≥65 years and younger (Y) 64-15 years. Parameters studied were the dominant finding on CT scans, neurological motor skills and consciousness, type of monitoring, neurosurgical procedures/treatments and Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended score at 6 months after injury. RESULTS: Sixty-two E (22 %) and 222 Y (78 %) patients were included. Falls were more common in E (81 %) and vehicle accidents were more common in Y patients (37 %). Acute subdural hematoma was significantly more common in E (50 % of cases) compared to Y patients (18 %). Intracranial pressure was monitored in 44 % of E and 57 % of Y patients. Evacuation of significant mass lesions was performed more common in the E group. The NIC mortality was similar in both groups (4-6 %). Favorable outcome was observed in 72 % of Y and 51 % of E patients. At the time of follow-up 25 % of E and 7 % of Y patients had died. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of elderly patients with TBI was significantly worse than in younger patients, as expected. However, as much as 51 % of the elderly patients showed a favorable outcome after NIC. We believe that these results encourage modern NIC in elderly patients with TBI. We need to study how secondary brain injury mechanisms differ in the older patients and to identify specific outcome predictors for elderly patients with TBI.
Authors: Susruta Manivannan; Robert Spencer; Omar Marei; Isaac Mayo; Omar Elalfy; John Martin; Malik Zaben Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-12-03 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Alberto Consuegra; Katharina Lutz; Aristomenis K Exadaktylos; Werner J Z'Graggen; Rebecca M Hasler Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-08-17 Impact factor: 3.752