Literature DB >> 26576784

The lobar approach to breast ultrasound imaging and surgery.

Dominique Amy1, Enzo Durante2, Tibor Tot3.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is a lobar disease in the sense that, at the earliest stages, the cancer is structurally confined to a single sick lobe. The subgross morphology of breast carcinoma is often complex, as multiple invasive foci are frequently present and the ductal system often contains an extensive in situ component. Adequate preoperative visualization of all of the malignant structures within the affected breast and preoperative mapping of the lesions in relation to the surrounding normal structures are essential for successful image-guided breast surgery and therefore are key factors in assuring adequate local control of the disease. We advocate use of the lobar approach in ultrasound imaging (ducto-radial echography) and breast-conserving surgery based on the lobar anatomy of the breast, the sick lobe theory, our extensive clinical experience with the approach, and favorable long-term patient outcomes. Despite abundant evidence demonstrating the advantages of the lobar approach, the number of breast centers using it in practice is still limited. In this review, we aim to call attention to the advantages of the lobar approach from the theoretical, imaging, and surgical points of view.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast anatomy; Breast cancer; Breast-conserving surgery; Lobar ultrasound; Sick lobe theory

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26576784     DOI: 10.1007/s10396-015-0625-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)        ISSN: 1346-4523            Impact factor:   1.314


  27 in total

1.  Repeat surgery after breast conservation for the treatment of stage 0 to II breast carcinoma: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 2004-2010.

Authors:  Lee G Wilke; Tomasz Czechura; Chih Wang; Brittany Lapin; Erik Liederbach; David P Winchester; Katharine Yao
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 2.  [Echography of the breast. Indications, criteria and diagnostic possibilities].

Authors:  E Durante; N G Cavallesco; M Pampolini; L Cavazzini
Journal:  Minerva Chir       Date:  1989-02-15       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Breast cancer multifocality, disease extent, and survival.

Authors:  Tibor Tot; Mária Gere; Gyula Pekár; Miklós Tarján; Syster Hofmeyer; Dan Hellberg; David Lindquist; Tony Hsiu-His Chen; Amy Ming-Fang Yen; Sherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu; László Tabár
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery.

Authors:  Laurence E McCahill; Richard M Single; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Heather S Feigelson; Ted A James; Tom Barney; Jessica M Engel; Adedayo A Onitilo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Advantages of Ductal Echography (DE) over conventional breast investigation in the diagnosis of breast malignancies.

Authors:  Michel Teboul
Journal:  Med Ultrason       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.611

6.  A new concept in breast investigation: echo-histological acino-ductal analysis or analytic echography.

Authors:  M Teboul
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.529

Review 7.  Allelic imbalances of the egfr gene as key events in breast cancer progression--the concept of committed progenitor cells.

Authors:  K Agelopoulos; H Buerger; B Brandt
Journal:  Curr Cancer Drug Targets       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.428

8.  Factors correlating with reexcision after breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  M R Bani; M P Lux; K Heusinger; E Wenkel; A Magener; R Schulz-Wendtland; M W Beckmann; P A Fasching
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 4.424

9.  Hospital and surgeon caseload are associated with risk of re-operation following breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Marianna de Camargo Cancela; Harry Comber; Linda Sharp
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-07-28       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Factors Associated with Re-excision after Breast-Conserving Surgery for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Woohyun Jung; Eunyoung Kang; Sun Mi Kim; Dongwon Kim; Yoonsun Hwang; Young Sun; Cha Kyong Yom; Sung-Won Kim
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.588

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative imaging for breast conservation surgery-do we need more than conventional imaging for local disease assessment?

Authors:  Eugene Ong
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-12

2.  Synthetic aperture ultrasound imaging with a ring transducer array: preliminary ex vivo results.

Authors:  Xiaolei Qu; Takashi Azuma; Takeshi Yogi; Shiho Azuma; Hideki Takeuchi; Satoshi Tamano; Shu Takagi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 3.  The sick lobe hypothesis, field cancerisation and the new era of precision breast surgery.

Authors:  Mona P Tan; Tibor Tot
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.